NFL Draft 2005

**BCWWF** · 02-12-2005, 09:03 PM

I never said that the Vikings would fall apart with Burress instead of Moss, they would still have a good offense, but Moss changes a game like only very few wide recievers do. I just don't agree that Moss's off field problems have affected him on the field, at least in the last year or two...

The original discussion has gone off track though, it was originally about Culpeppers #'s. Personally, I think that he would still be a good passer with Burress, but with Moss he is better. I overstated when I said 1/2 his stats, obviously I wasn't being serious though, but I understand that I have gone a little extreme in these two threads. I just think a Moss, TO, Marvin does something that no other WR's really do.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

02-12-2005, 09:03 PM	#30
BCWWF The People's Member Posts: 18,092	I never said that the Vikings would fall apart with Burress instead of Moss, they would still have a good offense, but Moss changes a game like only very few wide recievers do. I just don't agree that Moss's off field problems have affected him on the field, at least in the last year or two... The original discussion has gone off track though, it was originally about Culpeppers #'s. Personally, I think that he would still be a good passer with Burress, but with Moss he is better. I overstated when I said 1/2 his stats, obviously I wasn't being serious though, but I understand that I have gone a little extreme in these two threads. I just think a Moss, TO, Marvin does something that no other WR's really do.