I probably shouldn't have actually VOTED Bret now that I think about it.

Who voted Shawn though!?

RemyRedAssassin

...I am one of the 7 to vote Bret... :shifty:

I voted Vince.

Er, no you didn't. This is a public poll so we can see who everyone voted. You voted Shawn. Ass.

Bret and Shawn Michaels were PAID EMPLOYEES of the World Wrestling Federation. If Vince told Bret he was going to dress up like a clown and ride around on Shawn Michaels back for an hour, he should have done it without hesitation.

It was VINCES COMPANY. Vince was losing to WCW, and everything could have been ruined if Bret Hart didnt do the job he was asked( should have been TOLD) to do. Shawn Michaels was another paid employee. He was asked to carry on the storyline, and he did it. Bret Hart let his ego go to his head by not doing what his boss required of him, and Vince took matters into his own hands. His company, his belts, his employees, his decision. About EVERYTHING.

Now the reason I think this is Vinces fault is because he trusted a man like Bret Hart with the World Wrestling Federation Championship. He should have chosen someone who he KNEW he could trust to follow his orders. Instead, he put blind trust in Bret Hart, and when Vince asked Hart to drop the title to Michaels, HART screwed VINCE.

lol, what? Are you serious? Bret was the most loyal wrestling employee the WWF had. He missed one show in 15 years, he NEVER NEVER NEVER refused to do any jobs expect that once. Bret could of went to WCW in 96 for more money, but chose to stay loyal to the company who made him. Now to say Bret couldn't be trusted is just plain ridiculous.

Do you think Mr. "I won't do any jobs" Michaels was someone who could be trusted. Do you know how many times Shawn refused to drop titles because he didn't want to job?

Bret Hart should have done the job, yes. But, Vince gave him Creative Control, NOT BRET'S FAULT. Vince agreed to a double DQ finish and then doublecrossed Hart. That's real loyal right? Bret Hart was willing to job the title the next night on Raw. He felt they were trying to sabatoge him by asking him to do the job in Montreal on PPV. And really, who can blame him.

McMahon's company or not, he should of never doublecrossed Bret like that. That's very unprofessional. And if I were Bret, I wouldn't want to drop the title to an arrogant punk ass with no respect like HBK eathier

Well, I didn't really get into wrestling at that time, more so just afterwards, so I don't know all of the details. But I voted Bret because he's leaving to go to the rival company, while hes at the top of his current company. But to think he doesn't have to do a job on his last day in the company is ludacris. But I still agree with the majority to say that everyone is at fault in their own way.

If you don't have all the detail's, how can you give an accurate vote? Read up on it and you will clearly see that Vince is 100% at fault. Bret had creative control, that mean's he has a say in how he loses (vince put that in the contract), and besided he didn't refuse to job, he refused to job to Shawn, he openly said he would have lost to anybody else. And on top of that, Survivor Series was his second to last day, he said he would drop the title the next night on Raw in a four-way match, with if i recall, Bret, Shawn, Shamrock and The Undertaker. In this match he would have lost and Shawn would have ended up with the title. Now is that too much to ask after 15 year's of LOYAL SERVICES? I don't think so.

Ok, I have to vote Bret on this one. The fact that the incident happened is Vince McMahon's fault for sure. But the fact that it happened the way it happened is down to Bret's behavior, for the simple reason that Bret was the only one who could have stopped what happened. Bret had been in the company fifteen years; he knew what kind of game Vince played, he knew what kind of game Shawn played. Why he assumed that they would follow through on what they promised will forever escape me. And it's not like he didn't have suspicions, or else why would he have asked Hebner to swear to him that nothing was going to go wrong? Bret had a chance to immortalize himself beyond a shadow of a doubt that night. He could have given the performance of his life, lost the title in a fighting blaze of glory, and then stood alone in the ring afterwards to pay tribute to the fans. The story would have gotten out all the same, that Bret was forced against his will to drop the title to Michaels, and that though it went against every fiber of his being to do, in the end he swallowed his pride and made that sacrifice. Bret would have been hailed as a saint, and the scales of blame would be undeniably tipped towards Shawn and Vince (and Earl.) The way he's handled it since then has served to drive it into the heads of a lot of fans that Bret is a bitter crybaby. In the end, two wrongs don't make a right, and although Bret has every right to be angry and bitter over how things happened, I'll never get past the idea that Bret could have made that night a glorious moment for himself, but chose to make it the blight on the wrestling world that it is.

:love: ColdwaVer

Excellant point's. I agree that Bret could have done different, but i still feel that the proposed finished would have worked also. Where there was a double DQ ending and Bret would drop the title the next night in a four way match. Vince's fear that Bret would have brought the title to Nitro is absurd, i think most people can agree that Bret would have never have done that.

...

Exactly. Bret grew up in the business, he would never spit on it like that. Stu would practically disown him if he had pulled such a stunt.
No way in hell Bret ever does that to a company he considered home and like family. He truly was appreciative of all that company gave him and his family.
That's not how Bret operates, he's a pure pro.

I heard what pissed bret off was shawn said "I'd never put you over" or something like that.

Bret might not have done it, however it's not totally a matter of what Bret would have done. Bischoff could very well have hailed Bret as the never-beaten WWF champion come to WCW. He could have appeared even with a replica WWF belt and trashed it a la Madusa without Bret ever being part of it. No, I don't think Bret would have had a pisstake all over the title on TV, yes, I agree that he had/has too much respect for the business than that, but I also think that Bischoff would have personally and literally crapped on the belt if he thought it would have meant ratings.

Bottom line, Bret might not have taken the belt to WCW, but Bischoff would certainly have brought the WWF champion into WCW.

Vince...bottom line.

LC has already said all that needs to be said. Those voting Bret, and to a lesser extent Shawn have to be teetering on the edge of delusion. Bret isn't my favorite wrestler, but I do believe he does kick ass. Ditto for HBK...I put the blame on Vince because everything was signed, sealed, and delivered, then he (and some others) reneged without informing Bret. That's definition of a screwjob if you ask me.