![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
( ._.)
Posts: 14,290
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think its safe to say if raw had a better product it would attract more viewers.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Posts: 3,033
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If Walking Dead went down to 5 million viewers per week, and then slowly declined to 4 million over the next 10 years nobody would call the show a failure. Especially if they did episodes 52 weeks a year.
WWE has been consistently #1 in their timeslot for the better part of 15 years. Only people in the IWC would see that as failure. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I think at some point the casual fans just grow tired of a concept and move on to the next hot thing. I would concur WWE isn't hot with casual fans, but the hardcore fans are more engaged than ever. Except for Big Vic, he stopped watching. Last edited by The CyNick; 03-29-2016 at 04:44 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |