![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
TPWW VET
Posts: 10,837
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
which of these
should never have gotten considered for a sequel
Under Siege 3 (2005) Basic Instinct 2: Risk Addiction (2005) Die Hard 4.0 (2006) |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
LIMITLESS
Posts: 32,276
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Bambi II (2006). That's my vote.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Sisukas Mies
Posts: 15,655
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
None of them should have been considered for a sequel... period!
They should of left Die Hard at number 2. The third one sucks, so the new one will be suckier. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Inno Knows.
Posts: 43,710
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Basic Instinct, cmon
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Clutch Poster
Posts: 11,997
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Land Before Time 13
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Posts: 8,795
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
The Satanic Mechanic
Posts: 52,521
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I dunno about Die Hard, because I love that series, but the first 2 are definite nonos.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Yipee Kai Yay!!!
Posts: 5,705
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Die Hard gets a pass because its my favorite movie of all time and I will respect all the sequels to it no matter how crappy they get.
I will let Under Seige have a pass because I like the first one alot and they might be able to do something better with it now. But Basic Instinct 2 should definently not happen. My vote goes toward it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Resident drug enabler
Posts: 45,473
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Yeah, Die Hard 3 was great. As good as the first, maybe even better.
|
|
|
|