![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Who is the better wrestler? | |||
| "Macho Man" Randy Savage |
|
24 | 55.81% |
| The Undertaker |
|
19 | 44.19% |
| Voters: 43. You must log in or register to vote on this poll. | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Posts: 61,634
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Undertaker is overrated as a performer, I'm going to say it. His longevity is amazing and he is a first-ballot Hall of Famer, no doubt, but Randy Savage is an icon that transcends. It's WWE canon that Taker is among the handful of the greatest ever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Celestia's Left Hand
Posts: 17,359
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You mean in the same way they prop up Triple H?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: 61,634
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Very similar, except I actually think Triple H is a better wrestler than Undertaker.
That it feels like blasphemy to critically examine the work of The Undertaker goes a long way to highlighting the mystique the company has managed to foster around him. But there were stretches of The Undertaker's career where he didn't draw and his work, frankly, fucking sucked. |
|
|
|