![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: How long should world champions hold the belt? | |||
| Weeks / a month or two |
|
1 | 5.56% |
| A few months |
|
4 | 22.22% |
| Several months, almost a year |
|
5 | 27.78% |
| About a year |
|
2 | 11.11% |
| More than a year / multiple years |
|
6 | 33.33% |
| Voters: 18. You must log in or register to vote on this poll. | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
b/c 5 is better than 4
Posts: 9,721
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The best worker in the company should always be around the belt, either chasing or retaining. Generally speaking, heel reigns should be longer than face reigns but there are always exceptions to the rule.....
I am a firm believer in longer World title reigns than the quick changes all the time, for secondary titles its less important.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Rebel With A Cause
Posts: 268
![]() ![]()
|
If done right, extensive world title runs should build more interest in secondary title matchups... thereby adding value to the secondary titles.
|
|
|
|