Lock Jaw
06-30-2009, 05:24 PM
The whole contractual rematch clause deal?
I know it has been around forever, but it seems to me like they like throwing about the term more and more over the past few years.
It just seems... I dunno... lazy to me. Like the writers want to book a rematch and rather than making it so that the person in question has a legitimate claim to a rematch, they just use this rematch clause thing.
Now if someone came out and challenged the new champ to a rematch, not mentioning the whole clause deal, I wouldn't mind it so much.
Worst is when the rematch is like the next week or something. Cheapens title bouts. They should at least build to it with at least like a week buffer or something.
I don't know. It just makes me angry every time someone throws about the term.
I know it has been around forever, but it seems to me like they like throwing about the term more and more over the past few years.
It just seems... I dunno... lazy to me. Like the writers want to book a rematch and rather than making it so that the person in question has a legitimate claim to a rematch, they just use this rematch clause thing.
Now if someone came out and challenged the new champ to a rematch, not mentioning the whole clause deal, I wouldn't mind it so much.
Worst is when the rematch is like the next week or something. Cheapens title bouts. They should at least build to it with at least like a week buffer or something.
I don't know. It just makes me angry every time someone throws about the term.