![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Yipee Kai Yay!!!
Posts: 5,705
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
#1 or #2
Ive been doing some thinking and to any of yall do you think theres a big difference entering #1 in the Rumble then entering #2. Its not like one had to work harder in it. I guess its just everyone wanting to be #1.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Hello
Posts: 7,696
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
i guess its just the fact that you can say that you were the first in!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Hello
Posts: 7,696
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
just an ego thing
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's got huge psychological value. That's about it. It can be mentally daunting, and saying you were the first in and last out is a huge bragging right.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Bastard Deer
Posts: 1,385
![]() ![]() |
Saying you won after entering at no 1 sounds a tad bit more impressive then entering at No 2.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Higher. Further. Faster.
Posts: 21,074
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think last year's Rumble showed that being number 1 puts you at a sort of disadvantage.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Posts: 18,357
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Like everyone's said, it's connotation. Winning at #1 sounds more impressive than winning at #2, even though it IS the exact same thing.
|
![]() |
![]() |