Jump The Shark Moments

[Theo Dious]

Originally Posted by The CyNick So now he's what? The #2 heel? Oh the horror. Nobody looks at the idea of keeping Bray Wyatt relevant for 15 years instead of 15 months.

Seriously, if he was being wedged in the top heel spot the cries of "blowing their load with Wyatt!" and "forcing him down our throats! would be deafwning. Wyatt is being slowly tempered in the midcard, and NOT winning all of these feuds will add to his value in the long run. He isn't losing any credibility at all. Want proof? As many losses as he's had, he does one bit with Taker and suddenly the buzz is "TAKER VS WYATT AT SURVIVOR SERIES WHO WILL BE ON TAKER'S TEAM OMG THIS IS AWESOME."
You know who hardly ever got high level wins, let alone clear-cut feud wins? Jakes Roberts. That didn't diminish him at all. (Certain things did but a run of bad Mania matches and feud losses weren't it.)

[The CyNick]

Theo:

Exactly. And he doesn't lose to random guys. He loses the blowoff against guys like Cena and Reigns along with a one off against Taker. I don't think some people understand that's what a good heel does.

At some point Wyatt will have a babyface run. If he's plowed through everyone as a heel, what's the point of doing it again as a face?

I said this once or twice before, but if you read a lot of the stuff on here, nobody in the top half of the card should ever lose a feud. Except Cena. He should lose all of them.

[Theo Dious]

O

Originally Posted by The CyNick Theo: Exactly. And he doesn't lose to random guys. He loses the blowoff against guys like Cena and Reigns along with a one off against Taker. I don't think some people understand that's what a good heel does. At some point Wyatt will have a babyface run. If he's plowed through everyone as a heel, what's the point of doing it again as a face? I said this once or twice before, but if you read a lot of the stuff on here, nobody in the top half of the card should ever lose a feud. Except Cena. He should lose all of them.

Remember when Cena lost those early matches against Taker & Brock and everyone was wringing their hands like "o noes he iz burried now?" Look how that turned out.

[The CyNick]

Originally Posted by Theo Dious O Remember when Cena lost those early matches against Taker & Brock and everyone was wringing their hands like "o noes he iz burried now?" Look how that turned out.

Yes I do. Most people here will claim he came in on day one and dominated.

Few will talk about how he got saddled with B squared and managed to turn that into something positive.

Im a firm believer in talent rising to the top.

[Simple Fan]

Originally Posted by Theo Dious Seriously, if he was being wedged in the top heel spot the cries of "blowing their load with Wyatt!" and "forcing him down our throats! would be deafwning. Wyatt is being slowly tempered in the midcard, and NOT winning all of these feuds will add to his value in the long run. He isn't losing any credibility at all. Want proof? As many losses as he's had, he does one bit with Taker and suddenly the buzz is "TAKER VS WYATT AT SURVIVOR SERIES WHO WILL BE ON TAKER'S TEAM OMG THIS IS AWESOME." You know who hardly ever got high level wins, let alone clear-cut feud wins? Jakes Roberts. That didn't diminish him at all. (Certain things did but a run of bad Mania matches and feud losses weren't it.)

Jake also has one of the better winning percentages in history. Wyatt jobs on a regular basis.

[The CyNick]

Originally Posted by Simple Fan Jake also has one of the better winning percentages in history. Wyatt jobs on a regular basis.

Apples and oranges

Everyone had a good winning record on TV because of enhancement matches.

Wyatt to me doesn't lose a ton....waits for the guy who keeps tracks of wins and losses to chime in.