Latest on the 'Brock Lesnar vs WWE' case

[Lamuella]

actually, it's a 6 year clause. He's only out until 2010

unless it's a 10 year from date of hire thing

[Corkscrewed]

Originally Posted by Lamuella actually, it's a 6 year clause. He's only out until 2010 unless it's a 10 year from date of hire thing

Both, I think. I want to say that Lesnar signed into OVW around 2001, which would make this make sense.

Anyway, 90 day no compete clauses are fine. Multi-year clauses are ridiculous, but it's your own idiotic fault for signing it. So I don't really have sympathy for Brock.

I supported him when he left, but I said that if he crawls back, then he's a laughable moron, because it would mean that he was just in it for the money.

Let him sit. Let more deserving stars take the time that he'd normally occupy.

[Kane Knight]

Originally Posted by Corkscrewed Both, I think. I want to say that Lesnar signed into OVW around 2001, which would make this make sense. Anyway, 90 day no compete clauses are fine. Multi-year clauses are ridiculous, but it's your own idiotic fault for signing it. So I don't really have sympathy for Brock. I supported him when he left, but I said that if he crawls back, then he's a laughable moron, because it would mean that he was just in it for the money. Let him sit. Let more deserving stars take the time that he'd normally occupy.

Lesnar was probably so sure he could just walk into the NFL.

I forget; was this for the duration of his remaining contract, or is this longer? Since they were letting him out of his contract so he could play football, I can see the former. Anything else is just ridiculous...

...But so is Brock for agreeing.