![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Has the move to 3 hours been a good one? | |||
| Good Move |
|
18 | 41.86% |
| Bad Move |
|
25 | 58.14% |
| Voters: 43. You must log in or register to vote on this poll. | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#41 |
|
New Arcade God
Posts: 6,751
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
How fortunate that this is one point readily available and hardly a secret.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Cranky Kong
Posts: 78,671
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I never said anything about the people who care about ratings. My sentiments were my own on ratings. Nice try, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Quark is Less Impressed.
Posts: 38,371
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
A few more random matches that don't mean anything other than just wrestling. They haven't had those since WCW Nitro started.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Quark is Less Impressed.
Posts: 38,371
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Out Of Step
Posts: 12,059
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I remember most 3 hour Nitros being fairly good, solid undercard/midcard storylines, hit or miss main event.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Quark is Less Impressed.
Posts: 38,371
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It was unsustainable. It burned them all of them out and WWF won because of it. Besides the announcers never even talked about the matches going on anyways, so they didn't really have solid storylines except talking about the NWO all night long.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Out Of Step
Posts: 12,059
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
DDP/Raven/Benoit feud was during the three hour Nitros wasn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Out Of Step
Posts: 12,059
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Just because the announcers didn't always focus solely on the match in front of them instead of shilling the main event doesn't mean there weren't storylines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 |
|
TPWW's HHH Mark Since '04
Posts: 29,886
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Nitro went 3 hours from January 26, 1998–December 27, 1999 (according to Wikipedia). It wasn't the 3 hours that hurt them. It was horrible fucking shows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
TPWW's HHH Mark Since '04
Posts: 29,886
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Going back to 2 hours in 2000 didn't help them either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Inno Knows.
Posts: 43,710
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Good tv = good tv, regardless of time.
For the WWE, it's good in the sense that they're gaining additional revenue for the 3rd hour. For the writing team and fans, it's close to burn out when you factor in Smackdown, and Main Event and Superstars to a lesser degree. It is tough with 5 hours of weekly tv to not overexpose characters, many whom aren't compelling to begin with. They really should be calling up more people to fill the quota they need. |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Best Poster
Posts: 57,072
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I don't think many watch Main Event or Superstars. The top stars are gonna be on Raw/Smackdown regardless of time, but it has given more T.V time to mid card guys who I enjoy: Slater, PTP, etc..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Best Poster
Posts: 57,072
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
the problem with 3 hour Nitro's was it was the same thing every friggen week. They used to do spot 3hour Nitro's and it was treated like a big deal.
Every 3 hour Nitro: Luchadors fighting each other ever week Top card guys fighting JTTS Techinal match featuring the same guys Main event featuring an NWO run in Now on its own it's solid action, but if it's the same thing week fter week, it gets tiresome. Nobody fought anybody different. Rey vs Juvy is awesome, but not week after week. |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 | |
|
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,151
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
They have enough time and more than enough characters, they just seem to lack enough ideas to fill three hours. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Black Sheep Jew
Posts: 8,859
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Grim Fandango
Posts: 5,192
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The core cast hasn't really expanded that much, some guys have been getting more time but there's only ever a handful of characters that are doing something and everyone else is still filler. Overall it's a meh, which I guess falls more into bad than good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 | |
|
Large Marge sent me
Posts: 32,402
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
MVP Mark
Posts: 16,451
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I enjoy it. I do not watch the entire show but I did not do that when it was 2 hours long. The extra hour gives me more chances to flip back to RAW and see what is going on. Sure there are recaps popping up but those do not bother me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 | |
|
Best Poster
Posts: 57,072
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,151
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well, obviously. But that's nothing to do with Raw being expanded to three hours. That's just Slater being God.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Quark is Less Impressed.
Posts: 38,371
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
To anybody who Put "bad move" do you think they would have had a 20+ minute match with Daniel Bryan, Orton and Kane Vs. the Shield if they didn't have 3 hours to spend? Hell no. Wrestling for wrestling's sake on a wrestling show is a good thing. If they start having longer matches on Raw they can gain more stamina and endurance to have longer matches on PPVs.
WCW's three hours were bad because like Gertner said they showed the same old shit every week. Even a great cruiserweight match can get old fast. How many of us remember "YOU CAN'T POWER BOMB KIDMAN!?" They did the same match every week. |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
TPWW's HHH Mark Since '04
Posts: 29,886
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Just remember, when RAW was only 3 hours on "special nights" we got stuff like this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,151
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I love the longer matches (for the most part), I just feel they should be getting more people over with the time they have available. For example, we should have a robust tag team division with depth, a good 6-7 teams all competing/working their way up to the titles. The extra time should allow them to build more than one "flavour of the month" challenger(s).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Quark is Less Impressed.
Posts: 38,371
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The problems with tag teams aren't just the time needed to establish them. There aren't many people who want to share the stage with a partner. Also it only seems they form teams just to break them up for one of them to be the big star. It's a 50/50 shot of being the big star like Shawn Michaels and the Miz or falling into obscurity like Marty Jannetty and John Morrison.
I don't ever remember a time they had 6-7 teams who legitimately had a shot at winning the title even in the 1990s, 2000s or ever. |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
TPWW's HHH Mark Since '04
Posts: 29,886
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
They have enough tag teams. Tag Team wrestling has never been and never will be a major focus for WWE. Plus, the business is different and you don't have as many real tag teams who have been partners for awhile coming up through the system. We've seen repeatedly that you just can't throw 2 guys together and they instantly are a great tag team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
TPWW's HHH Mark Since '04
Posts: 29,886
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'd argue that plenty of people are over. When is the last time WWE has pushed as many younger/newer guys as they are now?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Best Poster
Posts: 57,072
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Yeah I don't see how anybody can honestly say it's a bad move.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Quark is Less Impressed.
Posts: 38,371
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Can't really recall this many younger/newer guys that weren't in a large group like the Spirit Squad Or the Nexus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Embracing the deception..
Posts: 1,227
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
They need to showcase as many wrestlers as they can. Smackdown needs to serve to cater to the younger talent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
MVP Mark
Posts: 16,451
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Thankfully we have a 3 hour show so the Shield will still be relevant while this new Wyatt Family thing takes off. Instead of having them class early they can keep their distance due to having extra time in the show.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 | |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Kind of funny, I remember a time where I would have loved more wrestling, and this much would have seemed like a dream come true. Careful what you wish for, I guess. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Inno Knows.
Posts: 43,710
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I think it's that plus the pairings. They kept going back to the same matches over and over again. The minute I saw Wade Barrett vs. Orton or Dolph vs. Kofi, I'd change the channel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
GD Maniac
Posts: 9,571
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I've been a fan of it. Good for Orton
|
|
|
|
|
|
#76 |
|
GD Maniac
Posts: 9,571
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
So yeah overall I vote good move
|
|
|
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Posts: 3,743
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Sans the more advertising i'd say it's better there has been less squash matches and they have been able to showcase more of their roster.
Last edited by XCaliber; 07-11-2013 at 11:21 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Posts: 64
![]()
|
I put in "bad move", but it depends really. It's a bad move because they have done away with the brand split, so a lot of the time, you see the same wrestlers on Smackdown as you would see on Raw. It becomes overexposure.
If they used different storylines on Smackdown with different performers, I wouldn't be against it. For example, according to the spoilers, Smackdown this week is just going to be the same guys who fought on Raw (from Money in the Bank) but in different combinations. I don't think they need to keep the rosters completely seperated. Just focus on different storylines depending on the shows to give a little something to everyone. Get more wrestlers the exposure they need to show what they can do. |
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Cranky Kong
Posts: 78,671
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Smackdown could definitely use something to set it apart, but I still like Raw at three hours. There's seemingly at least one great match every week.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#80 | |
|
TPWW's HHH Mark Since '04
Posts: 29,886
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|