QUESTION - Why not Chris Jericho vs. Undertaker at Wrestlemania? Loser must retire.

**Heyman** · 01-05-2016, 07:03 AM

QUESTION - Why not Chris Jericho vs. Undertaker at Wrestlemania? Loser must retire.

From a 'fresh feud' perspective, I think it would hold interest as Jericho vs. Taker has never been done before (my guess is that Jericho likely had nuclear heat with Taker from way back in the day which is why Taker probably refused to work with Y2J, but this likely won't be the case in 2016).

From a wrestling perspective, I think Jericho vs. Taker should be decent. Won't be as good as HBK/Taker, but should be better than HHH/Taker.

What say you?

View Poll Results: Is Chris Jericho vs. Undertaker at Wrestlemania 32 a good idea?
Yes	2	12.50%
No	5	31.25%
Kane Knight is a 35+ year old faggot that lives in his parents' basement	9	56.25%
Voters: 16. You must log in or register to vote on this poll.

01-05-2016, 07:03 AM	#1
Heyman Father of Hinduship Posts: 21,083	QUESTION - Why not Chris Jericho vs. Undertaker at Wrestlemania? Loser must retire. QUESTION - Why not Chris Jericho vs. Undertaker at Wrestlemania? Loser must retire. From a 'fresh feud' perspective, I think it would hold interest as Jericho vs. Taker has never been done before (my guess is that Jericho likely had nuclear heat with Taker from way back in the day which is why Taker probably refused to work with Y2J, but this likely won't be the case in 2016). From a wrestling perspective, I think Jericho vs. Taker should be decent. Won't be as good as HBK/Taker, but should be better than HHH/Taker. What say you?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode