#1 or #2
 

Ive been doing some thinking and to any of yall do you think theres a big difference entering #1 in the Rumble then entering #2. Its not like one had to work harder in it. I guess its just everyone wanting to be #1.

i guess its just the fact that you can say that you were the first in!

just an ego thing

It's got huge psychological value. That's about it. It can be mentally daunting, and saying you were the first in and last out is a huge bragging right.

Saying you won after entering at no 1 sounds a tad bit more impressive then entering at No 2.

Besides, eing #2 has some rather...shitty...Connotations...

I think last year's Rumble showed that being number 1 puts you at a sort of disadvantage.

Like everyone's said, it's connotation. Winning at #1 sounds more impressive than winning at #2, even though it IS the exact same thing.