![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
( ._.)
Posts: 14,413
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
The crowd didn't openly reject Reigns until he won the rumble If he gets tossed out of the rumble, he wouldn't be catching so much flak. But he still can't cut a promo, I thought he would have been ready by now. You could continue with Rusev being a dominating champ like HHH in 2003 with losing some title matches here and there until someone who can carry the company dethrones him. He made the Belt look very strong, but not the people he is facing. It would be on thing if Cena beat some people easily and then had really close matchs with other guys. But if your having really close matches with everyone then it doesn't do anything for anybody. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
As it stands Brock is still strong. I think he will make more money for WWE over the next few years than Reigns would have. As he's shown recently, he's not ready to be a top baby |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
If babyfaces fail right after they succeed they are lousy babyfaces. Hard to imagine those people drawing. Imagine if the Heath Ledger Batman ending with him blowing up the two boats of citizens and inmates. Batman just shrugs into the camera and goes "oops" as credits role. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
( ._.)
Posts: 14,413
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm sure cat woman will be as big of a draw as batman
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Posts: 61,634
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Cesaro and Ambrose spring immediately to mind. I think Cesaro has beaten Rusev twice since he split up from Tyson Kidd. He's not being positioned as a Batman. Isn't it weird he isn't getting over? Ambrose constantly chokes when he gets a chance to put his hand on his nemesis, and then he just meanders around the wastelands shrugging. He's not being positioned as Batman. And, for that matter, no one is The Joker. Seth Rollins has been presented as fucking Kite Man. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
( ._.)
Posts: 14,413
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I didn't book it, Chris Nolan did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
( ._.)
Posts: 14,413
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Cena doesn't draw like he used to, it's time for someone new.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Network subs have been increasing year over year. Mania has sold out huge arenas every year with him on top. I dunno, what are the metrics that prove his time isn't now?
That said, WWE is clearly trying to find the next guy. They spent the better part of a year laying the groundwork for the Daniel Bryan run and through a fluke that didn't pan out. Before that they spent countless months trying to get Punk over as a headliner. He got to a certain level and couldn't maintain and ultimately burnt out. Roman Reigns has been pegged as a guy to potentially take over, but he hasn't gotten to the level they need. I'm sure this year they will try again (maybe another shot with Reigns, maybe someone else). And we'll see if that guy can fill John's boots. There should be no rush to push him aside just for the sake of doing it though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
( ._.)
Posts: 14,413
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Not saying do it tomorrow, no one can fill his shoes on the main roster, as of right now. But WWE should know the answer by WM32. If that answer is still "Cena" then I will continue not to watch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
( ._.)
Posts: 14,413
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I haven't watched for over a month so far...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Spammy Certified
Posts: 46,132
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
( ._.)
Posts: 14,413
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
TPWW's #3 Peep
Posts: 20,903
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You haven't missed anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Do Unto Others...
Posts: 2,086
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
So CyNick didnt answer a single point I made. Look at it his way.
My outlook isn't negative, its realistic. Social media doesn't mean shit for WWE and the rating is down. But I enjoy so much about the world of wrestling and WWE, and with doing the podcast I love wrestling maybe more than ever because we get so many different opinions of so many different topics that its fascinating to me. But I'm also well aware that fans like us here on a forum are the minority. And if the crowds were going wild for the current stuff, you'd be right to tell me to get over it and move on. But we're in the middle of either a transitional point in storylines, or, as it feels to a lot of people clearly, at a stage where there just isnt a lot to be excited about until Rumble time when things will be important again. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
The WWE You Tube page shows various clips from WWE shows, and at the end guess what it promotes? A little thing called the WWE Network. Do you know how many people watched those clips and decided to order WWE Network? I'll answer for you, you have no idea. You read some 4 point newsletter and think you understand how WWEs revenue streams work. Its hilarious to me. If you enjoy sorts entertainment then great, but you, and just about everyone on this sad sad place sound like you hate it. Maybe change your podcast to something you are excited about. I mean that's just me. I would never want to spend so much time on something I'm not enjoying like you guys do. But if you enjoy it, that's cool too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Spammy Certified
Posts: 46,132
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Last edited by Savio; 10-23-2015 at 09:43 PM. Reason: Wait no one could like TNA, sorry |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |||
|
Do Unto Others...
Posts: 2,086
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by hb2k; 10-24-2015 at 07:29 AM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You're trying to change the argument.
You said social media means shit. Which I know where you got that idea from but you won't admit it. Aside from that you made the fair point that advertising Austin's return solely on social media didn't bump television ratings. But I never argued that it would. What I think it BS is stating social media doesnt mean shit to WWE. Without access to WWE internal data you would have no idea about what benefits WWE gets from their highly successful activities on social media. Would television ratings have been higher if they promoted Austin on TV, maybe a little, but maybe the shock will have an impact down the road. Either way its irrelevant to the point that "social media means shit". As for The Network, it's increasing year over year. In business when you start a new venture you expect losses at first, but long term it pays off. The Network is still in its infancy. From a revenue perspective they are futher ahead now vs pre network with just ppv. Again, my earlier post was just tying the fact that social media likely does not "mean shit" to the success of the Network growth. As for your enjoyment of the product, I believe most people here like wrestling more than they let on. I think you fall into the category of people who like to cater to the negative crowd who want to spend 3 hours a week watching RAW and then get together and go this is shit. My belief is you enjoy it, but to be a cool kid in the IWC podcast world you have to be negative like your overlords who you try to emulate. But I could be way off. I'll give your podcast a listen and see if any of your arguments sound familiar. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Do Unto Others...
Posts: 2,086
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Didn't get the idea from anywhere, like I said, that's common sense as far as I see.
And Network revenue isn't ahead of pre-Network PPV revenue now at all, that's just a outright lie. As for my general opinion on things, think it's pretty cut and dry, not a negative bastard for the hell of it, but when something bad happens, got to call it like it is. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Best Poster
Posts: 57,073
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Kevin Sullivan brought up a great point. The company keeps bringing back old stars to boost ratings, but ends up reminding the audience that the current roster sucks.
Could you imagine if when Hogan and Savage were first brought in if Vince kept bringing up Pedro Morales, Bob Backlund and Bruno in big roles. Hogan and Savage might have never gotten so over. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Posts: 61,634
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Posts: 61,634
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I think CyNick thinks he's got you trapped, Vic...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
( ._.)
Posts: 14,413
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
lol i didn't watch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Resident drug enabler
Posts: 45,473
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I never claimed to be a sleuth
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Posts: 61,634
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Very craftily avoided, Vic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Posts: 3,755
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Really enjoyed (the hulu cut of) Raw. A wresting heavy show about wrestling was actually good. Now that Reigns has been pushed back into the main event, I'm hoping the Survivor Series screw job of Seth Rollins, with Reigns taking his place as hand picked face of the company goes in to motion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Former TPWW Royalty
Posts: 66,676
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Network subs up 62% YoY
The sky is falling!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Posts: 3,033
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Proving what exactly?
That people want to watch WWE PPVs for $10/month instead of the former substantially higher rates but care less and less about RAW? Shocker. People want to pay less for something they used to have to pay more for. Even more so if they feel that the quality has declined. Also, if so, that's not good for TV licensing or TV sponsorship revenues for WWE. Or maybe that people want to watch former WWE, WCW or ECW shows when the quality of the product was superior? Also, are these subscription increases primarily the result of the Network availability expanding into new markets or an increase in internet access? If so, that would no doubt likely result in higher year to year growth until most markets are reached. The point is, without specifics, Network subscriber growth alone isn't proof of anything. It certainly doesn't disprove the theory that WWE has for years had horrible quality booking and writing and that it's resulting in RAW's ratings dropping. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
2013 revenues - $508M 2014 revenues - $543M 2015 revenues - $492M (with a quarter to go) Yes ratings are down a bit, but it shows how small drops in ratings means very little to the overall picture, which is quite rosy at the moment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | ||
|
( ._.)
Posts: 14,413
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
( ._.)
Posts: 14,413
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Network subs have nothing to do with the Raw rating. Raw isn't shown live on the network.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
RIP SABU
Posts: 35,585
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I've thought for a while that maybe the answer isn't dropping the whole first hour, but maybe a half-hour. Still would give them plenty of time each week to build stars and storylines who are actually being used, while reserving Main Event and Superstars for the low and mid-card guys who would otherwise not get much if any TV time.
I honestly wish the brands were still split, because SD! just can't get outcof RAW's shadow, and no matter how great it is or how terrible, it always just sort of feels like a clone of RAW which is a waste of 2 hours every Thursday night, and that's a shame. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
You would have to increase the rating enough in the remaining two hours to justify USA increasing TV rights fees to cover the loss of the rights fees of the third hour. I don't think the math works. |
|
|
|
|