WWE RAW 11/9 feat. Bray hungry for more souls, Usos hungry for some gold, and Paige hungry at her house

[#1-norm-fan]

It's one of CyNick's tactics when he can't think of a way out of a silly argument he tried to make. Say something like "lol You changed the point" even though it makes no sense whatsoever and then sit back and feel like he actually got one up or something. lol The guy's resorted to reaching with "faith in McMahon" and conspiracy theories in other threads when he's run out of ways to defend things. This is kinda par for the course at this point.

[The CyNick]

Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan It's one of CyNick's tactics when he can't think of a way out of a silly argument he tried to make. Say something like "lol You changed the point" even though it makes no sense whatsoever and then sit back and feel like he actually got one up or something. lol The guy's resorted to reaching with "faith in McMahon" and conspiracy theories in other threads when he's run out of ways to defend things. This is kinda par for the course at this point.

That's literally what you did. Keep swinging though. You'll hit one eventually

[#1-norm-fan]

Originally Posted by The CyNick That's literally what you did. Keep swinging though. You'll hit one eventually

Actually, I said it was dumb in this situation. I literally reference that exact situation and not the vague "So heels shouldn't get one up on faces before a big match?" strawman (You like making me use that word, don't you?) you tried afterward. (That post is right there on the top of the page. For the literate to read.)

You responded by comparing it to Rock-Austin 2 weeks before WrestleMania. (Right there. To read. On this page.)

Then I said no. It's not comparable because in one situation you had to over guys going back and forth and in another you're trying to build up a glorified jobber as competition to a legend and spent all of 1 week making it look like the glorified jobber actually had a chance. (Look up. Right there.)

Then you accused me of changing the subject, presumably because you have the mental capacity of WWE's target audience. Which explains a lot.

Just because you like to randomly assert "you're changing the subject" to avoid having to come up with a new excuse for WWE's retarded writing doesn't make the actual posts that are right there on the page for everyone to see go away. You're better off just shutting up, backing out of the topic and hoping it gets buried on the 2nd page so you don't have to worry about trying to pull an explanation out of your ass like you usually do when you're backed into a corner.

[The CyNick]

Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan Actually, I said it was dumb in this situation. I literally reference that exact situation and not the vague "So heels shouldn't get one up on faces before a big match?" strawman (You like making me use that word, don't you?) you tried afterward. (That post is right there on the top of the page. For the literate to read.) You responded by comparing it to Rock-Austin 2 weeks before WrestleMania. (Right there. To read. On this page.) Then I said no. It's not comparable because in one situation you had to over guys going back and forth and in another you're trying to build up a glorified jobber as competition to a legend and spent all of 1 week making it look like the glorified jobber actually had a chance. (Look up. Right there.) Then you accused me of changing the subject, presumably because you have the mental capacity of WWE's target audience. Which explains a lot. Just because you like to randomly assert "you're changing the subject" to avoid having to come up with a new excuse for WWE's retarded writing doesn't make the actual posts that are right there on the page for everyone to see go away. You're better off just shutting up, backing out of the topic and hoping it gets buried on the 2nd page so you don't have to worry about trying to pull an explanation out of your ass like you usually do when you're backed into a corner.

This glorified jobber has lost to Cena, Taker, and Reigns.

Don't worry I won't point out how rediculous it is to call that guy a glorified jobber.

You really make me laugh. I swear when I read these types of posts its like watching a kid ride a bike without training wheels for the first time. You can see he sorta knows what to do, but he's still out of his league.

[Mr. Nerfect]

Originally Posted by The CyNick This glorified jobber has lost to Cena, Taker, and Reigns. Don't worry I won't point out how rediculous it is to call that guy a glorified jobber. You really make me laugh. I swear when I read these types of posts its like watching a kid ride a bike without training wheels for the first time. You can see he sorta knows what to do, but he's still out of his league.

I try not to use someone's spelling or grammar as a point in an argument, but anyone who uses "rediculous" immediately pisses on their own foot and betrays their lack of intelligence.