TPWW Forums  

Go Back   TPWW Forums > w r e s t l i n g > wrestling forum

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-08-2010, 01:27 AM   #1
Xero
He's Here
 
Xero's Avatar
 
Posts: 60,735
Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
The 90-Day Non-Compete Clause

What would TNA and the talent in question face if their WWE contract was up, but they ignored the 90 day non-compete clause?

Let's say, for arguments sake, Rey Mysterio is fed up with everything and just wants to quit the business. His contract was up yesterday, he was on WWE TV last week, and TNA brings him on TV for a one-off appearance on tonight's show as a "surprise".

This obviously sets off breach of contract for Mysterio with fines, lawsuits, and likely some kind of thing that says he can't work for another wrestling company for x amount of years. But what kind of backlash could TNA face in this? Are they liable at all?

Edit: Actually, I just realized that I THINK the 90-Day clause is only in affect if their contract is terminated. So let's say he was released yesterday. If I have that wrong, let's just say that the clause is in effect.



Last edited by Xero; 03-08-2010 at 01:33 AM.
Xero is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®