NFL 2007 Season Thread - Page 51

**Jesus Shuttlesworth** · 11-07-2007, 12:14 AM

I still don't understand how you are calling the Patriots for little girls for looking into this, when you yourself posted a clip and asked "If this legit I am gonna be pissed"

Why wouldn't they want to investigate it? It's not like they brought all this up during the post-game press conference or something.

What's worse? Investigating a random decrease in sound or complaining to the NFL about an uncovered field?

RP · 11-07-2007, 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sTiMa34

I still don't understand how you are calling the Patriots for little girls for looking into this, when you yourself posted a clip and asked "If this legit I am gonna be pissed"

Why wouldn't they want to investigate it? It's not like they brought all this up during the post-game press conference or something.

What's worse? Investigating a random decrease in sound or complaining to the NFL about an uncovered field?

I'd say there about the same

BTW, i call them little girls cause i want to start shit with you guys. Thats pretty much always my motivation, but i also think the Patriots are the last people to start pointing fingers at other people for cheating.

**SammyG** · 11-07-2007, 02:20 AM

Stima has a point.

**Jesus Shuttlesworth** · 11-07-2007, 11:44 AM

Yeah I don't know why you brought me up there, did I say anywhere that this was the biggest game ever or anything? I don't think I did. It was just week 9 (which is exactly what I said before the game started) I'd rather see them win than lose obviously, but it's not like they just won the Superbowl on Sunday. I just think its funny how you claim to be classy (lol - who cares if you are though, you have no impact on the game/the Colts) and not have sour grapes but then start to call the Patriots little girls because are investigating a suspect sound decrease during the broadcast.

I don't know why I waste my time trying to talk about this shit with you though, I didn't realize you where on the Krispy mindset 'I'm just trying to start shit' I guess people can't discuss sports when their favorite team is involved, its like 4th grade all over again when being dumb is cool or something.

**VonErichLives** · 11-07-2007, 12:25 PM

RP - you're right, it was just a regular season game. What makes it big and always does with these two is it typically decides the #1 and #2 playoff spots and the Patriots have difficulty playing in Indy and Indy has trouble playing in NE (especially if it's the usual mid/late december weather in new england).

But it is still just regular season, and didn't take either team out of the playoffs.

That being said, you're making excuses for a regular season game you really don't care about... "injuries" and "dropped pass" and "we gave you the game", you can say that about anyone who loses. "They gave the game away" yeah, by not winning.

The Pats have had injuries over the years, sometimes then win, sometimes they lose... but we never use the injuries as an excuses like you're trying to.

Maybe last year if we had Harrison, Maybe if the Refs didn't call pass interferance on Ellis Hobbs which the NFL later apologized for that it was a bad call, maybe if Reche Caldwell knew how to catch... see, we can both play this game... but it's the NFL you play with the team you have.

What you need to worry about is not dropping another game, because then instead of that week 1 bye and homefield advantage, you could be going to Pittsburg the 2nd round of the playoffs, which weather wise ain't much better then New England that time of year.

and last of course everyone is talking about this Pats team as being great, they're undefeated which always starts the "can they go 16-0" crap, and they're set to smash some offensive records, and to top it off they just beat the regining super bowl champs on their homefield. So yeah, that's why everyone is talking Pats.

RP · 11-07-2007, 12:46 PM

You already played that game dumb ass. Thats why i typed that shit. The threads are still on the forum. People can go back and read about all your BS.

**Kris P Lettus** · 11-07-2007, 04:36 PM

Saints have played two awesome games in a row, which I missed both of, b/c of work.. Brees finnally has his stride back and Reggie has been carrying the load nicely without Deuce.. O-line is clicking and the WR's are catching balls for a change.. D-backs still get beat but the front seven have been playing great..

Anyway, I can't wait for Sunday.. If you guys remember the last meeting between us and the (ass)Rams, Mike Furrey pretty much won the game by snatching the ball from a DOWN Ernie Conwell, while Conwell was on the ground, holding the ball up, showing the ref he made a first down catch, during a last drive..

NFL.com has it as

"Last meeting
On Oct. 23, 2005, the Rams got a 67-yard interception return for a touchdown from defensive back Mike Furrey (now a wide receiver for the Lions) to knock off the visiting Saints, 28-"17."

Horrible, horrible game..

I can't wait for Sunday..

Here's to 12-4..

WHO DAT??

**SammyG** · 11-07-2007, 04:46 PM

You're retarded if you think you're gonna go 12-4. You're going 9-7 max. And I would not be suprised if we beat you on Sunday.

**Kris P Lettus** · 11-07-2007, 05:12 PM

lol

r u serious

We put up 450 yards on a stout AFC D.. No way y'all are going to beat us..

Nov 11	vs. ST. LOUIS RAMS	12:00PM	FOX
Nov 18	@ HOUSTON TEXANS	12:00PM	FOX
Nov 25	@ CAROLINA PANTHERS	12:00PM	FOX
Dec 02	vs. TAMPA BAY BUCCANEERS	12:00PM	FOX
Dec 10	@ ATLANTA FALCONS	7:30PM	ESPN
Dec 16	vs. ARIZONA CARDINALS	12:00PM	FOX
Dec 23	vs. PHILADELPHIA EAGLES	12:00PM	FOX
Dec 30	@ CHICAGO BEARS	12:00PM	FOX

The only game I'm worried about is the Bucs.. Every other team left on our scheduel has key injuries and/or not near playing up to their potential.. If we play like we did the past two weeks, we could easily beat every team left this year..

Tell me which three of those teams are going to beat us??

p.s. we are favored by like 14 FYI..

**Kris P Lettus** · 11-07-2007, 06:29 PM

Sorry, I was mistaken, it was 538 total yards on offense, not 450..

**Jeritron** · 11-07-2007, 08:56 PM

It's not even worth arguing to me. There's no comparison really. Yes they're the second best team and give us the hardest run for our money, and they won the superbowl once (after a game we clearly blew, just saying).
The Patriots have and continue to have The Colts beat as the greatest team of the past 15 years.
And to be honest, The Patriots are on route to become the best of all time. If they aren't already.
I think it's annoying and frustrating to the Patriots when this isn't recognized, or the national media markets The Colts and Manning.
Think about it, they had the longest winning streak of all time.
They won 3 superbowls in 4 years, with impressive seasons afterwards.
They're on track to quite possibly winning a 4th.
They could go 16-0 for the second time in history, with far more authority and an eventual 19-0 which beats 17-0

**OssMan** · 11-07-2007, 09:15 PM

opie and anthony reported that brady got suspended for 4 games and boston media flipped out

**Jesus Shuttlesworth** · 11-07-2007, 09:33 PM

**VonErichLives** · 11-07-2007, 10:02 PM

can't wait till Brady breaks mannings TD record, wins league MVP and another super bowl ring.

Then I'll love to hear RP's argument of how Manning is the better QB.

**Kris P Lettus** · 11-07-2007, 10:29 PM

Truthfully, I think either of them could be better than the other any given Sunday.. Brady is on a streak now and his supporting cast are all playing great football ATM..

**RoXer** · 11-07-2007, 10:29 PM

Hey nice, I'm going to the Cards game this week.

But, it's the Lions...

**Jesus Shuttlesworth** · 11-08-2007, 12:31 AM

Lions are nice

**SammyG** · 11-08-2007, 02:39 AM

So ur implying that ur gonna lose, right Roxer?

**RoXer** · 11-08-2007, 02:48 AM

Who? No. What?

**SammyG** · 11-08-2007, 03:00 AM

If you're playing the Lions, you are losing.

**Ninti the Mad** · 11-08-2007, 09:47 AM

TANK JOHNSON

**Jesus Shuttlesworth** · 11-08-2007, 10:55 AM

Good pick up for Dallas, he is coming really cheap and will be a good fit for their defense. I heard something about his contract where if he does fuck up they can just completely cut ties with him and be done with it.

Just a random thought...where do you guys think Derek Anderson will be playing next season?

**Kris P Lettus** · 11-08-2007, 11:51 AM

I wish the Saints had gone after Johnson.. I mean, even with his off field drama he is a dominant interior lineman who good at both stopping the run and pass rushing..

Derek Anderson is playing very well.. If I were the Browns GM I'd try to keep him and Quinn.. Prolly even start him over Quinn next year just to ride the momentum.. I was never that impressed with Quinn at ND.. He's aiight but without WR like Samarja (sp) he wouldn't have had near the numbers he did.. He was a mediocre QB at a big football school, with a good line and WR corps.. If they don't keep Anderson, I see him going somewhere like the Phins or the Vikings..

**SammyG** · 11-08-2007, 12:28 PM

He doesn't have that bad of a WR core in Cleveland...

**Kris P Lettus** · 11-08-2007, 12:34 PM

I understand that but he never impressed me at ND.. And with the way Anderson is playing, why fix what aint broke??

**Jesus Shuttlesworth** · 11-08-2007, 07:01 PM

San Diego did it.....as did the Bengals, I can't see them sticking with Anderson over Quinn, just because of how the business of the NFL works

However, I'm not sure how big Quinn's contract is, he was a late first rounder so they might able to hold onto both. The Packers have done that thus far

**Gonzo** · 11-08-2007, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sTiMa34

San Diego did it.....as did the Bengals, I can't see them sticking with Anderson over Quinn, just because of how the business of the NFL works

However, I'm not sure how big Quinn's contract is, he was a late first rounder so they might able to hold onto both. The Packers have done that thus far

The Packers starting QB is also Brett Favre. That might have something to do with it.

**Kris P Lettus** · 11-08-2007, 07:07 PM

"Big Baby" Charles Grant is not gonna play Sunday due to his ankle still being sore.. He could play but they'd rather sit him and allow the ankle to get healthy, than having him keep playing hurt..

**SammyG** · 11-08-2007, 10:22 PM

Little is out for the season

**McLegend** · 11-08-2007, 10:43 PM

I would just like to say Brady Quinn had a terrible offensive live at Notre Dame.

**DrA** · 11-08-2007, 11:05 PM

I like Derek Anderson, just for the fact that he was considered trash on a trash team until just a couple of weeks ago. He has really stepped up his game, and if I were Cleveland, I would keep this guy over Quinn. But that isn't going to happen, and I feel that he would be a nice pick up a team like Baltimore or Chicago who needs a boost at that position. He has that Tony Romo feel to him: a no name who was finally given a chance and now is doing well because of it.

RP · 11-09-2007, 01:10 AM

Derek Anderson is for real. He's better then Manning this year for sure. I think he's a top 3 QB right now. I cant see how you bench that guy for Quinn. Quinn isnt guaranteed to be a great QB. He could be pretty average. Anderson is only a few years older. He has a heck of a career ahead of him. The Browns would be absolute morons to get rid of him.

RP · 11-09-2007, 01:11 AM

I actually thing Anderson has more of Brady feel then Romo. I think the Browns are really dangerous this year. Anderson is the real deal.

**VonErichLives** · 11-09-2007, 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RP

I actually thing Anderson has more of Brady feel then Romo. I think the Browns are really dangerous this year. Anderson is the real deal.

Who would have thought Romeo Cronnel would build a better offense then Charlie Wies.

**Supreme Olajuwon** · 11-09-2007, 02:35 AM

Anderson is only 24 so as long as this doesn't end up being a fluke season for him the Browns would be insane to give Quinn the starting job

although if any team was going to do it, shouldn't it be Cleveland

**Gonzo** · 11-09-2007, 09:28 AM

Fuck it if Anderson keeps playing well, I would deal Quinn. At least thats what I would do. NFL politics are stupid sometimes.

**Kris P Lettus** · 11-09-2007, 04:15 PM

So Sirius NFL Radio is reporting that Reggie Bush is questionable for Sunday..

RP · 11-09-2007, 04:19 PM

Someone offered me Frank Gore and Chad Johnson for Reggie Bush

**Kris P Lettus** · 11-09-2007, 04:34 PM

Well, Reggie is gonna has more yards on the ground than Gore and more recieving yards than Ocho Cinco, so you'd be stupid to make that trade..

**Kris P Lettus** · 11-09-2007, 04:44 PM

Not really but I wouldn't trade him..

11-08-2007, 10:55 AM	#22
Jesus Shuttlesworth Posts: 42,765	Good pick up for Dallas, he is coming really cheap and will be a good fit for their defense. I heard something about his contract where if he does fuck up they can just completely cut ties with him and be done with it. Just a random thought...where do you guys think Derek Anderson will be playing next season? Last edited by Jesus Shuttlesworth; 11-08-2007 at 11:03 AM.

11-08-2007, 07:07 PM	#28
Kris P Lettus Listen to Killer Mike Posts: 56,741	"Big Baby" Charles Grant is not gonna play Sunday due to his ankle still being sore.. He could play but they'd rather sit him and allow the ankle to get healthy, than having him keep playing hurt.. Last edited by Kris P Lettus; 11-08-2007 at 07:10 PM.

11-07-2007, 12:14 AM	#1
Jesus Shuttlesworth Posts: 42,765	I still don't understand how you are calling the Patriots for little girls for looking into this, when you yourself posted a clip and asked "If this legit I am gonna be pissed" Why wouldn't they want to investigate it? It's not like they brought all this up during the post-game press conference or something. What's worse? Investigating a random decrease in sound or complaining to the NFL about an uncovered field?

11-07-2007, 02:20 AM	#3
SammyG LAKE SHOW HOES Posts: 25,768	Stima has a point.

11-07-2007, 11:44 AM	#4
Jesus Shuttlesworth Posts: 42,765	Yeah I don't know why you brought me up there, did I say anywhere that this was the biggest game ever or anything? I don't think I did. It was just week 9 (which is exactly what I said before the game started) I'd rather see them win than lose obviously, but it's not like they just won the Superbowl on Sunday. I just think its funny how you claim to be classy (lol - who cares if you are though, you have no impact on the game/the Colts) and not have sour grapes but then start to call the Patriots little girls because are investigating a suspect sound decrease during the broadcast. I don't know why I waste my time trying to talk about this shit with you though, I didn't realize you where on the Krispy mindset 'I'm just trying to start shit' I guess people can't discuss sports when their favorite team is involved, its like 4th grade all over again when being dumb is cool or something.

11-07-2007, 12:25 PM	#5
VonErichLives DU's illegitimate brother Posts: 3,685	RP - you're right, it was just a regular season game. What makes it big and always does with these two is it typically decides the #1 and #2 playoff spots and the Patriots have difficulty playing in Indy and Indy has trouble playing in NE (especially if it's the usual mid/late december weather in new england). But it is still just regular season, and didn't take either team out of the playoffs. That being said, you're making excuses for a regular season game you really don't care about... "injuries" and "dropped pass" and "we gave you the game", you can say that about anyone who loses. "They gave the game away" yeah, by not winning. The Pats have had injuries over the years, sometimes then win, sometimes they lose... but we never use the injuries as an excuses like you're trying to. Maybe last year if we had Harrison, Maybe if the Refs didn't call pass interferance on Ellis Hobbs which the NFL later apologized for that it was a bad call, maybe if Reche Caldwell knew how to catch... see, we can both play this game... but it's the NFL you play with the team you have. What you need to worry about is not dropping another game, because then instead of that week 1 bye and homefield advantage, you could be going to Pittsburg the 2nd round of the playoffs, which weather wise ain't much better then New England that time of year. and last of course everyone is talking about this Pats team as being great, they're undefeated which always starts the "can they go 16-0" crap, and they're set to smash some offensive records, and to top it off they just beat the regining super bowl champs on their homefield. So yeah, that's why everyone is talking Pats.

11-07-2007, 12:46 PM	#6
RP King of Love and Piss Posts: 62,993	You already played that game dumb ass. Thats why i typed that shit. The threads are still on the forum. People can go back and read about all your BS.

11-07-2007, 04:36 PM	#7
Kris P Lettus Listen to Killer Mike Posts: 56,741	Saints have played two awesome games in a row, which I missed both of, b/c of work.. Brees finnally has his stride back and Reggie has been carrying the load nicely without Deuce.. O-line is clicking and the WR's are catching balls for a change.. D-backs still get beat but the front seven have been playing great.. Anyway, I can't wait for Sunday.. If you guys remember the last meeting between us and the (ass)Rams, Mike Furrey pretty much won the game by snatching the ball from a DOWN Ernie Conwell, while Conwell was on the ground, holding the ball up, showing the ref he made a first down catch, during a last drive.. NFL.com has it as "Last meeting On Oct. 23, 2005, the Rams got a 67-yard interception return for a touchdown from defensive back Mike Furrey (now a wide receiver for the Lions) to knock off the visiting Saints, 28-"17." Horrible, horrible game.. I can't wait for Sunday.. Here's to 12-4.. WHO DAT??

11-07-2007, 04:46 PM	#8
SammyG LAKE SHOW HOES Posts: 25,768	You're retarded if you think you're gonna go 12-4. You're going 9-7 max. And I would not be suprised if we beat you on Sunday.

11-07-2007, 06:29 PM	#10
Kris P Lettus Listen to Killer Mike Posts: 56,741	Sorry, I was mistaken, it was 538 total yards on offense, not 450..

11-07-2007, 08:56 PM	#11
Jeritron Get a poke on Posts: 35,234	It's not even worth arguing to me. There's no comparison really. Yes they're the second best team and give us the hardest run for our money, and they won the superbowl once (after a game we clearly blew, just saying). The Patriots have and continue to have The Colts beat as the greatest team of the past 15 years. And to be honest, The Patriots are on route to become the best of all time. If they aren't already. I think it's annoying and frustrating to the Patriots when this isn't recognized, or the national media markets The Colts and Manning. Think about it, they had the longest winning streak of all time. They won 3 superbowls in 4 years, with impressive seasons afterwards. They're on track to quite possibly winning a 4th. They could go 16-0 for the second time in history, with far more authority and an eventual 19-0 which beats 17-0

11-07-2007, 09:15 PM	#12
OssMan The Classic Dylan Staples Posts: 51,539	opie and anthony reported that brady got suspended for 4 games and boston media flipped out

11-07-2007, 09:33 PM	#13
Jesus Shuttlesworth Posts: 42,765

11-07-2007, 10:02 PM	#14
VonErichLives DU's illegitimate brother Posts: 3,685	can't wait till Brady breaks mannings TD record, wins league MVP and another super bowl ring. Then I'll love to hear RP's argument of how Manning is the better QB.

11-07-2007, 10:29 PM	#15
Kris P Lettus Listen to Killer Mike Posts: 56,741	Truthfully, I think either of them could be better than the other any given Sunday.. Brady is on a streak now and his supporting cast are all playing great football ATM..

11-07-2007, 10:29 PM	#16
RoXer History's Greatest, Mr. E Posts: 42,425	Hey nice, I'm going to the Cards game this week. But, it's the Lions...

11-08-2007, 12:31 AM	#17
Jesus Shuttlesworth Posts: 42,765	Lions are nice

11-08-2007, 02:39 AM	#18
SammyG LAKE SHOW HOES Posts: 25,768	So ur implying that ur gonna lose, right Roxer?

11-08-2007, 02:48 AM	#19
RoXer History's Greatest, Mr. E Posts: 42,425	Who? No. What?

11-08-2007, 03:00 AM	#20
SammyG LAKE SHOW HOES Posts: 25,768	If you're playing the Lions, you are losing.

11-08-2007, 09:47 AM	#21
Ninti the Mad Mad as in crazy, dumbass Posts: 27,739	TANK JOHNSON

11-08-2007, 11:51 AM	#23
Kris P Lettus Listen to Killer Mike Posts: 56,741	I wish the Saints had gone after Johnson.. I mean, even with his off field drama he is a dominant interior lineman who good at both stopping the run and pass rushing.. Derek Anderson is playing very well.. If I were the Browns GM I'd try to keep him and Quinn.. Prolly even start him over Quinn next year just to ride the momentum.. I was never that impressed with Quinn at ND.. He's aiight but without WR like Samarja (sp) he wouldn't have had near the numbers he did.. He was a mediocre QB at a big football school, with a good line and WR corps.. If they don't keep Anderson, I see him going somewhere like the Phins or the Vikings..

11-08-2007, 12:28 PM	#24
SammyG LAKE SHOW HOES Posts: 25,768	He doesn't have that bad of a WR core in Cleveland...

11-08-2007, 12:34 PM	#25
Kris P Lettus Listen to Killer Mike Posts: 56,741	I understand that but he never impressed me at ND.. And with the way Anderson is playing, why fix what aint broke??

11-08-2007, 07:01 PM	#26
Jesus Shuttlesworth Posts: 42,765	San Diego did it.....as did the Bengals, I can't see them sticking with Anderson over Quinn, just because of how the business of the NFL works However, I'm not sure how big Quinn's contract is, he was a late first rounder so they might able to hold onto both. The Packers have done that thus far

11-08-2007, 10:22 PM	#29
SammyG LAKE SHOW HOES Posts: 25,768	Little is out for the season

11-08-2007, 10:43 PM	#30
McLegend Temporary Posts: 15,618	I would just like to say Brady Quinn had a terrible offensive live at Notre Dame.

11-08-2007, 11:05 PM	#31
DrA Posts: 24,537	I like Derek Anderson, just for the fact that he was considered trash on a trash team until just a couple of weeks ago. He has really stepped up his game, and if I were Cleveland, I would keep this guy over Quinn. But that isn't going to happen, and I feel that he would be a nice pick up a team like Baltimore or Chicago who needs a boost at that position. He has that Tony Romo feel to him: a no name who was finally given a chance and now is doing well because of it.

11-09-2007, 01:10 AM	#32
RP King of Love and Piss Posts: 62,993	Derek Anderson is for real. He's better then Manning this year for sure. I think he's a top 3 QB right now. I cant see how you bench that guy for Quinn. Quinn isnt guaranteed to be a great QB. He could be pretty average. Anderson is only a few years older. He has a heck of a career ahead of him. The Browns would be absolute morons to get rid of him.

11-09-2007, 01:11 AM	#33
RP King of Love and Piss Posts: 62,993	I actually thing Anderson has more of Brady feel then Romo. I think the Browns are really dangerous this year. Anderson is the real deal.

11-09-2007, 02:35 AM	#35
Supreme Olajuwon You know that�s right Posts: 52,766	Anderson is only 24 so as long as this doesn't end up being a fluke season for him the Browns would be insane to give Quinn the starting job although if any team was going to do it, shouldn't it be Cleveland

11-09-2007, 09:28 AM	#36
Gonzo feel the madness Posts: 11,360	Fuck it if Anderson keeps playing well, I would deal Quinn. At least thats what I would do. NFL politics are stupid sometimes.