DISCUSSION - Triple H haters: How do you explain Cena and Batista being put overly cleanly?

[Heyman]

DISCUSSION - Triple H haters: How do you explain Cena and Batista being put overly cleanly?

Here is my best argument from a Pro-Triple H stance:

If a wrestler is almost a "sure thing" to become the next 'Franchise Guy' for the WWE, Triple H will do the clean JOB to the guy to get him over. Period.

Triple H jobbed cleanly to Cena in 2006 at Wrestlemania, and flat out tasted Dave Batista's penis on 3 different occasions in 2005.........one of which, was at Wrestlemania 21.

In recent memory, Brock Lesnar got the better of Triple H in their feud (Lesnar won 2 of 3 matches I believe).

While it's true that guys like Angle, Jericho, RVD, Orton, Booker T, Edge, and even Benoit (ultimately), and a long host of other wrestlers were unable to ultimately 'go over' Triple H to the point of ascending to that "next level" on a permanent basis, ask yourself this:

"Would any of the guys that Triple H supposedly buried...........would they have been true "Franchise Guys" in the manner that Bruno Sammartino, Hogan, Austin, The Rock, and John Cena were?


Pro-Triple H Stance Conclusion:

Triple H will put over guys that have a legit shot of being the next "Franchise Guy" in the WWE. As a result, Triple H is a guy that puts the business ahead of himself. By being so selective in who he JOBS to, it ultimately magnifies the effect of he does ultimately JOB to.

In those rare instances where Triple H does JOB..........it means something. Huge.

For this reason, I ultimately do think that Trips will do the right thing for business and allow for Daniel Bryan to ultimately 'get over' to the next level at some point.