PDA

View Full Version : Benoit: Lying sack of *%@!


Favre4Ever
06-09-2004, 07:16 PM
Fully Loaded 2000 - The Rock vs. Chris Benoit! for the WWF Title.

Highly entertaining match. Lots of hot moves. Benoit has stepped up his game since arriving with the Radicals. But wait, whats this?

JR: Bah Gad Benoit just clocked the Rock with a Steel Chair!

King: He pinned him!!! Benoits the Champ!!!!!

***Foleys music hits***

JR: Foleys forcing this match continue! I don't believe it!!!

King: Rock Bottom! It over!!!!

Benoit held the title for less than 60 seconds that night. But wait! - theres more:

Unforgiven 2000- The Rock vs. Kane vs. Taker vs. Benoit Fatal 4-way

(From what I remember, this was one great month for WWF T-V)

The match was great, Kane had new attire and was fitting well with his monster gimmick. But wait, whats this?

JR: BAH GAWD CHAIR SHOT TO THE ROCK!

King: He pinned him! Hes the Champ!!!
***Foleys music hits***

Needless to say, Benoit has held the Title twice already. So whats all of this fuss about him winning his first Heavyweigt Championship? Unbelievable! :naughty:

The One
06-09-2004, 07:20 PM
and the point of this was.......... to remind us that WWE has teased Benoit with title runs before? :shifty:

Joyrider
06-09-2004, 07:21 PM
they were scratched off the record

Shaggy
06-09-2004, 07:36 PM
Just like when he won the title in WCW. The last show he appeared on in WCW he won the title against Sid Vicious with Arn Anderson as the ref. Then the next night he was on Raw and on Nitro they had Arn Anderson come out and say that either Beniot or Sids foot was under the rope at the time so it did not count. That is just another thing that they did to scratch him off a title run.

Aussie Skier
06-09-2004, 07:42 PM
Just like when he won the title in WCW. The last show he appeared on in WCW he won the title against Sid Vicious with Arn Anderson as the ref. Then the next night he was on Raw and on Nitro they had Arn Anderson come out and say that either Beniot or Sids foot was under the rope at the time so it did not count. That is just another thing that they did to scratch him off a title run.

I dont think your totally right about that.
In the records, im fairly sure it does state that Benoit did win the title then, but then vacated it

tucsonspeed6
06-09-2004, 07:49 PM
When the match is continued like that, it usually means that the pinfall was negated and that the match will, obviously, continue. If Foley came out and said, "You cheated in your match. But we'll have ANOTHER match right now!" then the results of the first match would be final and Benoit would be the champion for less than 60 seconds. Are you understanding now? Benoit wasn't the champ because his pinfall didn't count.....or are you basing this on the fact that King said he was champ. Here's a clue: JR has called matches in which he said that "lightning" hit the ringpost, when the live audience only saw a pyro go off. No lightning. Does that mean that the lightning was really there? No. King was wrong. He's always wrong, except when he's talking about tits.

The One
06-09-2004, 08:05 PM
And to clarify....Benoit was announced as Champion of WCW on January 16, 2000...however on January 17, 2000 WCW declared the title vacant, AND claimed the victory was null and void. There for for 24 hours Benoit was Champ, but it is like winning Miss America and then they find out you were in porn (...not that that ever happened) and they not only strip you of your title, but declare that it never happened. They don't deny Benoit WON the title in the match, nor did they strip the match from the record books, just declared that an erronious winner was named...and therefore denied Benoit's title reign.

Favre4Ever
06-09-2004, 08:30 PM
I promise you guys i'm not stupid enough to believe everything that King and J.R. say. If fact, I hardly believe any of it. In my beginning post, i was kind of being funny, but also hinting that Benoit in a way has alrady tasted the gold, so his wrestlemania win didn't really mean as much as it seemed.

Mayo
06-09-2004, 08:38 PM
King was wrong. He's always wrong, except when he's talking about tits.

:lol:

Corkscrewed
06-09-2004, 08:51 PM
Yeah... too bad you failed hulk. ;) :p

.44 Magdalene
06-09-2004, 09:15 PM
Hulkamania = Assface.

Favre4Ever
06-10-2004, 12:50 AM
i knew i made a mistake when I posted that

Sensei Of Mattitude
06-10-2004, 01:08 AM
EXCUSE ME

Being that I was at Unforgiven 2000 (at the First Union Center), Benoit chair-shooted The Undertaker and made a cover while Taker's foot was on the bottom rope and the referee made the 3-count. Foley comes out, match restarted.... Rock wins and retains the Gold.

Lara Emily
06-10-2004, 01:12 AM
And to clarify....Benoit was announced as Champion of WCW on January 16, 2000...however on January 17, 2000 WCW declared the title vacant, AND claimed the victory was null and void. There for for 24 hours Benoit was Champ, but it is like winning Miss America and then they find out you were in porn (...not that that ever happened) and they not only strip you of your title, but declare that it never happened. They don't deny Benoit WON the title in the match, nor did they strip the match from the record books, just declared that an erronious winner was named...and therefore denied Benoit's title reign.
Didn't they deny it for a while and eventually (like I think when the WWF bought WCW put it back on the record books?)

Rock Bottom
06-10-2004, 02:06 AM
If Foley had been there every time The Rock got cheated out of a match, or cheated to win, his record would probably be the same.

Sensei Of Mattitude
06-10-2004, 12:09 PM
WCW was gay like that.

The One
06-10-2004, 03:34 PM
Didn't they deny it for a while and eventually (like I think when the WWF bought WCW put it back on the record books?)

No...WCW never denied the match took place, they just denied that Benoit ever won the title...The match wasn't taken off the record book, just the winning...kind of like going back and declaring a no contest after the match ended...

Imagine this...(I am going to use American Football as an example) The Cowboys and the 49ers are in the SUperBowl...the score is tied and there is 1 second left on the clock. The Cowboys hike the ball and the Quarterback throws it to the wide receiver. The wide receiver catches it and is takled in the end zone....the Cowboys win the Superbowl...but wait. After everyone has gone home the referees see that he was actually takled on the 1 yard line. The Cowboys never scored the touchdown. Now the NFL announces that since the Cowboys never scored the touchdown they didn't technially win...So there is no winner of the SuperBowl...They don't deny that the Cowboys were named the winners, or that the game took place, they just announce that there was no winner...and since the Cowboys all moved to the XFL (far fetched I know) they can't re do the game or even allow it to go into over time. Hence there is no winner of the SuperBowl....

Does that make any sense? (oh yeah, and sorry if I butchered any Football logic...I don't watch the sport, I was just trying to make an annalogy.)

Lara Emily
06-10-2004, 03:36 PM
No...WCW never denied the match took place, they just denied that Benoit ever won the title...The match wasn't taken off the record book, just the winning...kind of like going back and declaring a no contest after the match ended...

Imagine this...(I am going to use American Football as an example) The Cowboys and the 49ers are in the SUperBowl...the score is tied and there is 1 second left on the clock. The Cowboys hike the ball and the Quarterback throws it to the wide receiver. The wide receiver catches it and is takled in the end zone....the Cowboys win the Superbowl...but wait. After everyone has gone home the referees see that he was actually takled on the 1 yard line. The Cowboys never scored the touchdown. Now the NFL announces that since the Cowboys never scored the touchdown they didn't technially win...So there is no winner of the SuperBowl...They don't deny that the Cowboys were named the winners, or that the game took place, they just announce that there was no winner...and since the Cowboys all moved to the XFL (far fetched I know) they can't re do the game or even allow it to go into over time. Hence there is no winner of the SuperBowl....

Does that make any sense? (oh yeah, and sorry if I butchered any Football logic...I don't watch the sport, I was just trying to make an annalogy.)
No I meant that I'm pretty sure that they know recognize Benoit as a one time WCW champion.

Kane Knight
06-10-2004, 03:56 PM
You're really trying to unseat Aussie Skiier for forum retard, aren't you?

The One
06-10-2004, 04:28 PM
You're really trying to unseat Aussie Skiier for forum retard, aren't you?

Who was that directed towards?

Corkscrewed
06-10-2004, 04:55 PM
hulk?

Kane Knight
06-10-2004, 04:57 PM
Who was that directed towards?
What, worried someone's calling you a retard? Maybe your conscience is trying to tell you something. :p

Sensei Of Mattitude
06-10-2004, 05:51 PM
No...WCW never denied the match took place, they just denied that Benoit ever won the title...The match wasn't taken off the record book, just the winning...kind of like going back and declaring a no contest after the match ended...

Imagine this...(I am going to use American Football as an example) The Cowboys and the 49ers are in the SUperBowl...the score is tied and there is 1 second left on the clock. The Cowboys hike the ball and the Quarterback throws it to the wide receiver. The wide receiver catches it and is takled in the end zone....the Cowboys win the Superbowl...but wait. After everyone has gone home the referees see that he was actually takled on the 1 yard line. The Cowboys never scored the touchdown. Now the NFL announces that since the Cowboys never scored the touchdown they didn't technially win...So there is no winner of the SuperBowl...They don't deny that the Cowboys were named the winners, or that the game took place, they just announce that there was no winner...and since the Cowboys all moved to the XFL (far fetched I know) they can't re do the game or even allow it to go into over time. Hence there is no winner of the SuperBowl....

Does that make any sense? (oh yeah, and sorry if I butchered any Football logic...I don't watch the sport, I was just trying to make an annalogy.)

Doesnt make sense BECAUSE the 49ers and Cowgirls cant play each other in the Superbowl

The One
06-10-2004, 05:55 PM
Doesnt make sense BECAUSE the 49ers and Cowgirls cant play each other in the Superbowl

Again...sorry if it didn't make perfect sense...I have watched 2 football games in my life...just trying to make a point.