![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
Raw Video Footage
Posts: 45,950
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
It isn't a Hollywood problem, it's a consumer problem. If people valued new, original works than we wouldn't wait 4 years for the Inceptions and Splices. Hollywood is an amoral machine, it does what can feed it. We feed it. I promise if more people felt rehashes and sequels were boring Hollywood would adjust accordingly. Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hollywood does cater to the consumer, but they also play it safe. Movies are not artistic endeavours for them, they are investments.
You can't blame the masses since they will accept both, if done right. It's just safer to go with the proven. This is the studio's decision. The most successful movies aren't usually reboots. Remakes are normally moderate successes, that can almost guaruntee a small profit but nothing more. So I don't take anything back. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Raw Video Footage
Posts: 45,950
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I see. I guess we're done here.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's not as simple as you make it out to be either. Just because remakes and reboots turn a profit doesn't mean the masses are neccessarily eating them up.
You can make the argument that new quality properties are in higher demand. They usually do far better. People want to see new things. People complain about remakes all the time. Just because a lot of people still go to see movies that don't deliver this to them doesn't mean it's what they'd prefer. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Posts: 6,727
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Not to mention Inception did incredibly well this weekend... so I would say the masses do have an appetite for original material.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
continental drift
Posts: 46,731
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
My point being that it was a great film, with a great director, a great leading man and great supporting actors but it's not like it was some film out of left field or something that didn't have mainstream appeal already. The fact that it's a great film my a genius director/righter is kind of inconsequential in my mind. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
A lot of people will feel comfortable with proven directors, writers and actors. This has almost always been the case. Actors longer than directors. With Hitchcock and Spielberg the birth of the namebrand director became a part of the film industry, but they still brought new material to the table. In this situation the moviegoers and studios have the benefit of tapping into a brand and giving something new at the same time. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
continental drift
Posts: 46,731
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Posts: 6,727
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
As for remakes... it seems one thing the successful(artistically) ones were in the hands of strong directors. 12 Monkeys (Gilliam) The Thing (Carpenter) The Fly (Cronenberg) King Kong (Jackson) etc. etc. Then again the Psycho remake was directed by Gus van Sant ... but I would say he is the most experimental director of the names previously mentioned so his Psycho remake was more of a failed experiment. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Raw Video Footage
Posts: 45,950
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think you're giving too much credit to the tastes of the weekend moviegoer.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
People like new things, and it can be proven. I say you're not giving them enough credit. Even if they don't care enough to express this doesn't mean it isn't going on. It's possible for the masses to have attitudes and perferences that they don't neccessarily even know about.
Just because people are turning up to see uninspired movies still doesn't mean there isn't a lot of people who aren't showing up. That's what it's all about. The ones who aren't showing up. The potential dollars, not the safe ones. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Raw Video Footage
Posts: 45,950
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Whether something is original or sequel/remake is nigh irrelevant when the main qualifier is quality.
There has been original titles of dubious quality, and remakes of high quality. People like good movies, not merely new ones. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Obviously, but the question here is whether they'd prefer new to familiar when quality is more or less the same. I think they would. No one is saying familiar isn't in demand. It is safe and will always do well. If it's quality it can even be great, but in general I think new is higher yield. It's just also higher risk.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
And on the latter, you're very much trying to use the exception as the rule.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That actually reminds me of something I didn't even mention. The relationship between the material and the creators.
This is an important one to the studio, I think. With most remakes and reboots, the material and the name itself is the selling point. This allows them to cut corners with casting, writers and a director. Usually they'll aim low and let the title do the heavy lifting. With an unproven material you have to worry more about quality, so you're probably going to have to spend more. Again, it boils down to the difference between studios and the fans/filmmakers. The latter may view it as arts and entertainment, but the former views it all as investment and in business terms. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
continental drift
Posts: 46,731
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
My argument also is that Inception hasn't done well strictly because it's a quality film; there are other obvious elements that have allowed it to succeed.
The percentage of high-quality remakes is also rather low. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I don't want to state this like it's fact, because it's just a theory. I just think in general the public values new. Accepting familiar doesn't change that. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
continental drift
Posts: 46,731
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm also opposed to "remakes" in general anyway, so I'm pretty biased. I just don't see the reason for it. I mean, from the studio's point of view, I see the reason for it; they're easy to make and they're guaranteed money-makers. From an artistic standpoint, there's just no reason for remakes.
I'm sure there are quality remakes but I just don't see them as a rule. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
continental drift
Posts: 46,731
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The only remake I can think of that I like is The Night of the Living Dead remake from 1990.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I think The Thing is probably the best remake. The Fly and King Kong (2005) are also very good remakes. Maybe it's something about monster movies. Also, Scorcese's Cape Fear is way better than the original, I think. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
continental drift
Posts: 46,731
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
People are certainly turned on by new things but it would have done well anyway because it was a huge summer blockbuster with a gigantic budget, crazy special effects and a top leading man. Crap films like 2012 do well in the box office for the same reason, despite the lack of "quality" exhibited by a film like Inception.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
continental drift
Posts: 46,731
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
My argument is that quality or "new material" does not majorly influence box-office success as crappy films and remakes do just as well as quality films at the box-office.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
continental drift
Posts: 46,731
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I can jump on board with those remakes too, I guess. Especially The Fly.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
continental drift
Posts: 46,731
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Oh and The Departed is a good remake too.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Should be noted that those remakes are all done by quality directors though. The Fly was Cronenberg and King Kong was Peter Jackson.
And Scorcese obviously. Even The Thing was directed by John Carpenter who was on fire at the time. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
continental drift
Posts: 46,731
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The Departed again... Scorcese.
I also didn't mind the Texas Chainsaw Massacre remake for whatever reason. Not that I would call it a "good film" by any stretch of the imagination but yeah. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yea I kinda liked it too
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Halloween by Rob Zombie is probably the worst remake I've ever seen
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
continental drift
Posts: 46,731
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I kind of wanted to see Rob Zombie's take on Halloween but I didn't see it in the end. The original is perfect anyway.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
continental drift
Posts: 46,731
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The Psycho remake was really bad too.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yea it was shot for shot basically, just in color and with a horrible cast. What was the point Gus Van Sant?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I also think remaking Psycho, and any Hitchcock movie for that matter, is a failure from the get go.
Hitchcock films are all Hitchcock. He directs the shit out of them, and it's impossible to replicate. The content of Hitchcock film's isn't inconsequential by any stretch. Many of the stories are great, but they're definitely classics because of their form. He has a very distinct style and a Hitchcock movie is a "Hitchcock movie" for a reason. I would say touching his movies is pointless. Especially the more well known ones. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Posts: 6,727
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yeah, I agree, no one can weave artistry and entertrainment the way Hitch could, most enjoyable filmmaker ever. Hopefully the rest of his work is left alone.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
They're remaking The Birds right now I think. That's one of my least favorite Hitchcock films though
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Raw Video Footage
Posts: 45,950
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The Birds was lame.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Doin' It Right
Posts: 35,461
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Says the guy that wants The Breakfast Club to be remade
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
I'm Mr. White Christmas
Posts: 44,526
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
featuring Jesse Eisenberg as Anthony Michael Hall?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
continental drift
Posts: 46,731
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The Birds is good but it's not up there with Psycho/Vertigo/Shadow of a Doubt/Rear Window
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
Posts: 52,478
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I should have fucking known..
Yeah so..all day detention in College makes so much sense but I guess its the best they could do.. ugh Edit: Youtube took the video down, but it was the trailer for "This aint the Breakfast Club XXX" or whatever the hell it was called. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
I'm Mr. White Christmas
Posts: 44,526
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
would you relax with the porn spoofs Droford
|
![]() |
![]() |