![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Father of Hinduship
Posts: 21,083
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
QUESTION - Who would you rather take it up the ass from?
Personally? My vote goes for Michael Jackson. Jim Ross is gettin' up there in age and as result, may not be able to get it up.
![]() How about you? Who would YOU rather take it up the ass from? |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Father of Hinduship
Posts: 21,083
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
DAMMIT!
I forgot to add the poll function. :foc: Being drunk makes me do this these things. ![]() POLL: Option A: Michael Jackson (my choice ![]() Option B: Jim Ross |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Only Sane Person Here
Posts: 17,983
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I don't know.
MJ was born black, meaning he may very well have a large penis. But it would be easier to imagine him as a woman with a strap on than it would with JR. JR would probably have a smaller penis though, so it wouldn't be as painful. Hard decision. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Father of Hinduship
Posts: 21,083
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
You're right. Michael Jackson is pretty "well endowed" if I don't say so myself (I visited his Never Land Ranch in 96'). Jim Ross probably does have a much smaller penis, but Jackson's got a 13 incher. ![]() In making this decision, I think "endurance" has to be taken into account. Like I said, JR is gettin' "up there" in age. Jackson is a dancer and so he is in much better condition. Jackson's probably got better endurance. My vote goes for the Smooth Criminal. ![]() |
|
![]() |