which of these

[Bad Guy]

should never have gotten considered for a sequel

Under Siege 3 (2005)

Basic Instinct 2: Risk Addiction (2005)

Die Hard 4.0 (2006)

[DaveWadding]

Bambi II (2006). That's my vote.

[El Vaquero de Infierno]

None of them should have been considered for a sequel... period!

They should of left Die Hard at number 2. The third one sucks, so the new one will be suckier.

[Innovator]

Basic Instinct, cmon

[The Miz]

Land Before Time 13

[Boondock Saint]

None of them should have been considered for a sequel... period!

They should of left Die Hard at number 2. The third one sucks, so the new one will be suckier.

What? 3 is almost as good as 1. 2 is the suckiest of the bunch.

[Funky Fly]

I dunno about Die Hard, because I love that series, but the first 2 are definite nonos.

[Shaggy]

Die Hard gets a pass because its my favorite movie of all time and I will respect all the sequels to it no matter how crappy they get.

I will let Under Seige have a pass because I like the first one alot and they might be able to do something better with it now.

But Basic Instinct 2 should definently not happen. My vote goes toward it.

[#1-norm-fan]

Yeah, Die Hard 3 was great. As good as the first, maybe even better.