![]() |
![]() |
#41 |
reeking of awesomeness
Posts: 447
![]() |
I say it's legitimate, b/c in order to be a top guy, you have to possess a certain charisma. Austin/Rock had loads of it, and Cody doesn't. His promos seem more about yelling to get his point across than comfortably speaking. I'm not saying he has to be the next Austin or Rock, but he does have to own the mic like they did. When he can easily work the crowd and become a major presence, then I will agree he should be a top guy.
I do like Cody and think he has potential, but until someone can motivate him to be himself more, he'll never fully connect with the crowd... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
One Of A Kind
Posts: 22,178
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Have never seen him as a 'top guy' anyway as he doesn't really have the size/look imo, all i've said(once again, maybe you'll listen this time) is its great how he's turned his career around and done aswell as he has. Don't know why you're arguing a different point to what is being made.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 | |
reeking of awesomeness
Posts: 447
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
One Of A Kind
Posts: 22,178
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No prob. Had a re-read of the thread and saw where your argument came from, missed the mentions of mic skills before.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Mr. Nice Guy
Posts: 1,647
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Cody can't be compared to Austin or Rock. Most wrestlers can't for that matter. I haven't really watched wrestling since Wrestlemania 25, but I've been watching again recently. Smackdown has been doing a better job keeping my attention than the other shows, and that's thanks in no small part to Cody. Is he the reason I'm watching again? No, but he does his job & does it well. Let the man grow as a performer before you compare him to the greats. He still has a good bit to go..
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
Cranky Kong
Posts: 78,671
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I mark out for Cody Rhodes. I don't really feel it's necessary to think too hard about it as a fan.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 | |
reeking of awesomeness
Posts: 447
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
FIT Challenge Slag People
Posts: 13,816
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Theres a difference between calling someone amazing and comparing someone to the best of all-time, though. For example, this Orton/Xian/Sheamus story is amazing, but it's no Austin/McMahon or Hogan/Sting (the real one, not The Dark Knight Wrestles).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
One Of A Kind
Posts: 22,178
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes, exactly.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
reeking of awesomeness
Posts: 447
![]() |
Again, it's all a matter of opinion. I personally think calling someone amazing is implying they are great. Which IMO Cody is decent, but not good or great at this point in his career. While I do agree he's made the best of a bad situation, he has alot of character development to do before he can be considered amazing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#51 |
Cranky Kong
Posts: 78,671
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You sure are taking semantics to the extreme here. When I made the thread and used the word 'amazing', I was certainly drunk, but even then, I wasn't thinking that Cody was on the same level of The Rock or Stone Cold. Nobody said anything like that at all, actually. So now that it's clarified from the guy that said the word 'amazing', are you still as bothered by it? Or is it all in the word for you? If you want, I'll even change the thread title to "Cody Rhodes is good right now".
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
FIT Challenge Slag People
Posts: 13,816
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No, because he's decent! Not good or great.
...or something along those lines. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
Cranky Kong
Posts: 78,671
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
"Cody Rhodes is a Wrestler: The Thread"
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
FIT Challenge Slag People
Posts: 13,816
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Nuh-uh! He's an entertainer!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
Cranky Kong
Posts: 78,671
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fuck.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 |
FIT Challenge Slag People
Posts: 13,816
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
"Cody Rhodes Is"
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 |
Cranky Kong
Posts: 78,671
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Not necessarily. What if someone has never heard of him? To them, he is not.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 |
FIT Challenge Slag People
Posts: 13,816
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
How very existential.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 |
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,151
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
LOL
How about: "Cody Rhodes is amazing...at being a midcard talent right now"? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 | |
reeking of awesomeness
Posts: 447
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#61 |
Cranky Kong
Posts: 78,671
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You weren't even really disagreeing with my opinion, though. You were disagreeing with a sentiment that was put forward by no one but yourself (comparing Cody to Austin and The Rock) and your basis for that was purely a word I used. Having a different opinion is fine, but arguing for the sake of it is lame. It also appears to be what you do in pretty much every thread you post in.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#62 |
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,151
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Amen!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#63 |
Over Like Rover
Posts: 38,444
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
lol I love it when somebody brings up the 'taking it seriously' argument/response as some variety of defense. It's classic silly people. Like somehow actually making a point takes longer than anything else.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#64 |
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,151
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Especially when the guy making said point goes to great lengths to "argue his corner". Cos that's not taking it seriously, right?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#65 | |
reeking of awesomeness
Posts: 447
![]() |
Quote:
I never argue for the sake of arguing, but if I disagree with something, I will add my thoughts on it. And for the most part, I explain why I agree or disagree with any thread's content. How is that lame? Ppl on wrestling forums too often flame someone that doesn't go along with popular opinion. Just b/c I have my own original thoughts or ideas doesn't mean I wanna argue. It means I wanna discuss the issue and explain my POV and even learn from other opinions or ideas. Unfortunately, as demonstrated here, ppl would rather flame than discuss something. Easy to be dismissive and sarcastic to avoid discussion if you simply don't feel the need to explain your position on a topic. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#66 |
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,151
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Dude, relax. Don't take it all too seriously, y'know?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#67 |
Over Like Rover
Posts: 38,444
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
lol have you noticed how many times you've claimed people appear to 'not get' something you say in the small amount of time you've been posting? You don't think that just maybe the problem is you?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#68 |
reeking of awesomeness
Posts: 447
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#69 |
Over Like Rover
Posts: 38,444
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
do you even know what you're on about at the moment?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#70 |
Cranky Kong
Posts: 78,671
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I would love to explain my position on a matter if it is, in fact, my position. I wasn't trying to say that Cody is an elite superstar. I just used the word 'amazing', and admittedly, it was hyperbole. As far as "flaming", you were the one to call me an asshole.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#71 | |
FIT Challenge Slag People
Posts: 13,816
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Do you remember Venn diagrams from school? If amazing wrestlers/gimmicks/angles was one circle and the best wrestlers/gimmicks/angles of all-time was another, you could fit the latter circle into the former. Austin, Rock, the nWo, those are all in the smaller circle on the inside of the larger one that contains Cody Rhodes, Muhammad Hassan, and DDP dressed up as La Parka. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#72 | |
reeking of awesomeness
Posts: 447
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#73 | |
reeking of awesomeness
Posts: 447
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#74 |
Posts: 24,441
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Every single post of yours in this thread has said the exact same thing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#75 |
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,151
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I know how AbT feels about Cody Rhodes, not so sure how christiancharismark feels about him though...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#76 |
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,151
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Seriously though, most people agree that Cody is at least "good" BECAUSE of his character and mic work - the 2 things ccm has criticised as "complacent".
Seems strange. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#77 | |
reeking of awesomeness
Posts: 447
![]() |
Quote:
![]() I'd rather be considered a moron for giving my opinion and discussing something rationally than blindly marking out for a guy. I have yet to see ABT or XL say why they think Cody is so amazing. When I actually try asking for an answer after I explain why I don't like him, all they do is respond with one sentence and totally avoid the question. In several instances name calling or flaming my views. Wow, I could never see that coming. It's wrestling smarks like these that make intelligent discussion impossible at wrestling forums. They'd rather attack me for having an original thought or idea than discuss a topic. Ironic too that I'm accused of taking this seriously, but they respond to every reply I make, often not even discussing the topic itself...:foc: |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#78 |
FIT Challenge Slag People
Posts: 13,816
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You don't think Austin was complacent?
I mean, don't get me wrong, he's one of the best of all-time (although I hate his guts), but he cut the same promo, had the same match, and did the same run-in for about four years. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#79 |
Cranky Kong
Posts: 78,671
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
How have I attacked you? I stated my opinions on Cody Rhodes numerous times throughout this topic, and I never neg repped you or anything. As far as you and I go specifically, I did take a cut at your exaggeration of semantics, but that was only because you were counteracting points that I never even tried to make. I've admitted on numerous occasions that perhaps 'amazing' was an extreme term, and you can have that. That's fine. But to insinuate that I'm flaming you for your opinion is pretty far off the mark. Almost as far off the mark as you've been with your Austin/Rock comparison.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#80 | ||
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,151
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Also, surely the term "marking out" by definition means that you don't have to give a rational explanation? Dunno. Maye I'm wrong there. Quote:
His delivery is solid pretty much 100% of the time, he handles what is a fairly "difficult" character very well AND he is good in the ring. We've established that noboby thinks he is the next Austin/Rock, but I am enjoying his work in the MIDCARD - where interesting characters are very rare. |
||
![]() |
![]() |