When is the last time the WHC was traded cleanly?

[BigDaddyCool]

Well? CM Punk beating Edge wasn't clean.

[Gertner]

Taker over Edge I'm guessing

[BigDaddyCool]

Hmmm, but before that, it hasn't been clean in a while has it?

[Gertner]

I'm pretty sure you'd have to go back to Batista over the Great Khali

[BigDaddyCool]

I'm pretty sure you'd have to go back to Batista over the Great Khali

I don't really count that as clean because Batista was inserted into the match in the very last minute.

[Gertner]

hmmmmm, this could be tough then

[Jeritron]

what the fuck are you on about? You got 2 answers. If those don't count for whatever reason, then Taker at WM23. But the correct answer is Taker at 24, and Batista before that.

[Gertner]

yikes

[Jeritron]

Has more to do with the fact that most of the reigns have been of decent length than anything. Plus Edge has been the champ every other time, and his whole character is a scheming heel.

[Gertner]

for the most part, any time a face wins the belt it's clean, opposite for heel.

[Jeritron]

and anytime the Undertaker lose it's far far from clean, unless it's Steve Austin he's facing

[BigDaddyCool]

Better question, when was the last time the WHC looked good?

[TerranRich]

When it was the WCW belt, and even then...

[Indifferent Clox]

Heels have won clean and faces have won whilst using unclean tactics before. But the majority of the time what Gertner said is true. Unless it's ROH.

[Juan]

Better question, when was the last time the WHC looked good?

Last night.

[BigDaddyCool]

I disagree. I'm not saying Jericho discredits the title. The booking does.

[Juan]

Good point.

[Fox]

The last time it looked good was WrestleMania 20.

[Jeritron]

Wrestlemania 24

[NeanderCarl]

The last time it looked good was WrestleMania 20.

Yeah, right. The last time it looked good was the night it was vacated.

:roll: