TPWW.net 2009 Rookie of the Year

[Phenomenal 1]

NOTE: THIS WILL BE THE FIRST OF A SERIES OF YEAR END AWARDS THREADS THAT I AM GOING TO BE CREATING FROM NOW UNTIL NEW YEARS. THERE WILL BE ONE OR TWO CATEGORY AWARDS THREADS PER WEEK.

As 2009 comes to a close in the world of professional wrestling, many faces have come, and many faces have gone, and many new faces have appeared.

To be considered a standout new prospect amongst your peers in the world of professional wrestling and as someone to say "keep your eyes on this guy...he's gonna be someone to watch" is considered a high honor.

So make your choices wisely and pick who you believe was the standout talent of pro wrestling and should be given the Honor of "TPPW.net Rookie of the Year 2009."

On a side note here are the rules/criteria for winning this award:


1. VOTE for the Wrestlers listed in the poll or if you choose the write in option, please post a response and submit the name of the person you are nonminating and why you are nominating them. Ridiculous or outlandish votes do not count.

2. To be considered a rookie, it would either be your first year in one of the big two promotions (WWE, TNA) or your first time in the that particular promotion. Gimmicks also count as a rookie, such as someone under a mask like Suicide even though we know its Kazarian.

3. No indy fed guys or lower spotlight promotion wrestlers. Sorry but due to the availability for people to see International Wrestling, ROH, CZW, Dragon Gate, NWA, which is a limited basis, these wrestlers don't have the exposure for everyone to understand the vote. Write ins for indy fed guys will be thrown out.

4. No women wrestlers....sorry but there is just not enough women wrestlers to consider someone to be a main standout and women's wrestling isn't as mainstream with the fans in my opinion.

5. Substantiate your votes. Post a response telling us who you voted for and why you believe they should win. Having the most number of votes doesn't necessarily say that someone will win. I will take into consideration number of votes but also substantiation from user posts. One wrestler could have 50 votes and no substantion and another wrestler could have 20 votes but have 75 posts substantiating why he should win. IF YOU ARE GOING TO BE BIG ENOUGH TO VOTE FOR YOUR WRESTLER, STAND BEHIND YOUR WRESTLER AND BACK UP WHY THEY SHOULD WIN!!!

Thats the rules and the criteria folks....Happy voting/discussion...I will post the results at the end of the week and announce the Winner and how that wrestler came to win.

GOOD LUCK!!!