TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   entertainment forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   which of these (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=25501)

Bad Guy 01-17-2005 01:51 PM

which of these
 
should never have gotten considered for a sequel

Under Siege 3 (2005)

Basic Instinct 2: Risk Addiction (2005)

Die Hard 4.0 (2006)

DaveWadding 01-17-2005 02:25 PM

Bambi II (2006). That's my vote.

El Vaquero de Infierno 01-17-2005 03:42 PM

None of them should have been considered for a sequel... period!

They should of left Die Hard at number 2. The third one sucks, so the new one will be suckier.

Innovator 01-17-2005 03:55 PM

Basic Instinct, cmon

The Miz 01-17-2005 05:10 PM

Land Before Time 13

Boondock Saint 01-17-2005 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by El Vaquero de Infierno
None of them should have been considered for a sequel... period!

They should of left Die Hard at number 2. The third one sucks, so the new one will be suckier.

What? 3 is almost as good as 1. 2 is the suckiest of the bunch.

Funky Fly 01-17-2005 07:06 PM

I dunno about Die Hard, because I love that series, but the first 2 are definite nonos.

Shaggy 01-18-2005 01:00 AM

Die Hard gets a pass because its my favorite movie of all time and I will respect all the sequels to it no matter how crappy they get.

I will let Under Seige have a pass because I like the first one alot and they might be able to do something better with it now.

But Basic Instinct 2 should definently not happen. My vote goes toward it.

#1-norm-fan 01-18-2005 02:37 AM

Yeah, Die Hard 3 was great. As good as the first, maybe even better.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®