DISCUSSION - Could "Montreal" have been averted by Bret Hart jobbing to Undertaker on RAW the next night?

**BigCrippyZ** · 04-01-2016, 08:20 PM

It's my understanding that the term for Bret's contract lasted for an additional 30 days approximately but even before Survivor Series Bret had already met his contractual number of performance dates. In other words, as an example, Bret was obligated to perform 200 days a year during the term of the contract, and Bret had already met this 200 day requirement prior to appearing at the PPV, but he was still under contract not to perform for any other promotion during the remainder of the term.

Any additional dates after Bret met his yearly minimum during the term, would've been one-off performance/appearance contractual agreements (probably oral/handshake agreements).

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

04-01-2016, 08:20 PM	#39
BigCrippyZ Posts: 3,033	It's my understanding that the term for Bret's contract lasted for an additional 30 days approximately but even before Survivor Series Bret had already met his contractual number of performance dates. In other words, as an example, Bret was obligated to perform 200 days a year during the term of the contract, and Bret had already met this 200 day requirement prior to appearing at the PPV, but he was still under contract not to perform for any other promotion during the remainder of the term. Any additional dates after Bret met his yearly minimum during the term, would've been one-off performance/appearance contractual agreements (probably oral/handshake agreements).