![]() |
![]() |
#81 |
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,151
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
And thus winning a "Triple Crown" in today's WWE is irrelevant...which leads nicely to the question that we are discussing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#82 |
That's Not My Name
Posts: 9,086
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
They most certainly did. They didn't use the term "Triple Crown" but when Bret Hart completed it in 1992, they brought up that he was only the second guy ever to do it, and cited Pedro Morales as the first. They mentioned it again when Diesel became the first guy to do it in under a year.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#83 |
He's Here
Posts: 60,735
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I also just saw a Morales match where they mentioned the fact he was the first to hold all three titles.
I guess this comes down to whether they actually need to use the term "Triple Crown", because with that and Carl's post the idea of the triple crown was pushed. And let's face it, that's just splitting hairs. So deal with it Destor, the Triple Crown exists, or at least did, in kayfabe and thus brings it back up to where the Grand Slam was. Though this is all moot now, since it means even less than it did when the Grand Slam or Triple Crown were the only deal in town. Last edited by Xero; 01-20-2009 at 07:39 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#84 |
Spammy Certified
Posts: 46,124
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
does this question even need to be asked?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#85 |
You can't teach that
Posts: 19,337
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The Triple Crown should be wiped away, and now replaced with winning all 3 brand titles.
So Punk needs WWE title, Taker, Edge and HHH need the ECW title, Kane needs the WHC, Big Show needs WHC, Jericho needs ECW, and I think that is it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#86 |
That's Not My Name
Posts: 9,086
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
WWE Champion - all brands l IC Champion - Raw * US Champion - SmackDown * TV Champion - ECW lll WWE World Tag Team Titles - Raw lllll WWE Women's Champion - SmackDown That is all they need. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#87 |
That's Not My Name
Posts: 9,086
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The Triple Crown would be replaced by the Quintuple Crown.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#88 |
You can't teach that
Posts: 19,337
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Also known as a Grand Slam
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#89 |
Get a poke on
Posts: 35,234
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Diminished, yes. Lost, I would say not completely.
It's all very hard to determine anyways. It depends on what you thought it originally meant. Of course as time goes on it's going to expand. That's like asking if the 500 hr or 3000 hit club has lost meaning. Not just because the membership goes up over time naturally, but because there's a tainted era. It's a crapshoot. So as far as current WWE title/triple crown worth goes, I'd say accomplishing it now means a bit less than before, but it still does require winning a world title. Although winning a world title may be twice as easy as it was back then, it's still winning a world title. To me, the triple crown is stupid anyways since whether or not you win a tag team title doesn't neccesarily determine your worth as a wrestler. It just means you were half of an over tag team, or were packaged in one after you got over. IC title is a far less exclusive club. So it all comes down to the World title. It only really means as much as that does. There's plenty of wrestlers who are high up in worth and accomplishment who aren't triple crown, or even world champions. Straps can be deceiving. I still like to think it means something. Some would say title belts don't matter very much anyways since they're props that vary in meaning over eras. Being a world champion may mean less now than it did 5 years ago. However, being a world champ 10 years ago may mean more than it did 15 years ago. There'd be a solid argument for that. So whatever. I prefer Grand Slam if anything, but it's hard to prove any meaning. Last edited by Jeritron; 01-21-2009 at 02:29 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |