TPWW Forums  

Go Back   TPWW Forums > o f f t o p i c > entertainment forum
Reload this Page The Hobbit
Register Members List Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 5 of 5 1234 5
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-11-2013, 04:40 PM   #1
Corporate CockSnogger
 
Corporate CockSnogger's Avatar
 
Posts: 24,441
Corporate CockSnogger makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Corporate CockSnogger makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Corporate CockSnogger makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Corporate CockSnogger makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Corporate CockSnogger makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Corporate CockSnogger makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Corporate CockSnogger makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Corporate CockSnogger makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Corporate CockSnogger makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Corporate CockSnogger makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Corporate CockSnogger makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Corporate CockSnogger makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Corporate CockSnogger makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Hi Evangelineeeee
Corporate CockSnogger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2013, 06:22 PM   #2
stultiloquy
Daffanatic
 
stultiloquy's Avatar
 
Posts: 777
stultiloquy is good (20,000+)stultiloquy is good (20,000+)stultiloquy is good (20,000+)stultiloquy is good (20,000+)stultiloquy is good (20,000+)stultiloquy is good (20,000+)stultiloquy is good (20,000+)stultiloquy is good (20,000+)
I didn't care for the majority of the CGI I saw in the first Hobbit movie, and while I didn't see anything glaring in that trailer, I'm not really confident that the CGI quality will be any better.

It's kind of odd considering how nice Gollum still looks when watching LOTR...not sure why they couldn't achieve that level of quality with The Hobbit.
stultiloquy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2012, 10:55 PM   #3
SlickyTrickyDamon
Quark is Less Impressed.
 
SlickyTrickyDamon's Avatar
 
Posts: 38,371
SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by VSG View Post
STD, you do realize LOTR is 6 books and this movie is just 1 of 3 in total, correct?

P.S. There are many more books on middle earth about the whole saga. You should go read them before declaring The Hobbit as the worst.
They don't have the rights to the Untold tales or the Similiarion. The Hobbit should be 1 of 2 movies. Not 1 of 3.
SlickyTrickyDamon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2012, 11:32 PM   #4
Kalyx triaD
Raw Video Footage
 
Kalyx triaD's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,950
Kalyx triaD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kalyx triaD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kalyx triaD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kalyx triaD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kalyx triaD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kalyx triaD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kalyx triaD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kalyx triaD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kalyx triaD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kalyx triaD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kalyx triaD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kalyx triaD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kalyx triaD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlickyTrickyDamon View Post
They don't have the rights to the Untold tales or the Similiarion. The Hobbit should be 1 of 2 movies. Not 1 of 3.
I was happy when the Hobbit got extended to three movies. Why would this bother you at all? The more the better.

I'm pretty sure if WB made a new Harry Potter not based on any novel, Potter fans wouldn't rage at the idea. After a little while the studio side gets a sort of authority with the movie universe and they should be allowed to further interpret things. This includes a new movie.
Kalyx triaD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 10:23 AM   #5
El Capitano Gatisto
World Class Raconteur
 
El Capitano Gatisto's Avatar
 
Posts: 29,478
El Capitano Gatisto makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)El Capitano Gatisto makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)El Capitano Gatisto makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)El Capitano Gatisto makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)El Capitano Gatisto makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)El Capitano Gatisto makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)El Capitano Gatisto makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)El Capitano Gatisto makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)El Capitano Gatisto makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)El Capitano Gatisto makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)El Capitano Gatisto makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)El Capitano Gatisto makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)El Capitano Gatisto makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kalyx triaD View Post
I was happy when the Hobbit got extended to three movies. Why would this bother you at all? The more the better.

I'm pretty sure if WB made a new Harry Potter not based on any novel, Potter fans wouldn't rage at the idea. After a little while the studio side gets a sort of authority with the movie universe and they should be allowed to further interpret things. This includes a new movie.
I haven't seen it yet, but I'm not particularly happy about the extension as it smacks of money-grabbing. If the reason to do something is to try to eke out more cash then it's not a good enough reason in my opinion. Guillermo del Toro dropping from the project and then this extension to 3 films was a problem for me, because both suggest undue marketing influence on the artistic direction, but I'll still go see this.
El Capitano Gatisto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 11:49 PM   #6
Hanso Amore
You can't teach that
 
Hanso Amore's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,337
Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Hanso Amore makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Capitano Gatisto View Post
I haven't seen it yet, but I'm not particularly happy about the extension as it smacks of money-grabbing. If the reason to do something is to try to eke out more cash then it's not a good enough reason in my opinion. Guillermo del Toro dropping from the project and then this extension to 3 films was a problem for me, because both suggest undue marketing influence on the artistic direction, but I'll still go see this.
I felt the same way. I still do. Reeks of money grab.

But after seeing part 1 so far I wasn't "let down". Felt they did a good job of making it a good flick and 3 parts so if the next two are as good I think it's just as greats a trilogy as Lotr
Hanso Amore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2012, 12:26 AM   #7
SlickyTrickyDamon
Quark is Less Impressed.
 
SlickyTrickyDamon's Avatar
 
Posts: 38,371
SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)SlickyTrickyDamon makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kalyx triaD View Post
I was happy when the Hobbit got extended to three movies. Why would this bother you at all? The more the better.

I'm pretty sure if WB made a new Harry Potter not based on any novel, Potter fans wouldn't rage at the idea. After a little while the studio side gets a sort of authority with the movie universe and they should be allowed to further interpret things. This includes a new movie.
“I feel thin, sort of stretched, like butter scraped over too much bread.” Bilbo. If they can buy the rights to the other books make them all. I'd pay to see them all as long as Peter Jackson still directs them.

As for Potter the story is over unless J.K. Rowling says it isn't. It wouldn't be a studio choice at all. Fans would be pissed if they had another Potter without her involvement since she's still alive. She'd also probably retro-actively give that power to her next of kin also.
SlickyTrickyDamon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 5 of 5 1234 5
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Hybrid Mode Hybrid Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:58 AM.

Forums Home - TPWW - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin®