![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
BAY BAY
Posts: 36,524
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
![]() Ruh-roh. This could be the thing that destroys Corban's case. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Posts: 3,033
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
It was my impression that no mention was made of this issue yesterday at the pre-trial hearing. It was my impression that TNA argued that the contract did not meet the definition of a pledge and because it was not a pledge, it would be illegal under a different TN statute. I could be mistaken though and that doesn't mean it or both arguments weren't alleged in the written responsive pleadings. Even if TNA waived this as a defense, Dixie could also file a counterclaim to still argue argue this licensing claim. Even if TNA has waived this defense in this trial and Dixie doesn't counterclaim during this trial, and Corgan wins everything, this statute would still permit Dixie to file suit for a new trial after this trial arguing this licensing claim to recover her ownership. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
King of Suplexes/Oxy
Posts: 18,466
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Can't wait for the judge to be revealed to be Johnny Fairplay from Survivor in drag. |
|
|
|
|