TPWW Forums  

Go Back   TPWW Forums > w r e s t l i n g > wrestling forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-16-2010, 03:58 PM   #41
St. Jimmy
Last of a Dying Forum
 
St. Jimmy's Avatar
 
Posts: 16,215
St. Jimmy got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)St. Jimmy got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)St. Jimmy got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)St. Jimmy got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)St. Jimmy got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)St. Jimmy got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)St. Jimmy got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)St. Jimmy got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)St. Jimmy got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)St. Jimmy got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)St. Jimmy got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)St. Jimmy got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)
Kane is terrible and needs to go home. Taker is alright because of his "Legendary" status. Sheamus is fantastic and I would definately love it to be him vs. Taker with a Title Uni at stake. The titles need to be unified and this "brand division" needs to end.
St. Jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2010, 04:05 PM   #42
Londoner
One Of A Kind
 
Londoner's Avatar
 
Posts: 22,178
Londoner puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Londoner puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Londoner puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Londoner puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Londoner puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Londoner puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Londoner puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Londoner puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Londoner puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innovator View Post
Jesus, some of you need to make up your mind. Do you want change and new superstars or not?
There are other ways to make new superstars, Sheamus i don't think is deserving of ending the streak anyway. Plus Cena/Taker would be more entertaining, and i rarely say that about cena.
Londoner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2010, 04:07 PM   #43
Volare
Da Gif/Pic Pimp
 
Volare's Avatar
 
Posts: 13,913
Volare makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Volare makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Volare makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Volare makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Volare makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Volare makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Volare makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Volare makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Volare makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Volare makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Volare makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Volare makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Volare makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
I think it needs to be the future of WWE. Biggest show of the year with a match that important needs to be done by people with credibility, but will also be around for awhile.

Sheamus is great don't get me wrong, but is still a little green. (no pun intended)
Volare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2010, 04:26 PM   #44
XL
Feeling Oof-y
 
XL's Avatar
 
Posts: 17,151
XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)XL makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowden View Post
Why would they do Sheamus/Taker for the title? The streak match is always a huge draw, and I don't see any reason to use two big bullets (along with the title unification) in the same match.

Sheamus/Taker can book itself, so can the unification. Keep em separate.
This. I hate when they throw the title into a fued that is hot enough without it.
XL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2010, 06:03 PM   #45
Fox
"Ask him!"
 
Fox's Avatar
 
Posts: 10,072
Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)
Sheamus would not be seen as any kind of a threat to the Undertaker's WM undefeated streak, and therefore would not pose any kind of threat to Undertaker's Undisputed Title victory. The idea of both of those things should be that there is at least a question of who is going to walk out with the Undisputed Title/Taker's streak - this match would eliminate both of those things.

They'll probably do it.
Fox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2010, 11:24 PM   #46
Droford
 
Posts: 52,478
Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fox View Post
Sheamus would not be seen as any kind of a threat to the Undertaker's WM undefeated streak, and therefore would not pose any kind of threat to Undertaker's Undisputed Title victory. The idea of both of those things should be that there is at least a question of who is going to walk out with the Undisputed Title/Taker's streak - this match would eliminate both of those things.

They'll probably do it.
If Sheamus can hold on to the Belt until Wrestlemania, he will have held the belt for 11 out of 15 months (and 9 months straight since Fatal 4 Way) since he first won at TLC back in 2009. They could totally hype him as being the most dominant champion in recent WWE history. He will have beaten Cena/Orton/Jericho/Edge and possibly (and most importantly) HHH and whoever else they can come up with. So you obviously have Sheamus beating everyone RAW has to offer and wanting a challenge, what better than vs Taker at Wrestlemania?

They should totally eliminate the predictability factor by having both champions wrestle twice like WM X and Vengance 2001, especially since the Winner of the Royal Rumble needs to get a title match. So it ends up being a mini 1 night tourney. Sheamus beats, lets say HHH and Taker beats..um..whoever..most people would probably figure on HHH would beat Sheamus like he did last year. Sheamus winning would instantly get the "OMG could he be the one?" reaction from the crowd. Taker also has to win two matches in the same night which would be even more epic for his streak.


Of course they'll fuck this up and have HHH beat Sheamus when he comes back.
Droford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2010, 02:55 PM   #47
Nark Order
Soundly Defeated Wadding
 
Nark Order's Avatar
 
Posts: 40,590
Nark Order makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Nark Order makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Nark Order makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Nark Order makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Nark Order makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Nark Order makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Nark Order makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Nark Order makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Nark Order makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Nark Order makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Nark Order makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Nark Order makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Nark Order makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Cena/Taker pretty much HAS to happen at Wrestlemania, and who knows how many UT has left in him. It's the only match I can think of off the top of my head where I legitimately couldn't pick the winner, despite the streak. Maybe Trips/UT also.
Nark Order is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2010, 04:19 PM   #48
Dark-Slicer Diago
The Darkness Has Awoken
 
Dark-Slicer Diago's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,619
Dark-Slicer Diago is good (20,000+)Dark-Slicer Diago is good (20,000+)Dark-Slicer Diago is good (20,000+)Dark-Slicer Diago is good (20,000+)Dark-Slicer Diago is good (20,000+)Dark-Slicer Diago is good (20,000+)Dark-Slicer Diago is good (20,000+)Dark-Slicer Diago is good (20,000+)
Triple H and Undertaker was at X7, I don't think they'll make Taker fight 3 different people at 2 Wrestlemania's, they already did that with Kane and Shawn Michaels.
Dark-Slicer Diago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2010, 12:59 AM   #49
crusnik
 
Posts: 192
crusnik does not have that much rep yet (10+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowden View Post
Why would they do Sheamus/Taker for the title? The streak match is always a huge draw, and I don't see any reason to use two big bullets (along with the title unification) in the same match.

Sheamus/Taker can book itself, so can the unification. Keep em separate.
agreed
crusnik is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®