![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Will Brock/Taker III be a gimmick match? | |||
Yes, probably HELL in a CELL |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 45.00% |
Yes, Casket Match |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 10.00% |
Yes, Buried Alive Match |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 10.00% |
Biker Taker returns for "Biker's Chain match" |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 10.00% |
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 20.00% |
Yes, Texas DEATH Match |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 15.00% |
Yes, Texas Strap Match |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Yes, TLC match |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 20. You must log in or register to vote on this poll. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
Father of Hinduship
Posts: 21,083
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
From a kayfabe perspective, it gets Lesnar pissed off and emotionally invested in wanting to destroy Taker (as opposed to Taker randomly calling out Lesnar via satellite sometime in January/February 2016, with Lesnar smiling and saying, "I already kicked your ass, I got nothing to prove to you buddy! ![]() As far as Taker challenging Brock at Mania goes, I'm not sure how the WWE will play it out. Maybe this coming Monday on RAW, Undertaker challenges Lesnar to Mania' and states himself that, "if I can't beat you at Mania', I will retire" (both Taker and Lesnar are in the ring). Heyman gets Lesnar to shake Taker's hand to agree to it. They do. Immediately after however, Lesnar "low blows" Taker (revenge for low-blow) and beats the living shit out of Taker. [perhaps this comes across as heelish to the fans, so that the fans don't interpret Undertaker being a clear cut heel heading into Mania]. The WWE suspends Lesnar as result of his actions until February. Quote:
As far as Brock goes, I don't think the fans really care that Brock hasn't won since RR 2015. He still has that presence and respect amongst the fans. Lesnar absolutely dominated both Reigns and Rollins in their matches, and kayfabe wise, the fans know that he only lost due to unforeseen circumstances. Lesnar is still credible as fuck. However - if Lesnar was in the main-event of Wrestlemania this year and lost CLEANLY, then yes, he would lose some credibility. On the flip side, if you have Lesnar destroy Reigns or Rollins for the title at Mania', then it hurts the development of Reigns/Rollins as future credible "franchise guys" for the WWE. That's why I like the idea of keeping Lesnar away from Reigns/Rollins until 2017. During 2016, you can have Lesnar get more dominating victories over other wrestlers, while on the other side, building up Reigns and/or Rollins as credible #1 guys in the company. If Lesnar ends Taker's career at Mania however, it further adds to Brock's credibility and accomplishments. That's how I see it. And yes - I know Taker has done some heelish/cowardly things against Lesnar thus far, but I just can't see people in his own home state booing Taker.....especially if there's a built in implication/stipulation that it will be Taker's last match. The WWE loves their poignant moments and if they can re-create HBK-Flair or Taker-HBK, via Lesnar-Taker, then I think they'll do it (along with giving Taker a Flair-esque send off on RAW the next night). |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Posts: 61,533
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I was all for the Brock/Taker SummerSlam match. It makes total sense for Taker to look for revenge against Lesnar. Well, if not "revenge" then certainly "retribution." He's the big dog and Brock taking the streak challenges that.
I wasn't a fan of the shenanigans at SummerSlam. I would have preferred Brock got the clean win and asserted himself as the dominant guy in WWE. Where you run into problems with this is that you have nothing keeping Brock from the WWE Title. They booked themselves into a corner with it. The best solution I could come up with was Brock beating Taker, and actually selling a bit of respect for him (remember that Brock does not respect anyone). Then you could have had a new Wyatt Family consisting of Bray Wyatt, Luke Harper and either Roman Reigns or Dean Ambrose (depending on which one you want to turn heel) laying out both guys to set them up as the dominant heel force moving forward. Now, I know many would not like that idea -- but the Brock is pissed so he is not going to be around thing makes him look like a bit of a diva. And I don't really feel the need to see Brock vs. Taker again, because I feel that Brock got the streak (arguably the biggest win you can get), and that Taker got to prove that this could still be his yard. I'm not really feeling the tension that these two have something real to fight over. As I type this, I feel that maybe having the World Title involved would help things. But I think I'd rather just skip the whole match together and just have Taker lock up with someone else that could get a rub from being in a program with him, whilst Brock fights someone fresh and interesting that has long legs ahead of him so you could kind of buy them putting The Beast down. But that's just me and my subjective opinion. I think the book should be closed on Brock vs. Taker. I think we're going into a fourth act here after a false climax. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Trickster Demon
Posts: 59,823
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
wtf why didn't I make Tuxedo Match an option?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
RIP SABU
Posts: 35,541
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
#YesMovement
Posts: 11,640
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
WM 32
Put Taker with Cena. Taker's Last Match. Brock against a Returning Daniel Bryan. Brock vs Taker at SS should have been it. I realize the way the ending was booked there kinda has to be another match, I just hope it isn't at Mania. Maybe Rumble? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Posts: 18,357
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Why are we assuming WWE has to explain why Taker disappears the next six months? Since when have they addressed why Taker disappears for a year, or maintained heat continuously on matches booked a year in advance (re: Cena vs The Rock)?
They'll just pretend we're too dumb to question the lack of logic. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
RIP SABU
Posts: 35,541
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Poignant moments at the end of a "10 stars outvof 5" kind of match are great.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Posts: 6,269
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |