![]() |
|
|
#81 | |
|
He's Here
Posts: 60,735
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Source: http://www.100megsfree4.com/wiawrest.../impactrat.htm August 23, 2006 0.8 August 30, 2006 0.8 September 7, 2006 0.7 September 14, 2006 0.7 September 21, 2006 ?.? September 28, 2006 0.88 * -- The Impact after the announcement on PPV October 5, 2006 0.8 October 12, 2006 0.9 October 19, 2006 0.8 * -- Angle's TV Debut October 26, 2006 0.8 November 2, 2006 0.8 November 9, 2006 ?.? November 16, 2006 1.0 November 23, 2006 0.9 November 30, 2006 1.0 December 7, 2006 1.0 December 14, 2006 1.2 December 21, 2006 1.1 December 28, 2006 0.9 January 4, 2007 1.1 January 11, 2007 1.1 January 18, 2007 1.1 January 24, 2007 0.8 January 31, 2007 1.0 February 8, 2007 1.1 February 15, 2007 0.6 February 22, 2007 1.0 March 1, 2007 1.1 March 8, 2007 1.0 March 15, 2007 1.1 At ABSOLUTE MOST, he gave them a .3 in viewership (over time). Realistically, I don't think anyone could bump TNA past a 2, no matter how many debuted at the same time and no matter how big they were. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Herp a derp, and so on
Posts: 8,830
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Wow. So this is what a RAW thread would look like if it had Tourette's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
emerge
Posts: 16,710
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
lol
What about Rock and stone cold? you don't think one of them would make it above a 2? |
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
He's Here
Posts: 60,735
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
No. At best, it would be a temporary bump into the mid-2's and they would plummet back down at, at most, 1.5.
The star power is there and then some. They could EASILY be hitting 3's right now if they got their shit together. |
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
emerge
Posts: 16,710
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
well they'd get .3 x3 possibly and that'd be .9
maybe but yeah this is such an awful Promotion I don't know what the fuck they need to do. |
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
He's Here
Posts: 60,735
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Foley, Van Dam and Double J are not equal to Kurt Angle. Maybe a .3 with REALLY good booking (50% coming from Van Dam). But even then, if they continue on this path they'll eventually hit a ceiling where they can't get any new viewers on name power alone. Which is why I believe the limit is somewhere in the low 2's.
What they need to do is fire the entire booking team, hire a new one and get rid of Carter. Right there would clear up 90% of the shit easily (assuming they don't hire the Spongebob rejects who tried to get into WWE but couldn't cut it). Last edited by Xero; 09-14-2008 at 11:33 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
emerge
Posts: 16,710
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
yeah but they'd still have a lot of loose ends to tie up.
And I doubt they'd get rid of carter or the booking team, so I think they're screwed, it's because Jeff Jarret is too nice a guy to get rid of Don West and other people who have been there the whole time. I lived near him when he lived in Chattanooga and he went to church (when he was in town) at one of my friend's churches, everytime I've been around him he is so nice. He, scott hall, Kevin Nash, and Scott steiner helped my friend change a flat one time because they saw him stranded on the side of the road, this was before WCW went down. Jarrett is a saint and he deserves nothing of what's happened to him recently, he deserves TNA to be amazing, but he won't get it because he is too nice and not ruthless. |
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
yeah nah good mate
Posts: 1,499
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Clox, you really don't seem in-touch with reality. A lot of your previous comments were proof enough, IMO, but this stuff on how much the ratings would jump? Ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
emerge
Posts: 16,710
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I don't have any idea what ratings mean in any way shape or form to be honest. I was just making random assumptions based on RVD 4.20
|
|
|
|