#1 or #2

[Shaggy]

Ive been doing some thinking and to any of yall do you think theres a big difference entering #1 in the Rumble then entering #2. Its not like one had to work harder in it. I guess its just everyone wanting to be #1.

[The Ravishing One]

i guess its just the fact that you can say that you were the first in!

[The Ravishing One]

just an ego thing

[Kane Knight]

It's got huge psychological value. That's about it. It can be mentally daunting, and saying you were the first in and last out is a huge bragging right.

[Eunos]

Saying you won after entering at no 1 sounds a tad bit more impressive then entering at No 2.

[Kane Knight]

Saying you won after entering at no 1 sounds a tad bit more impressive then entering at No 2.

Besides, eing #2 has some rather...shitty...Connotations...

[M-A-G]

I think last year's Rumble showed that being number 1 puts you at a sort of disadvantage.

[Corkscrewed]

Like everyone's said, it's connotation. Winning at #1 sounds more impressive than winning at #2, even though it IS the exact same thing.