![]() |
![]() |
#41 |
Last of a Dying Forum
Posts: 16,215
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Kane is terrible and needs to go home. Taker is alright because of his "Legendary" status. Sheamus is fantastic and I would definately love it to be him vs. Taker with a Title Uni at stake. The titles need to be unified and this "brand division" needs to end.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
One Of A Kind
Posts: 22,178
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
There are other ways to make new superstars, Sheamus i don't think is deserving of ending the streak anyway. Plus Cena/Taker would be more entertaining, and i rarely say that about cena.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
Da Gif/Pic Pimp
Posts: 13,913
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think it needs to be the future of WWE. Biggest show of the year with a match that important needs to be done by people with credibility, but will also be around for awhile.
Sheamus is great don't get me wrong, but is still a little green. (no pun intended) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,151
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This. I hate when they throw the title into a fued that is hot enough without it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
"Ask him!"
Posts: 10,072
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sheamus would not be seen as any kind of a threat to the Undertaker's WM undefeated streak, and therefore would not pose any kind of threat to Undertaker's Undisputed Title victory. The idea of both of those things should be that there is at least a question of who is going to walk out with the Undisputed Title/Taker's streak - this match would eliminate both of those things.
They'll probably do it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 | |
Posts: 52,478
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
They should totally eliminate the predictability factor by having both champions wrestle twice like WM X and Vengance 2001, especially since the Winner of the Royal Rumble needs to get a title match. So it ends up being a mini 1 night tourney. Sheamus beats, lets say HHH and Taker beats..um..whoever..most people would probably figure on HHH would beat Sheamus like he did last year. Sheamus winning would instantly get the "OMG could he be the one?" reaction from the crowd. Taker also has to win two matches in the same night which would be even more epic for his streak. Of course they'll fuck this up and have HHH beat Sheamus when he comes back. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
Soundly Defeated Wadding
Posts: 40,590
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Cena/Taker pretty much HAS to happen at Wrestlemania, and who knows how many UT has left in him. It's the only match I can think of off the top of my head where I legitimately couldn't pick the winner, despite the streak. Maybe Trips/UT also.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
The Darkness Has Awoken
Posts: 2,619
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Triple H and Undertaker was at X7, I don't think they'll make Taker fight 3 different people at 2 Wrestlemania's, they already did that with Kane and Shawn Michaels.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 | |
Posts: 192
![]() |
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |