![]() |
![]() |
#41 |
Part time poster
Posts: 22,963
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You can see when they first got on the cage that the support ties were popping off. Extremely possible it was a shoot.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sadistic has spoken. There's no countering, Rob.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
1/2 Optimist 1/2 Amazing
Posts: 12,427
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
For the record, shoot or not. I love the spot and I'm a massive Foley mark anyway, so it doesn't take anything away from me if it was planned or not. This is just a theory I've had for a while.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
The Great Pink Hope
Posts: 8,817
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Just to add to the conspiracy theorists amongst us -
"If the spot was planned, did UT position himself on another section of the cell so that he wouldn't fall through as well? The chokeslam he gave Foley was executed so that he landed on a separate section of the cage. Typically, chokeslams are given so that the receipient is planted fairly close to the UT's feet. Yet the bump onto of the cell was given so that Foley landed on a separate section altogether, a considerable distance from the UT's grounding" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
The Great Pink Hope
Posts: 8,817
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
...on the other hand you could say that UT recognised that the cage was brittle and could give way if he were to slam Foley on the same section that he was also standing and putting pressure on also. So he did this for both his and Foley's safety.
But then again, if he was aware of this... why did he wish to chokeslam Foley at all? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 | |
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 | |
R.I.P Tanner
Posts: 8,219
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 | |
The Great Pink Hope
Posts: 8,817
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
That's now my biggest concern. Since both Foley and Taker knew the cage was brittle and breakable, why did they go for the chokeslam anyway? Surely they could have predicted what might happen. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
Part time poster
Posts: 22,963
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
All you have to do is watch the start of the match and watch the cage clasps pop.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
Posts: 6,727
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yea i'll believe Foley. Just doesn't make much sense that he would take a bump that is more painful yet visually less pleasing the previous big bump. But then again the cage clamps did go back and to the left.
|
![]() |
![]() |