If they're so great, why haven't they had a good title reign in years?

[Dorkchop]

* Undertaker: If he's soooooooooooooo good, why hasn't he had a good title reign in years? I can't remember his last good title reign. I want to say during his American badass gimmick, but I don't remember him with a decent title reign.

* Shawn Michaels: He came back 3 years ago, won the title, then lost it a month later. It's been 3 years and no title reign. In these past 3 years he's been in some of WWE's best matches. He's been pretty much nothing but incredibly consistent in the ring.

It's just kind of odd because everyone seems to speak so highly of them.

One of my arguments is that the WWE is too set on trying to make another Austin or Rock. Which is stupid because you can't try and create another Austin... They just have to happen. A lot of the time they're not going with what's working. Christian got mad pops, but the WWE didn't go along with the audience.