MLB 2005 Season Thread - Page 30

**Loose Cannon** · 09-21-2005, 10:21 PM

Oh how things have changed.

First. Place.

**The Miz** · 09-21-2005, 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SeventyTimes7

Sox take out the Indians tonight.

Print it.

Hey good call bro

**Loose Cannon** · 09-21-2005, 10:33 PM

Chi Sox are fucked. They got to deal with the Twins, while The Tribe plays KC again. Only 2.5 games back if they hang on tonight. We may see a change there as well in a few days.

**McLegend** · 09-21-2005, 10:33 PM

Ryan Howard is the man

**The Miz** · 09-21-2005, 10:57 PM

KC is playing better and Twins still have a AAA offense. I like the White Sox to win the division but by 1.5 or so

**Joey Slugs** · 09-21-2005, 11:18 PM

god tonight sucked.

what a difference a day makes.

**BCWWF** · 09-22-2005, 12:36 AM

Radke and Stewart are both done playing, but the White Sox aren't going to walk over the Twins, they have to face Santana, who always dominates, and they haven't been playing superb ball lately either...

**BCWWF** · 09-22-2005, 12:38 AM

Needless to say, I think the White Sox will still make the playoffs as well, because either the Yankees or Red Sox is going to lose that last series, and with a race this close it will be hard to make the playoffs while losing the final series.

RP · 09-22-2005, 04:59 AM

My gut feeling says the Houston Astro's are gunna be the Champs this year. Mark it down.

**VonErich Lives** · 09-22-2005, 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loose Cannon

Oh how things have changed.

First. Place.

Fenway Park 9/30-10/2 Best of 3, Winner take all, Looser goes home.

Well, at least after tonight the "1/2 game" will be done.

The Sox get a well needed night off. 30 games in 30 days, I think they went like 17-13.

Yanks are finishing the season with 20 in a row.

The sox have one of, if not the best home record this year? (thought I heard they had the best)

Sox have last 7 at home, Yanks have last 7 on the road.

Sox in Baltimore, then Toronto and NYY at home.
NYY Host Toronto and in Baltimore and at Boston.

This is gonna be fun.

I hope they go into it tied, wanna see a "best of 3".

**VonErich Lives** · 09-22-2005, 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loose Cannon

Oh how things have changed.

First. Place.

Fenway Park 9/30-10/2 Best of 3, Winner take all, Looser goes home.

Well, at least after tonight the "1/2 game" will be done.

The Sox get a well needed night off. 30 games in 30 days, I think they went like 17-13.

Yanks are finishing the season with 20 in a row.

The sox have one of, if not the best home record this year? (thought I heard they had the best)

Sox have last 7 at home, Yanks have last 7 on the road.

Sox in Baltimore, then Toronto and NYY at home.
NYY Host Toronto and in Baltimore and at Boston.

This is gonna be fun.

I hope they go into it tied, wanna see a "best of 3".

**BCWWF** · 09-22-2005, 02:06 PM

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/column...son&id=2168811

I like the first paragraph

**VonErich Lives** · 09-22-2005, 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCWWF

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/column...son&id=2168811

I like the first paragraph

16 less HR's, 40 less RBI's then David Ortiz.

He does have a BA .08 better then Ortiz.

If there's enough problems giving it to Ortiz cause he's a DH, how do you give it to a DH with worse stats?

**The Miz** · 09-22-2005, 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VonErich Lives

16 less HR's, 40 less RBI's then David Ortiz.

He does have a BA .08 better then Ortiz.

If there's enough problems giving it to Ortiz cause he's a DH, how do you give it to a DH with worse stats?

VEL seriously this is one of your dumbest, least thought out posts ever. Did you ever think that it's possible that Ortiz could have a few more at-bats than Hafner? Because he has 115 more. If Hafner had 115 more AB's, don't you think he just might have more RBI's? Did you consider any stats other than the 3 listed, all 3 completely useless?

Some other stats
OPS
David Ortiz: 1.012
Travis Hafner: 1.008

OBP
DO: .396
TH: .412

Ortiz has better HR/PA and is a better power hitter. Should we give him the MVP because of that? If their OPS are identical why does it matter? And Ortiz plays in the park that was rated #1 in Park Factor for Hitters last year while Hafner plays in #25.

But more importantly, where would the Indians be without Hafner? Where would the Red Sox be without Ortiz? It's safe to say the Red Sox would be in much better shape Ortiz-less. They would be worse obviously but they still have Damon, Manny, Renteria, etc. Who anchors Cleveland's offense without Hafner? He is their best power threat and only legitamate #4 hitter. Without him, they would not be anywhere near the White Sox or the Wild Card.

Hafner gets my MVP vote before Ortiz.

**CNM** · 09-23-2005, 12:14 AM

Hafner is obviously the man but I think you're understating how clutch Ortiz has been for the Red Sox. Yes, without him they'd still have Manny, Damon, etc. but none of those guys have been nearly as clutch. My vote would rest on who gets his team into the playoffs.

**CNM** · 09-23-2005, 12:17 AM

Before people go off on me, I'd vote for A-Rod if the Yanks get into the playoffs before both Ortiz and Hafner.

**BCWWF** · 09-23-2005, 12:29 AM

A-Rod is probably still my guy too, but that was just an interesting article.

**The Outlaw** · 09-23-2005, 04:00 PM

Yeah Hafner has been unbelievable. I was very surprised he wasn't listed in the MVP talks. If he would have been healthy all year, we might not be having this "debate".

**McLegend** · 09-23-2005, 10:37 PM

Phillies down by 1 in the Wildcard

**VonErich Lives** · 09-23-2005, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Miz

VEL seriously this is one of your dumbest, least thought out posts ever. Did you ever think that it's possible that Ortiz could have a few more at-bats than Hafner? Because he has 115 more. If Hafner had 115 more AB's, don't you think he just might have more RBI's? Did you consider any stats other than the 3 listed, all 3 completely useless?

Some other stats
OPS
David Ortiz: 1.012
Travis Hafner: 1.008

OBP
DO: .396
TH: .412

Ortiz has better HR/PA and is a better power hitter. Should we give him the MVP because of that? If their OPS are identical why does it matter? And Ortiz plays in the park that was rated #1 in Park Factor for Hitters last year while Hafner plays in #25.

But more importantly, where would the Indians be without Hafner? Where would the Red Sox be without Ortiz? It's safe to say the Red Sox would be in much better shape Ortiz-less. They would be worse obviously but they still have Damon, Manny, Renteria, etc. Who anchors Cleveland's offense without Hafner? He is their best power threat and only legitamate #4 hitter. Without him, they would not be anywhere near the White Sox or the Wild Card.

Hafner gets my MVP vote before Ortiz.

Yep, missed looking at the AB's assumed with his name coming up he had played all year. The fact that he didn't does change the numbers but it also changes his qualification for MVP.

Simply, he hasn't been there all season to help his team.

Ortiz does and has put the sox over the top, he Wins games for them all the time, and not the "8-0 garbage time home run".

That being said, as much as I'd lover to give it to Ortiz, I'd still now give the nod to A-rod because of the field play.

So they vote when the season is over, if the AL East comes down to the last 3 games, and A-rod or Ortiz his 1 or 2 game winnng HR's think that will influence people?

**VonErich Lives** · 09-23-2005, 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CNM

Before people go off on me, I'd vote for A-Rod if the Yanks get into the playoffs before both Ortiz and Hafner.

What if the Yanks don't? If they miss the playoffs would you still vote for him?

**VonErich Lives** · 09-23-2005, 10:42 PM

So, what happens in a multie tie?

I've heard a few rumors but not an exact rule.

Let's say the Sox and Yanks tie for the AL East
The Indians and White Sox Tie for the AL Central.

The 4 teams have the same records.

I've heard 2 things.

1) The 2 divison teams play each other in a playoff to decide the Divison, and then losers then play each other for the Wild Card.

2) The divison is decided by head to head record and the two non-div winners play each other for the Wild Card.

Anyone have more info?

**The Miz** · 09-23-2005, 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VonErich Lives

Yep, missed looking at the AB's assumed with his name coming up he had played all year. The fact that he didn't does change the numbers but it also changes his qualification for MVP.

Simply, he hasn't been there all season to help his team.

That is ridiculous. Hafner can't help that he was injured.

So if Ortiz missed 2 weeks and Hafner played the whole season you would give the MVP to Hafner before Ortiz, right VEL? Of course not, that argument is retarded.

Both are excellent candidates but the Indians are barely a .500 they'd be much better off than Cleveland.

Hafner Sept numbers: 10, 24, 1.203
Ortiz Sept numbers: 10, 22, 1.152

**BCWWF** · 09-24-2005, 02:22 AM

You don't have to play the whole season to be considered. Shannon Stewart got votes when he was on the Twins for a half season because he singlehanded brought them back into the playoff race. The Red Sox aren't some magnificent powerhouse this season, just because Ortiz has good numbers doesn't automatically make him the MVP.

**VonErich Lives** · 09-24-2005, 03:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Miz

That is ridiculous. Hafner can't help that he was injured.

So if Ortiz missed 2 weeks and Hafner played the whole season you would give the MVP to Hafner before Ortiz, right VEL? Of course not, that argument is retarded.

Both are excellent candidates but the Indians are barely a .500 they'd be much better off than Cleveland.

Hafner Sept numbers: 10, 24, 1.203
Ortiz Sept numbers: 10, 22, 1.152

No Miz, your math is retarded.

1) 115 AB's in 2 weeks, that's one hell of a 2 weeks, Did they play triple headers?

2) He's having a better Sept, a month that isn't over and a last I checked the season started in April?

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCWWF

You don't have to play the whole season to be considered. Shannon Stewart got votes when he was on the Twins for a half season because he singlehanded brought them back into the playoff race. The Red Sox aren't some magnificent powerhouse this season, just because Ortiz has good numbers doesn't automatically make him the MVP.

I never said he shouldn't be considered, I said I'd give it to Ortiz or A-rod before him.

getting "some votes" doesn't mean he won MVP and doesn't mean in my opinion he should be, nor does it mean he deserves it more then Ortiz or A-rod.

You're right, the Red Sox aren't some magnificent powerhouse, which is more the reason for Ortiz.

Hey, you guys have your opinions, I have mine.

While September is a huge month, what A-rod had better numbers then he has now, same team, except say A-rod has 5-10 more HR's, 20 more RBI's and oh yeah, the Yanks are 10 games up and already clinched?

So are you two now telling me if your not in a "tight pennent race" you can't be MVP?

If you don't help your team into the playoffs you can't be MVP?

**The Miz** · 09-24-2005, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VEL

No Miz, your math is retarded.

1) 115 AB's in 2 weeks, that's one hell of a 2 weeks, Did they play triple headers?

2) He's having a better Sept, a month that isn't over and a last I checked the season started in April?

This is a joke, right VEL? Are you actually this dumb? Have you ever looked up stats or facts or anything to back up what you are talking about?

TRAVIS HAFNER MISSED TWO WEEKS DUE TO INJURY. THAT IS AN UNDISPUTABLE FACT. A 5 minute search of MLB.com or ESPN will find this to be true. Obviously not all of the 115 AB's came in those 2 weeks, he has had various days off throughout the season. Boston also has a better offense than Cleveland, hence more AB's for their hitters.

THE WHOLE POINT OF THE SEPTEMBER NUMBERS WAS THAT THEY ARE ALMOST IDENTICAL. Hafner does not have "better numbers". 2 more RBI's and about .100 higher OPS. Ortiz can co 4-4 HR 2B tomorrow and surpass Hafner's numbers. Hafner and Ortiz are both having amazing Septembers, the most important month. Yes, the season does start in April. I already posted their season stats which you ignored.

Are you ok VEL?

**VonErich Lives** · 09-24-2005, 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Miz

This is a joke, right VEL? Are you actually this dumb? Have you ever looked up stats or facts or anything to back up what you are talking about?

TRAVIS HAFNER MISSED TWO WEEKS DUE TO INJURY. THAT IS AN UNDISPUTABLE FACT. A 5 minute search of MLB.com or ESPN will find this to be true. Obviously not all of the 115 AB's came in those 2 weeks, he has had various days off throughout the season. Boston also has a better offense than Cleveland, hence more AB's for their hitters.

THE WHOLE POINT OF THE SEPTEMBER NUMBERS WAS THAT THEY ARE ALMOST IDENTICAL. Hafner does not have "better numbers". 2 more RBI's and about .100 higher OPS. Ortiz can co 4-4 HR 2B tomorrow and surpass Hafner's numbers. Hafner and Ortiz are both having amazing Septembers, the most important month. Yes, the season does start in April. I already posted their season stats which you ignored.

Are you ok VEL?

I'm fine, clearly being a Seattle fan has you confused about sports.

You brought up the 115 AB and the 2 weeks.

Yes, September CAN be important, but what if a team is in a crappy divison and has things wrapped up by September 1st and their star player leads the league or top 3 in offense, good defense even gold glove and has won many games with his offense. Does that player not get MVP because they maybe had a bad September when there was nothing on the line?

Really, keep repeating yourself all you want, I understand you don't have much to talk about with the Mariners, Seahawks, Sonics... So, keep going.

But I still give the award to Ortiz or A-rod before Hafner.

**The Miz** · 09-24-2005, 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VonErich Lives

I'm fine, clearly being a Seattle fan has you confused about sports.

What does Seattle have to do with anything? I love when posters are clearly losing arguments to me and start to talk about the Mariners even if there is no relation.

Quote:

Originally Posted by VEL

You brought up the 115 AB and the 2 weeks.

Let's break this down:
1. David Ortiz has 115 more at bats than Travis Hafner.
2. Travis Hafner missed 2 weeks in July with a face injury. This missed time cause him to miss probably 50-60 at bats.
3. Travis Hafner has had several days off throughout the season which has caused him to have even less at-bats than Ortiz.
4. Nowhere did I state that all of 115 at-bats came in the 2 weeks. You assumed that, then put your brain on double-duty and made a clever crack about triple headers.
5. Part of your argument for Ortiz being better was that he had more HR's and RBI's. By your logic, Brad Wilkerson has been a better power hitter than Barry Bonds this year.
6. I then brought up the stats OBP and OPS which are averages and therefore not penalizing to someone with less AB's. You had no response to these stats.
7. You stated that you would give it to Ortiz over Hafner because "[Hafner] has not been there all year to help his team". I asked you this question: If David Ortiz missed 2 weeks due to injury like Travis Hafner had, would you then select Travis Hafner as your MVP? Would you consider Ortiz not a worthy candidate because he wasn't there all year to help his team? I'm still waiting for an answer.

Quote:

Originally Posted by VEL

Yes, September CAN be important, but what if a team is in a crappy divison and has things wrapped up by September 1st and their star player leads the league or top 3 in offense, good defense even gold glove and has won many games with his offense. Does that player not get MVP because they maybe had a bad September when there was nothing on the line?

This applies to neither Hafner, Ortiz, nor Rodriguez so I'm not sure why you're asking me this but I'll answer anyway. I would vote a guy MVP if he had a shitty September but his team had wrapeed up the division like then, but only if he was the catalyst when the team took the huge lead. If the Red Sox had a 15 game lead on the Yankees entering Sept and Ortiz hit .210 in Sept I would not take it away from him, granted that he had a monster stretch and led the team when Boston got that 15 game lead.

Quote:

Originally Posted by VEL

Really, keep repeating yourself all you want, I understand you don't have much to talk about with the Mariners, Seahawks, Sonics... So, keep going.

Yawn. Who was better last year, Sonics or Celtics? Yeah. And the Seahawks made the playoffs last year and are in a good position to this year. Am I not entitled to an opinion if 1 of the 3 teams I like is bad? Another failed attempt at being funny with a cheap shot. You are dumb.

**RoXer** · 09-24-2005, 04:34 PM

Ffffffuck da Rangers

**The Miz** · 09-24-2005, 05:19 PM

lol Buck is an asshole. He rolled over for the Angels and is managing this series like the playoffs because he is an A's hater.

**YOUR Hero** · 09-24-2005, 07:42 PM

Miz, that's a shitty thing to say. The players wouldn't respect him and he'd get fired if that were the case. Players don't lie down and if they thought their manager was trying to make them loose they would be a revolt.

**The Miz** · 09-24-2005, 09:15 PM

I don't think they were trying to lose. I think they were giving an average effort against the Angels and are trying really hard to beat the A's.

**VonErich Lives** · 09-24-2005, 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Miz

Am I not entitled to an opinion

Bing, bing, bing... winner...

Give the guy a cupie doll.

You're the jerk who started with the name calling like it somehow made your point, then when I lower to your level and return a few shots you cry. Seriously, do you need a crying towel?

and The Sonics are a good team because they had a better record then the Celtics? So, then that would make the seahawks a bad team because they did worse then the Pats?

Anyway, you finally seemed to find a clue in that quote.

You are entitled to your opinion, which has been my point for the last couple of posts, but you've been too busy trying to take cheap shots and slip in name calling to read what I said.

It's my opinon, I'm not saying he's not qualafied, I'm saying that in my opinion, I'd give it to Ortiz or A-rod before him.

So clearly, since it's not ok for me to have my opinion, then my answer to your question is "NO", you're not entitled to an opinion.

**The Miz** · 09-24-2005, 11:10 PM

Where did I "cry" VEL? Combatting your incorrect comments with fact is crying? I guess I've been crying this whole thread then.

Quote:

Originally Posted by VEL

and The Sonics are a good team because they had a better record then the Celtics? So, then that would make the seahawks a bad team because they did worse then the Pats?

LOL WHAT? We're talking about the 2005 season right? Do you watch basketball? The Sonics not only had a better record in a much tougher conference but advanced to the second round in said conference. The Celtics were a first round exit against a #6 seed who lacked their best player. Yes, the Sonics were a good team. Not because they had a better record than the Celtics. They won their division and advanced to the second round, losing only to the team that won the NBA Finals. The Sonics were a good team.

I used the words "bad" or "good" nowhere. I simply said that Sonics > Celtics. And obviously Pats > Hawks. That doesn't mean the Hawks were bad they were just much shittier than the Pats.

Yes you're entitled to your opinion, you have provided no support for it which is why you're looking dumb here. You originally said that Hafner had worse stats than Ortiz, then when I provided meaningful stats to combat your pointless ones you didn't respond. Then you said Hafner couldn't be MVP because he wasn't there to help his team. I asked you if Ortiz missed the time Hafner did would you vote for someone else. You didn;t respond to that either.

I'm sure in your response you will flame me or say I'm crying or whatever, but I want to make a special request you answer this question this time. I'll even put it in bold for you.

If David Ortiz missed 2 weeks due to injury like Travis Hafner did, would you then not select Ortiz as your MVP?

We already know you are a homer, but if the answer is no, you are a hypocrite.

**RoXer** · 09-25-2005, 12:35 AM

Come on D-Rays

**VonErich Lives** · 09-25-2005, 06:31 AM

Really Miz, I think I need to go back to calling you the wiz for awhile, cause you're really to pissy.

you flame me, and then accuse me of it... you make comments then when they're thrown back at you, you dance.

anyway, just so you'll shut up already (christ, you're worse then RP).

If Ortiz & Hafner swapped stats, I would give it to Hafner over Ortiz.

Anything else?

**OssMan** · 09-25-2005, 11:03 AM

lol mets are back at 500. GJ

**The Miz** · 09-25-2005, 02:25 PM

God Cano is like the shittiest 2B ever. He looks like he could turn out to be a good hitter but he is such a defensive liability it isnt worth it.

**Loose Cannon** · 09-25-2005, 07:02 PM

woah, missed a lot of talk in here this weekend.

Yea Cano is a shit 2nd baseman defensively, but the Yanks always seem to attract these guys for some reason. He's gonna be a great hitter though and if they work with him a lot at 2nd, he'll be fine. I just don't understand how you can play professional baseball and be a shit fielder.

Huge loss for the Indians today, Now only .5 ahead in the WC.

**YOUR Hero** · 09-25-2005, 08:45 PM

Fucking Cano won it for the Yanks today though. I don't mind the Yankees, I like Jeter, Matsui, Posada, Williams so it's hard to hate them. But this Cano dude, please.

09-21-2005, 10:33 PM	#1163
Loose Cannon I'm all there is Posts: 31,809	Chi Sox are fucked. They got to deal with the Twins, while The Tribe plays KC again. Only 2.5 games back if they hang on tonight. We may see a change there as well in a few days. Last edited by Loose Cannon; 09-21-2005 at 10:56 PM.

09-21-2005, 10:21 PM	#1161
Loose Cannon I'm all there is Posts: 31,809	Oh how things have changed. First. Place.

09-21-2005, 10:33 PM	#1164
McLegend Temporary Posts: 15,562	Ryan Howard is the man

09-21-2005, 10:57 PM	#1165
The Miz Clutch Poster Posts: 11,997	KC is playing better and Twins still have a AAA offense. I like the White Sox to win the division but by 1.5 or so

09-21-2005, 11:18 PM	#1166
Joey Slugs Second City Saint Posts: 5,806	god tonight sucked. what a difference a day makes.

09-22-2005, 12:36 AM	#1167
BCWWF The People's Member Posts: 18,092	Radke and Stewart are both done playing, but the White Sox aren't going to walk over the Twins, they have to face Santana, who always dominates, and they haven't been playing superb ball lately either...

09-22-2005, 12:38 AM	#1168
BCWWF The People's Member Posts: 18,092	Needless to say, I think the White Sox will still make the playoffs as well, because either the Yankees or Red Sox is going to lose that last series, and with a race this close it will be hard to make the playoffs while losing the final series.

09-22-2005, 04:59 AM	#1169
RP King of Love and Piss Posts: 62,988	My gut feeling says the Houston Astro's are gunna be the Champs this year. Mark it down.

09-22-2005, 02:06 PM	#1172
BCWWF The People's Member Posts: 18,092	http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/column...son&id=2168811 I like the first paragraph

09-23-2005, 12:14 AM	#1175
CNM Posts: 2,540	Hafner is obviously the man but I think you're understating how clutch Ortiz has been for the Red Sox. Yes, without him they'd still have Manny, Damon, etc. but none of those guys have been nearly as clutch. My vote would rest on who gets his team into the playoffs.

09-23-2005, 12:17 AM	#1176
CNM Posts: 2,540	Before people go off on me, I'd vote for A-Rod if the Yanks get into the playoffs before both Ortiz and Hafner.

09-23-2005, 12:29 AM	#1177
BCWWF The People's Member Posts: 18,092	A-Rod is probably still my guy too, but that was just an interesting article.

09-23-2005, 04:00 PM	#1178
The Outlaw Unofficial Legend Posts: 11,931	Yeah Hafner has been unbelievable. I was very surprised he wasn't listed in the MVP talks. If he would have been healthy all year, we might not be having this "debate".

09-23-2005, 10:37 PM	#1179
McLegend Temporary Posts: 15,562	Phillies down by 1 in the Wildcard

09-23-2005, 10:42 PM	#1182
VonErich Lives WTF do you want? Posts: 14,760	So, what happens in a multie tie? I've heard a few rumors but not an exact rule. Let's say the Sox and Yanks tie for the AL East The Indians and White Sox Tie for the AL Central. The 4 teams have the same records. I've heard 2 things. 1) The 2 divison teams play each other in a playoff to decide the Divison, and then losers then play each other for the Wild Card. 2) The divison is decided by head to head record and the two non-div winners play each other for the Wild Card. Anyone have more info?

09-24-2005, 02:22 AM	#1184
BCWWF The People's Member Posts: 18,092	You don't have to play the whole season to be considered. Shannon Stewart got votes when he was on the Twins for a half season because he singlehanded brought them back into the playoff race. The Red Sox aren't some magnificent powerhouse this season, just because Ortiz has good numbers doesn't automatically make him the MVP.

09-24-2005, 04:34 PM	#1189
RoXer History's Greatest, Mr. E Posts: 42,425	Ffffffuck da Rangers

09-24-2005, 05:19 PM	#1190
The Miz Clutch Poster Posts: 11,997	lol Buck is an asshole. He rolled over for the Angels and is managing this series like the playoffs because he is an A's hater.

09-24-2005, 07:42 PM	#1191
YOUR Hero Adminstigator Posts: 102,491	Miz, that's a shitty thing to say. The players wouldn't respect him and he'd get fired if that were the case. Players don't lie down and if they thought their manager was trying to make them loose they would be a revolt.

09-24-2005, 09:15 PM	#1192
The Miz Clutch Poster Posts: 11,997	I don't think they were trying to lose. I think they were giving an average effort against the Angels and are trying really hard to beat the A's.

09-25-2005, 12:35 AM	#1195
RoXer History's Greatest, Mr. E Posts: 42,425	Come on D-Rays

09-25-2005, 06:31 AM	#1196
VonErich Lives WTF do you want? Posts: 14,760	Really Miz, I think I need to go back to calling you the wiz for awhile, cause you're really to pissy. you flame me, and then accuse me of it... you make comments then when they're thrown back at you, you dance. anyway, just so you'll shut up already (christ, you're worse then RP). If Ortiz & Hafner swapped stats, I would give it to Hafner over Ortiz. Anything else?

09-25-2005, 11:03 AM	#1197
OssMan The Classic Dylan Staples Posts: 51,129	lol mets are back at 500. GJ

09-25-2005, 02:25 PM	#1198
The Miz Clutch Poster Posts: 11,997	God Cano is like the shittiest 2B ever. He looks like he could turn out to be a good hitter but he is such a defensive liability it isnt worth it.

09-25-2005, 07:02 PM	#1199
Loose Cannon I'm all there is Posts: 31,809	woah, missed a lot of talk in here this weekend. Yea Cano is a shit 2nd baseman defensively, but the Yanks always seem to attract these guys for some reason. He's gonna be a great hitter though and if they work with him a lot at 2nd, he'll be fine. I just don't understand how you can play professional baseball and be a shit fielder. Huge loss for the Indians today, Now only .5 ahead in the WC.

09-25-2005, 08:45 PM	#1200
YOUR Hero Adminstigator Posts: 102,491	Fucking Cano won it for the Yanks today though. I don't mind the Yankees, I like Jeter, Matsui, Posada, Williams so it's hard to hate them. But this Cano dude, please.