![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Incoming Text
Posts: 2,646
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The following doesn't work:
Writer #1: I've got it! Lets move Christian to Smackdown and keep Tyson Tomko on RAW!
Writer #2: Uh, aren't they partners? Writer #1: Yeah, but i'm sure Tomko will do fine on his own. He deserves a chance to leave a mark on RAW! Writer #2: Your right, it always works out anyways. Lets get out of here, Ross is only open for another hour. The first formula I haven't seen work is taking a team thats actually GOING somewhere and splitting them up. They did this with Bubba and D-Von, and they did it with the Hardys. None of them succeded. And do you remember when Scotty was on Smackdown! and Grandmaster came back and was put on RAW? Remember what he did? Got beat by Kane three times and then got fired. That was a good idea. Now I know that the Dudleyz and Hardys weren't a good example because at that point they "were both getting stale, blah blah blah". But you see my point. I think that if a team seems to have good chemistry and the fans enjoy them, they shouldn't split them up; they guys they should be worrying about are the ones that aren't going ANYWHERE. The other formula that pisses me off is that when a tag team has only been around for a little bit and are doing well, EVERYTIME, they turn on eachother. London and Kidman is the most recent example, but I could take it all the way back to when the Rock and Undertaker had the titles, or DX even. The WWE needs to get some quality teams and alliances together and stick with them. I could name a HANDFUL of times when I missed a raw or smackdown, and the next episode I watched, Angle had changed from good guy to bad guy or vice versa. Fuck That. In conclusion, they should have just given Tomko his pink slip instead of keeping him around for another month or two. |
|
|
|