![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Which show was your favorite? | |||
Vintage Championship Wrestling |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 33.33% |
Lethal Action Wrestling |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 11.11% |
Dead Wrong Wrestling |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 22.22% |
This Is Wrestling |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 5.56% |
Superb Championship Wrestling |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 27.78% |
Voters: 18. You must log in or register to vote on this poll. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#81 | |
Amazon Affiliate
Posts: 42,694
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I don't really agree with your psychology on the whole thing. Bad guys can't go over clean? Your assumptions of who the #1 heels and #1 baby-faces are. ![]() Just saying. You're being a little hostile all things considered. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#82 |
Cranky Kong
Posts: 78,671
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
So what? Somebody should be hostile. Every company is always gonna have hostile viewers. Roll with the punches and fix what YOU think he was right about.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#83 |
Amazon Affiliate
Posts: 42,694
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
...I'm just saying it seems forced. It seems like he's trying to be insulting and not just being insulting naturally.
It's his constitutional right to hate everything we present him but, he doesn't have to fake it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#84 |
Hazardous to Your Health
Posts: 21,730
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well even if he is totally wrong, then take solace in the point that he is being wrong about everyone. Doesn't change anything again, does it?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#85 | |
Over Like Rover
Posts: 38,444
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Like I said:
Quote:
And yeah, I guess it was kind of 'Angry Wrestling Nerd' because it's Wrestling Nerd game on Wrestling Nerd forum. Don't worry, I don't hate you or want to piss on your kids or anything. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#86 |
I'm Brllnt!
Posts: 3,139
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Did anyone start or send in their next episode?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#87 |
Cranky Kong
Posts: 78,671
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I've received two week two episodes so far.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#88 | |
Amazon Affiliate
Posts: 42,694
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
What would work better would be if he pointed out logical errors, things that just turned him sour (just because) and format issues. As I said, he has the right to hate everything but, when he tries to be "funny" about it nothing really gets better. "I hate your roster" isn't valid here because a) drafts are a gamble, you never know if you'll get a roster that's popular with anyone here. Our task is to take a roster, make the wrestlers into viable characters in order to helm a weekly wrestling show in hopes of getting the fans to watch. However, as is evidenced by wrestling audiences over the years in various companies, there is such a thing as a niche. TNA fans went to TNA shows forever and were ridiculously excited about things I personally have shit upon. They have fans that love their style of matches and show a good deal of brand loyalty (although those fans are being shit on now by TNA management). So pretending to know how certain fans would react to a certain match is also silly. No fan-group is the same. There are stupid fans, there are Canadian fans and there are ECW fans turned into smarks who shit on everything. You don't know if one match would go over versus another for a crowd, all you know is that it would suck for you. Which is the point of judging...ahem. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#89 |
I'm all there is
Posts: 31,811
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
CSL wasn't all negative with his comments. I thought it was a pretty fair review. He commented on things he liked and things he didn't like. Didn't come off as him trying to knock everything at all. Lots of points agreed with my points.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#90 |
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,151
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
"Constructive Criticism" is all good - even if there is very little of it in some of the reviews - but I find it's always a little reassuring to mention stuff that you did like (if anything) otherwise the hardwork just seems like it's been for nought.
Thing is, it's difficult to rebute or explain your moves without letting everyone know which show is yours. One thing I do wish is that people stopped focusing on the "name value" of the characters (e.g. I'm not interested in Segment A cos I can't stand Wrestler A". Our rosters are based on a draft, we didn't get everyone we wanted to. We can rue about not getting who we wanted but our job is to write a good storyline for whoever we did get. IMO, judge the story/angle not the character. There are some excellent rosters amongst the shows but if the writing is shit then there's no point having Angle, Miz, Punk, etc. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#91 |
I'm all there is
Posts: 31,811
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
one thing I really agree with CSL on is I'd like to see you guys create new characters for some of these guys. Use your creativity and not the same character the WWE/TNA already has for the guy. That's why I loved what the guy who developed LAW did. He took Tarver and Cottonwood and instantly gave them fresh gimmicks. That's what I excpect. Not so much with main eventers, but with midcard guys.
I feel bad because I keep harping on VCW, but if he has the USO's cut a promo telling the fans a little more about who they are and what they are about, that match is a lot stronger. Instead it's just like any other match on Velocity. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#92 |
Reigning Tipsters Champ!
Posts: 2,088
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yeah, I can see what people are saying and why they are saying it in all cases. That is what makes this so interesting in my opinion. Everyone will have different opinions on what entertains them and what they expect from the promoter. You will never please everyone, but the art will come in pleasing and appeasing as many people as possible. The answer is probably having quite a varied show.
The problem comes, like XL is saying, in having a roster hurt by the draft (that in itself is part of the task though and I think people will learn some lessons in how they make their choices for season 2), but there are two important points I think and they have both been noted here in some way already. Firstly, people who are judging will have to understand that some people's rosters could be quite a long way from what they wanted, but in those cases, i would expect two things from the promoter. The first being a build for the stars they do have, because all five of you have your established stars and in my opinion they MUST be used to build the new stars, especially since many of you have your fed directly after WWE/TNA era and you need to use the wrestlers we all know to the best of your ability. The second point is what LC is saying, not getting the roster you wanted is a chance to be creative. I REALLY want to see what Tarver will do next after one simple paragraph, depending on what he does in the next few shows, i would buy a PPV with a fight between him and someone else I have a vested interest in. Another example is the Edge feud...Edge being used to put the spotlight on Hawkins/Archer. There is an angle there with someone I am a fan of involved, so now I have an interest on how Hawkins (a throwaway pick for many people) will explain himself and where things will go from here. For those of you who have the stars, you HAVE to use them and put them in a feud we all want to see (because just having them in your fed does very little - see TNA). For those who don't, give me a reason to care and want to watch the guys you do have. Really looking forward to Week 2 like I said, everyone has some really good stuff on their shows and I think Week 2 will be even better and more competitive. keep up the good work lads! (Including AT and the judges!!!) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#93 |
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,151
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
See, that is constructive. Some very good points there Fallen & LC
![]() Last edited by XL; 07-26-2010 at 07:28 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |