![]() |
![]() |
#1 | |
As over as Crystal Pepsi
Posts: 21,639
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tell me why.....
some people want to see the brand split end?
Do you really want to see story lines rushed three times a week? Do you really want to see one champion three times a week? Do you really want to see John Cena/Dancin' Dave Batista three times a week? Snitsky/Umaga/Khali/Mark Henry/Moster of the month squash someone three times a week? Do you really want to hear about Mr. Peanut's wedding three times a week? I can't think of one reason why people would enjoy the brand split. It would mean less wrestlers would make it to the main event scene, more people getting held down, and more of the same crap every single week. Raw has their titles, SmackDown has theirs, and ECW has its title. If anything I'd like to see the brand split become stronger. I'd just like to see the PPV's once a month, with the big four (wrestlemania, royal rumble, summerslam, survior series) tri-branded and then give each brand 3 ppvs each (that is if ECW could get the roster to support that). It'll give time for the brands to make better story lines, more time for fans to warm up to wrestlers before a PPV. I'm pretty set in my ways when it comes to the brands, so can someone tell me why ending the brand split would be a good idea? Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |