![]() |
|
|
#41 |
|
Tongue my Fartbox
Posts: 5,363
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It kinda reminds me of that nerdy guy that used to accompany the bushwhackers, can't remember his name offhand. Wwe sure can churn out some crap\recycled gimmicks though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
...IN HD!!!!
Posts: 23,327
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Jameson!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
Tongue my Fartbox
Posts: 5,363
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Oh yeah thats it, wonder whatever happened him. Probably being sodomised by the genius still after that vicious boot to the shin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
SEX APPEAL
Posts: 13,830
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I weep for OVW.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
Father of Hinduship
Posts: 21,083
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
I wasn't trying to imply that the Val Venis gimmick was 'stupid'. I do however, believe that it would've been impossible for Val Venis to become a MAIN-EVENTER with that gimmick (or atleast be accepted amongst the fans as a main-eventer with that gimmick). In terms of getting initial attention however, I think Val Venis' gimmick was excellent. It was unique (to some degree), and it got him a lot of attention. If the WWE had intentions of pushing Val as a main-eventer however, then a new gimmick was needed (which is one reason why they always changed Val's gimmick when he made his heel turns). Is Dunsmore's gimmick stupid? Yes.........one could definitely argue that. However.......can this gimmick potentially get him INITIAL attention? (due to the uniqueness and comedy associated with it). Yes. Is this a 'gimmick' that one could use as a main-eventer? No. HOWEVER..........he can always have a gimmick change. Wrestlers have done this all the time. Triple H has re-invented himself on numerous occassions. Stone Cold used to be the Ring Master. Edge has re-invented himself,........as did Buh Buh Ray Dudley when he dropped the stuttering. Not too long ago, Dave Batista was Deacon Batista. The CyNick - you argue that perhaps a 'less talanted' wrestler should get a gimmick like this. I have to say the following to that - how many times do you see a talanted wrestlers (with no gimmick or a 'bland' gimmick) get held back because of that? Time after time again, we have seen great WRESTLERS get held back due to a 'bland' gimmick. Think about guys like Dean Malenko for instance. Think about Lance Storm. My opinion - give this gimmick a shot. At worst, the WWE can always change it.........and the fans won't give a sh>it, just as they didn't with Triple H, Austin, Batista, etc. |
|
|
|
|