02-04-2022, 03:38 PM | #3321 |
In His hands...
Posts: 25,168
|
Historically speaking (I don't know this info), did WWF/E have any stars outgrowing the company 3 years in their infancy?
Legit asking - have ZERO idea of historical rasslin stuff |
02-04-2022, 04:21 PM | #3322 |
RoBOT Reigns
Posts: 9,619
|
Depends on how you define infancy. Vince bought WWF in the middle of 1982, and in January 1984 Hogan won the WWF title. The first Wrestlemania was in March 1985, so I would argue that yes Hogan had become a true star well within those 3 years.
|
02-04-2022, 04:26 PM | #3323 | |
Posts: 60,919
|
Quote:
Hulk Hogan was the WWF Champion within two years of Vince K. taking over in 1982. The first WrestleMania was in 1985. The whole “AEW is still young” thing doesn’t hold much water with me. I don’t think it takes that long to get over. Austin’s run at the top basically lasted as long as AEW has been around. Something in its fourth season isn’t considered “new” in television terms. But yes, I would say the WWF did have stars within 3 years of forming. But they also had television and a presence before that. |
|
02-04-2022, 04:33 PM | #3324 | |
RoBOT Reigns
Posts: 9,619
|
Quote:
|
|
02-04-2022, 04:42 PM | #3325 | ||
In His hands...
Posts: 25,168
|
Quote:
Quote:
Admittedly, I didn't read all that ^ - it shouldn't be this complex. AEW started a couple years ago. Whatever Vince McMahon or whoever started WWWWWWWWWF - where was it in the same amount of time as AEW's total time in existence. AEW - started in 2019 - its 2022 WWF (or whatever the OG company was) started in ???? its 2022. We can go down the "rabbit hole" of semantics with cable vs not cable blah blah blah, but that's not what I'm after. That wouldn't be a "fair comparison" to either party. Just wanna know, did WWF have any stars that were bigger than the brand in the same amount of man made time measurement of your choosing? |
||
02-04-2022, 04:56 PM | #3326 |
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,136
|
Nah dude. You can only do apples to apples comparisons like comparing the company that’s had 3 years to build an audience with the company that’s had 69/41 years (depending where you want to start) to build one.
|
02-04-2022, 06:08 PM | #3327 | |
Posts: 60,919
|
Quote:
The answer is yes. Whichever way you cut the cheese. The stars in the CWC and WWWF were bigger than today. If you want to start from Vince Jr, the answer is still yes. AEW doesn’t get to walk out with “they’re doing really well for 3 years!” They’re also capitalizing on years of history. They’ve got Jericho, JR, Sting, Danielson and Punk all signed. |
|
02-04-2022, 06:30 PM | #3328 |
Posts: 859
|
Big bang theory fans are getting pissed now about shitty AEW after their show. They will never hit a million again and either be cancelled or moved to a shitty timeslots in the next year.
|
02-04-2022, 06:30 PM | #3329 |
the heartbreak king
Posts: 48,431
|
post the next GGI match up
|
02-04-2022, 06:35 PM | #3330 |
quesque fuck?
Posts: 23,500
|
honestly
|
02-04-2022, 06:58 PM | #3331 | |
It's a blood match!
Posts: 27,374
|
Quote:
In particular I hate seeing the AEW logo next to the TBS logo. AEW was pretty much designed to work with TNT, so it really just sucks that they got the boot. Why didn't Dynamite just move to Tuesday night? Do they have hockey on Tuesdays? |
|
02-04-2022, 07:13 PM | #3332 |
Posts: 60,919
|
I can definitely see better uses for the slot. Would not be surprised to see AEW move at all.
|
02-04-2022, 07:17 PM | #3333 | |
RoBOT Reigns
Posts: 9,619
|
Quote:
But of course WWE had a ruthless businessman in charge and not a creepy 40 year old manchild nerd spending his daddy's money, so of course we should totally be more proud of Tony and all his hard work |
|
02-04-2022, 08:36 PM | #3334 |
Posts: 10,642
|
So what are you gonna say next time they hit 1m? Or will you be too busy eating your ham salad sandwiches
|
02-04-2022, 10:46 PM | #3335 | |
RoBOT Reigns
Posts: 9,619
|
Quote:
At some point that will no longer work, at which point he will start paying people with Nielsen Boxes to watch his shows. As long as Big Shad is signing those checks, Tony will spend whatever it takes to appear extra successful. |
|
02-04-2022, 10:47 PM | #3336 | |
Posts: 60,919
|
Quote:
|
|
02-04-2022, 10:49 PM | #3337 | |
Posts: 60,919
|
Quote:
|
|
02-05-2022, 05:12 AM | #3338 |
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,136
|
I don’t think it’s “people”, it’s specifically the backyard guy.
|
02-05-2022, 06:59 AM | #3339 |
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,136
|
What’s Hogan got to do with anything? Surely a more “apples to apples” comparison would be to claim that Disco Inferno is a bigger star than Michaels by virtue of the fact that he was exposed to a bigger audience. Nobody in 96 was tuning in to Nitro to watch Disco, as nobody today is tuning into see Theory. Which is literally the metric by which you determine who is a star.
|
02-05-2022, 03:27 PM | #3340 |
Posts: 859
|
Little baby XL crying that AEW can't hit 1 million viewers lmao
|
02-05-2022, 03:31 PM | #3341 |
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,136
|
Where?
|
02-05-2022, 04:19 PM | #3342 |
RoBOT Reigns
Posts: 9,619
|
|
02-05-2022, 04:19 PM | #3343 |
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,136
|
|
02-05-2022, 04:21 PM | #3344 |
the heartbreak king
Posts: 48,431
|
|
02-05-2022, 04:48 PM | #3345 | |
Posts: 60,919
|
Quote:
|
|
02-05-2022, 05:06 PM | #3346 |
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,136
|
Only he’s not a star according to the definition you gave; talent that people tune in to see.
He might be being groomed for Main Events, and for my money he’s a good horse to back, but people are not tuning in to see him. Does he “spike a rating”? He might, I don’t know, the numbers are not the be-all and end-all to me in the same way they are for some. He’s a good talent, a great prospect, he may even be better right now than AEW’s very best, but he’s not pulling the “1.8”m people in. AEW have positioned Page as their champion. He’s not pulling in “1.8”m, but it’s reasonable to assume that a higher proportion of AEW’s audience of “900”k are tuning in to see Page. I’ll remind you that you made the comparison between Page and Theory, before then pivoting to compare guys in the same position. As things stand I’d personally much rather say there are barely any/almost no stars in wrestling today. |
02-05-2022, 06:47 PM | #3347 | |
Posts: 60,919
|
Quote:
Theory is a bigger star than Adam Page. I’m not pivoting on anything. AEW doesn’t have the reach. |
|
02-05-2022, 10:35 PM | #3348 |
RoBOT Reigns
Posts: 9,619
|
Punk can draw a certain type of people nobody else can, and that is the small subsection of MMA fans who enjoy watching colossal failures go on different shows and still pretend they can win a fight against anyone. Punk is the king in that demo.
|
02-05-2022, 11:10 PM | #3349 |
Posts: 60,919
|
Punk’s always been able to generate hype for one event. Outside of Money in the Bank 2011, did he ever actually draw money before getting his ass handed to him in the UFC and getting ghost cum on his face in shitty horror films?
|
02-06-2022, 04:32 AM | #3350 | |
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,136
|
Quote:
Now you’ve introduced the notion of “fame” to the conversation. I’m not going to argue your “mathematics” because that would be stupid, I’d just be cautious of extrapolating too much from the numbers. You’ve also changed the benchmark of what we were originally discussing. Or at least what I thought we were discussing given the actual words you used. |
|
02-06-2022, 02:34 PM | #3351 | |
Posts: 60,919
|
Quote:
|
|
02-06-2022, 02:40 PM | #3352 |
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,136
|
|
02-07-2022, 08:46 AM | #3353 |
In His hands...
Posts: 25,168
|
The WWE universe are the biggest stars. They are featured every single minute of every Raw.
AND WITHOUT A CONTRACT, SAXON! |
02-07-2022, 09:01 AM | #3354 |
In His hands...
Posts: 25,168
|
Course we have a resident star here in Shisen KOTF - getting his sign on national TV.
|
02-07-2022, 10:06 AM | #3355 |
Shelly Martinez = Ratings
Posts: 23,508
|
I wish there was a way to have a thread showing everyone who got a TPWW sign on TV. I'm sure Shisen would know what to call it.
|
02-07-2022, 10:18 AM | #3356 |
It's a blood match!
Posts: 27,374
|
Man the NBA and College Basketball plus all the excitement and self preservation for The Pro Bowl and Superbowl coming up put a lot of guys off AEW Friday night.
517,000 viewers and a .19 in the 18 to 49 demographic for Rampage. It really sucks that AEW has to compete with the biggest names in sports like NBA and NFL, directly which pulls lots of viewership. But without that big sports competition, people going out to party or breaking news days Rampage probably would EASILY break 850k each week and if it wasn't basketball season Dynamite would EASILY break major records. |
02-07-2022, 03:21 PM | #3357 | |
Posts: 60,919
|
Quote:
|
|
02-07-2022, 09:44 PM | #3358 |
RoBOT Reigns
Posts: 9,619
|
Can you imagine if there was a brand new sitcom with an ensemble cast like Friends in 2022 that came out and got 500,000 viewers?
Now can you imagine the actors on the show CONSTANTLY talking about how great their ratings are and getting into Twitter fights with random people calling them cunts/twats/small white dick energy ect.? Something tells me that wouldn't fly. |
02-08-2022, 03:11 AM | #3359 |
Posts: 60,919
|
AEW’s ratings are pitiful and they act like fucking twats about them. No one in television acts that way, because that’s not the way ratings work.
|
02-08-2022, 06:24 AM | #3360 | |
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,136
|
Quote:
Your analogy to Friends isn’t quite 1:1 as Friends isn’t still running new programming. Comparisons to movies don’t quite work either. Or to shows like Game of Thrones. The best I came up with was long running soap operas as they run for years with multiple new episodes a week and no break. In the UK there are 2 huge long-running soap operas on opposing channels; BBC1 has Eastenders which has run since 1985, and ITV has Coronation Street which has run since 1960. They have both pulled huge ratings in the past; 5/10 of the most watched shows (non-sports, non-news) of all time in the UK are episodes of the 2 shows (4 Eastenders, 1 Coronation Street) with an episode of Eastenders the most watched show of all time with 30 million aggregate viewers (only 2m viewers less than the 1966 World Cup final - that’s the one hosted and won by England, and the coverage of Princess Diana’s funeral). These shows were ratings juggernauts, but have seen significant declines over the years. Eastenders average rating in 1987 was over 21m, in 2020 it was around 5.5m and last year it registered its lowest ever overnight rating. Struggling to find year-by-year average ratings for Coronation Street but their highest rated episode of the year has steadily declined from a high of 27m in 1989 to 7.1m in 2021. Over the years other soap operas have been launched, most notably, Brookside (Channel 4, 1982-2003) which regularly drew an audience of 8m+, Emmerdale (ITV, 1989-present) with it’s highest ever rating of 12.5m, and Hollyoaks (Channel 4, 1998-present), viewing figures harder to come by but current figures have them at around 500,000 viewers per episode. These “upstart” soaps have struggled to “muscle in” on the kind of viewing figures achieved by Eastenders and Coronation Street. So I guess, Coronation Street is WWE, Eastenders is WCW, Brookside is ECW, Emmerdale is AEW, and Hollyoaks is Impact. If you think the wrestling twittersphere is polarised, you should see it when the UK soap fans get heated. |
|