Am I the only one who hates...

**Lock Jaw** · 06-30-2009, 05:24 PM

The whole contractual rematch clause deal?

I know it has been around forever, but it seems to me like they like throwing about the term more and more over the past few years.

It just seems... I dunno... lazy to me. Like the writers want to book a rematch and rather than making it so that the person in question has a legitimate claim to a rematch, they just use this rematch clause thing.

Now if someone came out and challenged the new champ to a rematch, not mentioning the whole clause deal, I wouldn't mind it so much.

Worst is when the rematch is like the next week or something. Cheapens title bouts. They should at least build to it with at least like a week buffer or something.

I don't know. It just makes me angry every time someone throws about the term.

06-30-2009, 05:24 PM	#1
Lock Jaw Skibbidy Lock Jaw Posts: 88,588	Am I the only one who hates... The whole contractual rematch clause deal? I know it has been around forever, but it seems to me like they like throwing about the term more and more over the past few years. It just seems... I dunno... lazy to me. Like the writers want to book a rematch and rather than making it so that the person in question has a legitimate claim to a rematch, they just use this rematch clause thing. Now if someone came out and challenged the new champ to a rematch, not mentioning the whole clause deal, I wouldn't mind it so much. Worst is when the rematch is like the next week or something. Cheapens title bouts. They should at least build to it with at least like a week buffer or something. I don't know. It just makes me angry every time someone throws about the term.