Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan
If all 32 of the women in that tournament were capable of winning it, then that's not a good thing. Parity in wrestling is never good.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan
Why is Curt Hawkins employed by WWE? Presumably because you need to fill out spots.
If all you're saying is "upsets could have happened", sure. It sounded like you were saying all 32 were neck and neck skill-wise and anyone could have beaten anyone because of it. Which would be bad.
|
I sometimes wonder about the Hawkins thing myself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by #BrotherVito DELETED
I can't help but be a mark for the guy. He's a really cool dude. Never complains. Seems to have totally embraced the gimmick and is more than happy to get a decent paycheck to travel and get squashed constantly vs. the indy grind. Plus he's got a wrestling school on the side and a hot wife. Not a bad gig at all.
Also I can't help but root for a fellow long-suffering Mets fan. The irony of a Mets fan losing all the time is not lost on me.
|
I like him more than Zack Ryder. I enjoyed him with Tyler Reks, but I just don't give a fuck about him on any meaningful level in 2018. He's so cursory. It's that ironic wrestling "look how over he's getting because he sucks" (in kayfabe) stuff. I don't see why you'd want to feature him over anyone else that is more interesting.
Good for him getting his job back though.