batista,vince,bret,cena - Page 2

**Damian Rey** · 02-09-2010, 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The MAC

I said it here..Bret can go much more than we think and give him credit for.

I'll tell you what Mac, if I see a backbreaker, elbow off the second rope, side russian leg sweep, or a sternum-first turnbuckle bump from Bret come Mania, I will rep you.

And don't forget, I agreed

**Zen v.W.o.** · 02-09-2010, 04:01 PM

I really want to see the figure four around the ring post again.

**jettson80** · 02-09-2010, 04:35 PM

Maybe Shawn gets involved somehow, perhaps saving Bret from Batista, then screws Bret so Vince will give him his shot at Taker at Mania? Just throwing it out there...

**Damian Rey** · 02-09-2010, 04:52 PM

I don't think it's out of the realm of possibility. But seeing as Shawn has been completely uninvolved in the entire storyline apart from pushing for Bret to be brough back and the truce, I don't think it's probable. I think HBK finds a way into SmackDown!. maybe Truth will be this year's Kilfi at the chamber.

**jettson80** · 02-09-2010, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damian Rey

I don't think it's out of the realm of possibility. But seeing as Shawn has been completely uninvolved in the entire storyline apart from pushing for Bret to be brough back and the truce, I don't think it's probable. I think HBK finds a way into SmackDown!. maybe Truth will be this year's Kilfi at the chamber.

That's true, but up until a little while ago, Batista was uninvolved, too. He just kind of jumped in there. I dunno, I have been hoping for Shawn to be involved in this angle since it began, heel or face, I don't care.

**Damian Rey** · 02-09-2010, 05:09 PM

I don't think it would hurt, but I get the feeling they're going to leave Shawn to do his own thing, like a possible fued with Triple H.

As for Batista, I think that was soley to give him and Cena something to start a fued over. And I like the way they seem to go about it. Cena's the stand up guy who loves what eh does and respects those who came before him; Bats is the guy who lost his pasison and only wants the money and fame. Bret/Vince were just the common denominators.

Overall, I am very happy and excited to see where they go with everything, as I've really been enjoying Raw the past two weeks, and SmackDown! is always good.

**jettson80** · 02-09-2010, 11:05 PM

Yea, you're probably right. It just drives me crazy though, that they wouldn't make Shawn a major part of this feud, considering how big of a part of it he was in 1997. I can see, however, how that wouldn't matter to WWE, since the majority of their fans are being educated about it on the fly, as most of them were very young or not born yet when that happened.
That being said, it does make sense for them to leave Shawn out of this one and have him feud with Taker and/or Hunter. It gives them a whole other program to promote, and have a potentially major storyline for two more major players.

**The MAC** · 02-10-2010, 05:21 AM

yes, Bret went from almost no reaction on his return to a much better pop this past raw.

I would have liked bret VS shawn grudge match wth bret going over then taking on Vince . We know that would never happen so vince vs Bret in a stret fight match would be what is acceptable.

The figure 4 around the ring post is awesome but VERY dangerous for Bret as he will hit his head on the floor if the opponent miscues or doesn't hold his foot as he goes down.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

02-09-2010, 04:01 PM	#42
Zen v.W.o. GO HABS GO! Posts: 4,018	I really want to see the figure four around the ring post again.

02-09-2010, 04:35 PM	#43
jettson80 Junior Member Posts: 42	Maybe Shawn gets involved somehow, perhaps saving Bret from Batista, then screws Bret so Vince will give him his shot at Taker at Mania? Just throwing it out there...

02-09-2010, 04:52 PM	#44
Damian Rey Posts: 3,755	I don't think it's out of the realm of possibility. But seeing as Shawn has been completely uninvolved in the entire storyline apart from pushing for Bret to be brough back and the truce, I don't think it's probable. I think HBK finds a way into SmackDown!. maybe Truth will be this year's Kilfi at the chamber.

02-09-2010, 05:09 PM	#46
Damian Rey Posts: 3,755	I don't think it would hurt, but I get the feeling they're going to leave Shawn to do his own thing, like a possible fued with Triple H. As for Batista, I think that was soley to give him and Cena something to start a fued over. And I like the way they seem to go about it. Cena's the stand up guy who loves what eh does and respects those who came before him; Bats is the guy who lost his pasison and only wants the money and fame. Bret/Vince were just the common denominators. Overall, I am very happy and excited to see where they go with everything, as I've really been enjoying Raw the past two weeks, and SmackDown! is always good.

02-09-2010, 11:05 PM	#47
jettson80 Junior Member Posts: 42	Yea, you're probably right. It just drives me crazy though, that they wouldn't make Shawn a major part of this feud, considering how big of a part of it he was in 1997. I can see, however, how that wouldn't matter to WWE, since the majority of their fans are being educated about it on the fly, as most of them were very young or not born yet when that happened. That being said, it does make sense for them to leave Shawn out of this one and have him feud with Taker and/or Hunter. It gives them a whole other program to promote, and have a potentially major storyline for two more major players.

02-10-2010, 05:21 AM	#48
The MAC VG + Q&A FORUM REPRESENT Posts: 2,957	yes, Bret went from almost no reaction on his return to a much better pop this past raw. I would have liked bret VS shawn grudge match wth bret going over then taking on Vince . We know that would never happen so vince vs Bret in a stret fight match would be what is acceptable. The figure 4 around the ring post is awesome but VERY dangerous for Bret as he will hit his head on the floor if the opponent miscues or doesn't hold his foot as he goes down.