01-22-2019, 12:00 AM | #161 |
Loque Ja
Posts: 87,868
|
Damn.... never knew that @ Golden/Sugar Crisp
|
01-22-2019, 12:03 AM | #162 |
Quark is Less Impressed.
Posts: 38,371
|
Sasha's bear ass tonight
|
01-22-2019, 12:03 AM | #163 |
Loque Ja
Posts: 87,868
|
At the 1904 World Fair, the Quaker Oats Company made a candy-coated puffed cereal, a wheat-based product similar to Cracker Jack's candy-coated popcorn. The product concept was re-introduced unsuccessfully in 1939 by another business as Ranger Joe, the first pre-sweetened, candy-coated breakfast cereal. Post Foods introduced their own version in 1948. The Post version was originally called Happy Jax, and was renamed to Sugar Crisp the next year.[2] In 1967, The name was later changed to Super Sugar Crisp, and in 1985, it was changed again to Super Golden Crisp.[3] Finally, it was changed to Golden Crisp (during a time when many cereals dropped the word "Sugar" from their titles) in the American market.
The product is still sold as Sugar Crisp in Canada. In Canada, the box still displays the Sugar Bear mascot and the phrase "Can't get enough of that Sugar Crisp." |
01-22-2019, 12:05 AM | #164 |
Loque Ja
Posts: 87,868
|
My world is rocked right now....
And I never even particularly liked Sugar Crisp.... |
01-22-2019, 12:36 AM | #165 | ||
I W C DEEZ NUTZ!
Posts: 10,137
|
Quote:
Quote:
Two, Have *him* team with Jason Jordan, who reprises is Southpaw persona of Porkchop Jones. |
||
01-22-2019, 12:40 AM | #166 | |
I W C DEEZ NUTZ!
Posts: 10,137
|
Quote:
|
|
01-22-2019, 01:51 AM | #167 |
Posts: 58,590
|
|
01-22-2019, 02:51 AM | #168 |
Trickster Demon
Posts: 59,750
|
A Banks Statement
|
01-22-2019, 04:25 AM | #169 |
Hey Mister!
Posts: 54,947
|
lol
|
01-22-2019, 04:46 AM | #170 |
Feeling Oof-y
Posts: 17,136
|
- Do they really need to use that pic of Finn?
- Pleased to see a Ryder/Hawkins reunion. - How long before Lacey Evans loses her surname? |
01-22-2019, 06:04 AM | #171 |
Posts: 58,590
|
I feel so disconnected with NXT as of late. I am not well informed with the current crop at all.
|
01-22-2019, 11:13 AM | #172 |
Tongue my Fartbox
Posts: 5,362
|
Interesting that a suplex outside the ring isn't a DQ but in the ring an f5 that looked more like an AA somehow is.
|
01-22-2019, 12:51 PM | #175 |
Posts: 419
|
Nice bootay!
|
01-22-2019, 01:06 PM | #176 |
Quark is Less Impressed.
Posts: 38,371
|
|
01-22-2019, 01:20 PM | #177 |
Tongue my Fartbox
Posts: 5,362
|
|
01-22-2019, 03:35 PM | #178 |
Hey Mister!
Posts: 54,947
|
Yeah, and it typically leads to a DQ if the ref sees it.
|
01-22-2019, 03:36 PM | #179 |
Hey Mister!
Posts: 54,947
|
I didn’t actually watch. Did the ref see it?
|
01-22-2019, 03:50 PM | #180 |
Tongue my Fartbox
Posts: 5,362
|
Id guess so, Finn got thrown from the ring down into Brocks arms and he suplexed him over his head. Then again the ref may had been looking at that image of sasha's butt on his phone. If so i can excuse him.
ED: Yes, he seen it. I suppose we'll chalk this one upto "wwe pick and choose what rules apply" logic. And my god that was one shitty f5. |
01-22-2019, 05:11 PM | #181 |
Hey Mister!
Posts: 54,947
|
Dunno there have been times where the ref had to work very hard to make it look like he doesn’t see what’s happening, but I can’t think of an instance where there was blatant interference right in front of the ref and it didn’t end right there in a dq.
|
01-22-2019, 06:12 PM | #182 |
I'm Something Else
Posts: 1,684
|
|
01-22-2019, 07:00 PM | #183 |
Tongue my Fartbox
Posts: 5,362
|
Just wwe ignoring their "rules".
|