TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   wrestling forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   DISCUSSION - Triple H haters: How do you explain Cena and Batista being put overly cleanly? (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=126007)

Heyman 02-16-2014 12:00 AM

DISCUSSION - Triple H haters: How do you explain Cena and Batista being put overly cleanly?
 
DISCUSSION - Triple H haters: How do you explain Cena and Batista being put overly cleanly?

Here is my best argument from a Pro-Triple H stance:

If a wrestler is almost a "sure thing" to become the next 'Franchise Guy' for the WWE, Triple H will do the clean JOB to the guy to get him over. Period.

Triple H jobbed cleanly to Cena in 2006 at Wrestlemania, and flat out tasted Dave Batista's penis on 3 different occasions in 2005.........one of which, was at Wrestlemania 21.

In recent memory, Brock Lesnar got the better of Triple H in their feud (Lesnar won 2 of 3 matches I believe).

While it's true that guys like Angle, Jericho, RVD, Orton, Booker T, Edge, and even Benoit (ultimately), and a long host of other wrestlers were unable to ultimately 'go over' Triple H to the point of ascending to that "next level" on a permanent basis, ask yourself this:

"Would any of the guys that Triple H supposedly buried...........would they have been true "Franchise Guys" in the manner that Bruno Sammartino, Hogan, Austin, The Rock, and John Cena were?


Pro-Triple H Stance Conclusion:

Triple H will put over guys that have a legit shot of being the next "Franchise Guy" in the WWE. As a result, Triple H is a guy that puts the business ahead of himself. By being so selective in who he JOBS to, it ultimately magnifies the effect of he does ultimately JOB to.

In those rare instances where Triple H does JOB..........it means something. Huge.

For this reason, I ultimately do think that Trips will do the right thing for business and allow for Daniel Bryan to ultimately 'get over' to the next level at some point.

Heisenberg 02-16-2014 12:06 AM

I am a Triple H fan and I believe he is simply what is best for business. I am 25% to blame for James Steele continuing his Triple H gimmick. I fed him the rep needed to get to the top and stuff.

Heisenberg 02-16-2014 12:10 AM

You'd get a little history of Triple H in his new DVD streaming on Netflix

Heyman 02-16-2014 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heisenberg (Post 4378720)
I am a Triple H fan and I believe he is simply what is best for business. I am 25% to blame for James Steele continuing his Triple H gimmick. I fed him the rep needed to get to the top and stuff.

While I do think Triple H has done a number of questionable things throughout his career, no one can deny the fact that he helped two potential 'franchise guys' in Cena and Batista go to that next level.

Triple H tapped out clean to Benoit at Mania as well. Granted - Benoit was pretty much buried after Wrestlemania, but Benoit was never going to be a legit long term franchise guy for the company anyways. Period.

Triple H added to Undertaker's already impressive legacy.

Three guys who I think Triple H could've done a better job with were the following:

-RVD
-Randy Orton
-Chris Jericho

However - in two of those cases (RVD and Orton), they proved to be unworthy at the time through their actions. RVD was busted with marijuana possession shortly after winning his World title, while Orton in 2004 was a complete douche backstage (and even in 2009 when a Legacy-lead Orton jobbed to Hunter at Mania).

The only ONE time where I felt Triple H let the WWE down, was in his dealings with Chris Jericho. Face Jericho going over Triple H in 2000 during that 'title win that never happened' match would have done wonders for Jericho.

Heisenberg 02-16-2014 12:20 AM

RVD pissed me off when he got in trouble, I was so proud of him getting a chance, but I always wonder if Sabu's push got stopped cause I thought he was doing on the new ECW shit

Anybody Thrilla 02-16-2014 12:24 AM

RVD shouldn't have pissed you off. It's not like he just started smoking weed after he won the title.

He-man, did you mention Angle in the first post? Angle definitely could have been THE man. They feuded over Stephanie's affection or something, right?

Hanso Amore 02-16-2014 12:37 AM

Add Sheamus to the list of people who HHH should have handled better.

Heres the problem with HHH....he will put Cena and Bats over only because they were the Franchise guys like you said. But anyone else he will bury to keep himself as a threat or at the top.

There is no reason a retired HHH should be going over the recent champ in Punk, or Lesnar who is being pushed as the Baddest guy on the roster, etc. He is "retired" but still pushes himself as the ultimate ass kicker that no one can beat.

Hanso Amore 02-16-2014 12:37 AM

Thats the CURRENT issue I have with him. Historically I think you can make a case that he put a few guys over, but Cena was ALREADY the top guy no thanks to him, but he did make Bats.

Hanso Amore 02-16-2014 12:38 AM

The guy also insists on inserting himself into a "main event" as Wrestlemania.

The Undertakers one match a year with the streak is a huge deal, but HHH pushes himself to that level as if anyone NEEDs to see him.

Heyman 02-16-2014 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anybody Thrilla (Post 4378744)
RVD shouldn't have pissed you off. It's not like he just started smoking weed after he won the title.

He-man, did you mention Angle in the first post? Angle definitely could have been THE man. They feuded over Stephanie's affection or something, right?

In regards to RVD, I don't think the WWE wanted their top guy to be known as someone that was pro-weed and what have you (although I concede the fact that it's quite hypocritical when guys like Hogan back in the day were 'franchise guys' and were avid roid monkeys).

RVD was way over when he first came here, but he was a fairly sloppy worker.......and did have a questionable character I guess.

As far as Kurt Angle goes, The Angle-HHH-Steph storyline actually did get Angle over big time, but I don't think the WWE felt comfortable in having Hunter converting into a face for the long term at the time............since Hunter was such a tremendous heel at the time. If you had HHH go face, he would've been behind Austin and The Rock.

As far as Kurt Angle goes - I actually think he could've been HUGE had the WWE kept him as a tweener throughout his career. The downfall of Kurt Angle, is that he was so awesome at being a heel, that the WWE always tried to then turn him face and would always tinker with his character too much as a face.

Angle as a tweener could've been a 'Franchise Guy'.........Triple H supported or not.

Hanso Amore 02-16-2014 12:44 AM

What do you think of this statement Heyman

While Hhh doesn't always devalue or hold down and bury his foes, he certainly uses others to elevate himself

Heyman 02-16-2014 12:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MatthewAllenHanso (Post 4378750)
Add Sheamus to the list of people who HHH should have handled better.

Heres the problem with HHH....he will put Cena and Bats over only because they were the Franchise guys like you said. But anyone else he will bury to keep himself as a threat or at the top.

Good point about Cena. However - a clean victory over Triple H still helped Cena establish even more credibility.

Quote:

There is no reason a retired HHH should be going over the recent champ in Punk, or Lesnar who is being pushed as the Baddest guy on the roster, etc. He is "retired" but still pushes himself as the ultimate ass kicker that no one can beat.
I completely agree with you on Punk.

Regarding Lesnar however - if it's in the WWE's long term plan to have Triple H still do meaningful jobs every now and then, then it doesn't make sense to have Triple H get completely squashed by Lesnar. Lesnar ultimately went over Hunter, but Triple H still has strong credibility as a result of him winning one of those matches.

p.s._______The above criticism by the way, can also be directed towards The Rock. "Retired" Rocky was able to defeat Cena and Punk. However - this ultimately lead to a 'credible' Rocky jobbing cleanly to Cena.

Hanso Amore 02-16-2014 12:49 AM

Fair point on the rock.

I just don't think hhh needs to establish anything. Beating Lesnar does nothing for him. But yet we still see him go over at wrestlemania then both go their way. Should Bryan beat him the push will be nothing about beating the guy that beat Lesnar but being beating the guy holding him down

Hanso Amore 02-16-2014 12:52 AM

If hhh truly cared about putting the right guys over he wouldn't have beaten punk while punk was the top face in the company. If punk wins there and then takes the title from del rio it would have done far more for him and been his big win in a weak run including his title run. Instead he loses, wins the title and doesn't main event and takes a 2nd fiddle to hhh vs lesnar

Also I find it funny that when hhh is in a title match it goes on last even over hogan rock but punk holds the title and hhh will go after him

Anybody Thrilla 02-16-2014 12:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by He-Man (Post 4378756)
In regards to RVD, I don't think the WWE wanted their top guy to be known as someone that was pro-weed and what have you (although I concede the fact that it's quite hypocritical when guys like Hogan back in the day were 'franchise guys' and were avid roid monkeys).

RVD was way over when he first came here, but he was a fairly sloppy worker.......and did have a questionable character I guess.

As far as Kurt Angle goes, The Angle-HHH-Steph storyline actually did get Angle over big time, but I don't think the WWE felt comfortable in having Hunter converting into a face for the long term at the time............since Hunter was such a tremendous heel at the time. If you had HHH go face, he would've been behind Austin and The Rock.

As far as Kurt Angle goes - I actually think he could've been HUGE had the WWE kept him as a tweener throughout his career. The downfall of Kurt Angle, is that he was so awesome at being a heel, that the WWE always tried to then turn him face and would always tinker with his character too much as a face.

Angle as a tweener could've been a 'Franchise Guy'.........Triple H supported or not.

Concerning RVD, what I originally said was directed at whoever said they were pissed at RVD for getting busted. I could personally give a shit if a wrestler smokes weed.

Heyman 02-16-2014 12:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MatthewAllenHanso (Post 4378757)
What do you think of this statement Heyman

While Hhh doesn't always devalue or hold down and bury his foes, he certainly uses others to elevate himself

Definitely a solid statement, and one that has a lot of truth to it.

However - I would also argue that Triple H worked his butt off to put himself in that position. During the Attitude Era, yes...........he was always "the guy" working with Austin and Rocky, but the WWE chose him to be in that spot for pretty good reasons.

Triple H obviously used the Kliq when he first entered the WWE so that he'd have friends in high places.

Triple H worked his butt off, acted shrewdly backstage, and the WWE ultimately gave him the keys.............for better or for worse.

Hanso Amore 02-16-2014 12:54 AM

Seriously hhh lobbied to go on last because of the title at the biggest show of the year


2nd biggest he goes on last over punk cena big show

Heyman 02-16-2014 12:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MatthewAllenHanso (Post 4378761)
If hhh truly cared about putting the right guys over he wouldn't have beaten punk while punk was the top face in the company. If punk wins there and then takes the title from del rio it would have done far more for him and been his big win in a weak run including his title run. Instead he loses, wins the title and doesn't main event and takes a 2nd fiddle to hhh vs lesnar

Also I find it funny that when hhh is in a title match it goes on last even over hogan rock but punk holds the title and hhh will go after him

I completely agree with about Punk.

CM Punk was hot shit back in 2011 and that is definitely one instance where Triple H should have done the JOB.

Anybody Thrilla 02-16-2014 12:56 AM

Also, whoever said that Cena was made before Triple H jobbed to him, I'm going to have to disagree. Triple H matches at that time had the same aura that Cena matches do now. You just KNEW Triple H was going to win. When he didn't, you knew something big was happening. Just like Cena now.

Hanso Amore 02-16-2014 12:58 AM

I think hhh takes more shit than he should from fans but he also deserves some level of shit.

I just think of his peers and it seems like he's done less to leave a good business than others which is ironic since he now runs the company.

Just imagine hhh taking a triple power bomb from the shield and disappearing. I can't either. But taker does it. And he's a rung above hhh

Hanso Amore 02-16-2014 12:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anybody Thrilla (Post 4378766)
Also, whoever said that Cena was made before Triple H jobbed to him, I'm going to have to disagree. Triple H matches at that time had the same aura that Cena matches do now. You just KNEW Triple H was going to win. When he didn't, you knew something big was happening. Just like Cena now.

I dunno cena was champ for a year at that point...

Hanso Amore 02-16-2014 01:01 AM

Cena went over jbl Jericho and angle and was champ a year...he was already the face of the company....but sure the hhh match was the icing on the cake

Anybody Thrilla 02-16-2014 01:04 AM

The Triple H match SOLIDIFIED it.

Anybody Thrilla 02-16-2014 01:05 AM

Even though Cena had done all of that, everybody I watched that show with was pretty shocked when Cena won.

Anybody Thrilla 02-16-2014 01:05 AM

And that was pretty much the last time we'd ever be shocked by a Cena win again...besides arguably HBK at 23.

Hanso Amore 02-16-2014 01:11 AM

I dunno I felt different. I felt like super cena would win that and I haven't been shocked by a loss since. His few losses have been star making. Edge, Bryan, punk.

Hanso Amore 02-16-2014 01:12 AM

You could argue del rio as well.

Anybody Thrilla 02-16-2014 01:27 AM

Del Rio beat Cena?

#1-norm-fan 02-16-2014 03:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anybody Thrilla (Post 4378772)
And that was pretty much the last time we'd ever be shocked by a Cena win again...besides arguably HBK at 23.

Who in their right mind would have been picking HBK to win that match??

SlickyTrickyDamon 02-16-2014 03:47 AM

HBK was a replacement for HHH who got his quad broken a month before the PPV. I hope nobody if they remembered that.

Bad News Gertner 02-16-2014 08:46 AM

Awesome, so 2 rights fix 1000 wrongs

XL 02-16-2014 09:53 AM

You could argue its a chicken/egg type situation.

HHH doesn't put over the guys that he thinks won't be franchise players.

Or

HHH doesn't put them over so they don't become franchise players.

Hanso Amore 02-16-2014 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anybody Thrilla (Post 4378788)
Del Rio beat Cena?

Yes. Del rio took punks title then beat cena in a 3 way and also in a last man standing match then cena left he title scene to work with the rock.

Hanso Amore 02-16-2014 11:02 AM

So to the point of the thread, cena puts more people over more often when it makes sense. Also while he's a much bigger name and star than hhh. Cena has been the face of the company for 10 years and beating him means far more than hhh.

Savio 02-16-2014 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anybody Thrilla (Post 4378772)
And that was pretty much the last time we'd ever be shocked by a Cena win again...besides arguably HBK at 23.

Until he beats Taker at Mania.

Anybody Thrilla 02-16-2014 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MatthewAllenHanso (Post 4378852)
So to the point of the thread, cena puts more people over more often when it makes sense. Also while he's a much bigger name and star than hhh. Cena has been the face of the company for 10 years and beating him means far more than hhh.

Well yes, obviously it does NOW. I was just saying that Cena became MADE with the Triple H victory. Like, FOR REAL made. Basically going from Randy Orton level to...well, John Cena level.

Anybody Thrilla 02-16-2014 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan (Post 4378818)
Who in their right mind would have been picking HBK to win that match??

The Heartbreak Kid doesn't lay down for anybody.

Anybody Thrilla 02-16-2014 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Savior (Post 4378854)
Until he beats Taker at Mania.

Also quite possible.

McLegend 02-16-2014 11:51 AM

I think Cena was extremely over before HHH. Cena was already made, and you guys are overstating HHH's impact on Cena's career.

Innovator 02-16-2014 12:03 PM

I remember the feeling around Mania 22 was that a lot of people wanted Triple H to win to break up the monotony of Cena's title run, with Cena being booed out of a lot of buildings.

JR on commentary made it seem like the Chicago crowd was full of Nick Bockwinkles

Innovator 02-16-2014 12:03 PM

I remember the feeling around Mania 22 was that a lot of people wanted Triple H to win to break up the monotony of Cena's title run, with Cena being booed out of a lot of buildings.

JR on commentary made it seem like the Chicago crowd was full of Nick Bockwinkles

Hanso Amore 02-16-2014 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by McLegend (Post 4378862)
I think Cena was extremely over before HHH. Cena was already made, and you guys are overstating HHH's impact on Cena's career.

To be honest I forgot this match even happened in the main event of mania until it was brought up in this thread. I thought it was much later and was not memorable

Bobo 02-16-2014 01:24 PM

He's still a twat regardless.

Anybody Thrilla 02-16-2014 01:25 PM

It was memorable as fuck.

McLegend 02-16-2014 02:03 PM

I don't remember the match, but I remember months before Cena feuded with Angle and Cena was constantly booed.

HHH blamed the booing of Cena on Angle being a poor heel. Then HHH showed us how to be a great heel and Cena still got booed out of the building.

Innovator 02-16-2014 02:20 PM

To be fair, he did come out dressed as Conan the Barbarian, ultimate heel?

Heyman 02-16-2014 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anybody Thrilla (Post 4378857)
Well yes, obviously it does NOW. I was just saying that Cena became MADE with the Triple H victory. Like, FOR REAL made. Basically going from Randy Orton level to...well, John Cena level.

Exactly.

Ol Dirty Dastard 02-16-2014 02:21 PM

Pretty much what Gertner says. Every so often he'll put someone over, but it always seems so pointless with all the guys he's buried, with his never ending need to be over as some ultimate ass kicker. I never think it's a big deal when he does anything, he is tired and old.

In saying that, he's definitely had some great moments in his career, but he has killed the momentum of a lot of guys that were fun to that point, where he put the kiss of death on them.

Anybody Thrilla 02-16-2014 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by McLegend (Post 4378932)
I don't remember the match, but I remember months before Cena feuded with Angle and Cena was constantly booed.

HHH blamed the booing of Cena on Angle being a poor heel. Then HHH showed us how to be a great heel and Cena still got booed out of the building.

Right. From being booed to being BOOED OUT OF THE BUILDING.

The final push.

Hanso Amore 02-16-2014 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anybody Thrilla (Post 4378857)
Well yes, obviously it does NOW. I was just saying that Cena became MADE with the Triple H victory. Like, FOR REAL made. Basically going from Randy Orton level to...well, John Cena level.

Maybe Orton would be on the same level as Cena if HHH hadnt cut him down so many times.

Hanso Amore 02-16-2014 03:39 PM

But seriously Cena went from getting booed against Angle and Jericho to Booed against HHH to booed against Edge and RVD and so on.

HHH literally had zero impact on any of that. I think you are applying your own shock to everyone's opinion when I think more people would agree the match wasnt a big deal or memorable. In fact I think his match with HBK (HHH fill in as mentioned) did way more for him because it showed how great Cena can be in the ring with the right people.

Nark Order 02-16-2014 03:50 PM

It isn't that Triple H is a horrible guy (he seems to be based on everything I've seen, but that isn't what i don't like him), he just has an outlook on the business that I don't agree with. It doesn't help that he was an asshole that scraped and clawed his way to the top and fucked people over when hew as on top, but plenty before him had the same mentality. Triple H, like many others, have a perspective that puts people towards the top that look and seem a certain way. Triple H put over guys like Batista, John Cena, Brock Lesnar, and Sheamus, yeah. What do you suppose all of these guys have in common? Big hulking ridiculous looking people that are overflowing with testosterone. When it comes to guys like Punk, RVD, Bryan, Christian, Jericho... They don't fit the mold of what he views a champion should look like, so he constantly does everything in his power to protect a view of the business that is stale, antiquated, and completely bias. Even Benoit, Triple H put him over at Wrestlemania (in a triple threat match) but immediately started planting seeds for "his boy" Orton afterwards. Orton gets the belt and mysteriously what happens a month later? Orton "wasn't ready" and Triple H has the belt again.

I could talk about how shitty of a guy he is in terms of power, but mainly I hate his view of what the business should be and what the business should look like. He's one of e last guys holding on to that perspective and it is really a poison that is holding the entire history back.

Anybody Thrilla 02-16-2014 03:55 PM

It wasn't just me.

Maybe Orton would be bigger if HHH had put him over. Sure.

Speaking of 23, I fucking love that match. It feels like a lot of people shit on it here, though. No clue why.

Regardless, Cena was already MADE by then. And Triple H did it. I think you're letting your hatred for Triple H think here. None of those people that he was getting booed against were even legitimate stars yet, really. I love Jericho, but no. Edge is OK, but no. A case could MAYBE be made for Kurt Angle, but not even. Triple H was THAT DUDE to beat to cross the threshold, not just from a smark perspective, but in the eyes of EVERYONE that watches WWE.

Look, I'm not a Triple H fan. I never really have been. I remember what I saw, though.

DAMN iNATOR 02-16-2014 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heisenberg (Post 4378738)
RVD pissed me off when he got in trouble, I was so proud of him getting a chance, but I always wonder if Sabu's push got stopped cause I thought he was doing on the new ECW shit

RVD didn't piss me off but he did disappoint me. I thought he'd know better than to be in possession of weed in his car. As for Sabu, him being with Rob certainly didn't do him any favors, but he ultimately contributed to his own demise in WWE(CW) by constantly showing up late to events and having various behavioral problems.

Bad News Gertner 02-16-2014 04:18 PM

HHH is correct in the regard with once in a liftime exceptions, wrestlers shouldn't look like fucking gas station attendants and fuck cares about workrate.

Nark Order 02-16-2014 04:27 PM

Yeah. And every woman should have triple D tits and look like Trish Stratus. Right?

Bad News Gertner 02-16-2014 04:28 PM

In a dream world yes.

Nark Order 02-16-2014 04:30 PM

You are part of the problem, it seems.

Anybody Thrilla 02-16-2014 04:30 PM

Only Narc would bitch about that.

Nark Order 02-16-2014 04:37 PM

Hey. Chauvinism. Let's party.

el bobbo 02-16-2014 04:45 PM

Don't get pissed at RVD for smoking weed. Get pissed at the government for imposing a 90+ year prohibition on it.

Hanso Amore 02-16-2014 04:47 PM

Narc must prefer the Tuesday afternoon squad at the strip club.

OF course the sex objects of a medium targeted at males should be attractive.

Hanso Amore 02-16-2014 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el bobbo (Post 4379031)
Don't get pissed at RVD for smoking weed. Get pissed at the government for imposing a 90+ year prohibition on it.

Fuck yeah good point. And we shouldnt be mad at Benoit, be mad at the societal aversion to murder.

Nark Order 02-16-2014 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MatthewAllenHanso (Post 4379038)
Narc must prefer the Tuesday afternoon squad at the strip club.

OF course the sex objects of a medium targeted at males should be attractive.

I'm not really arguing that they should be attractive.

ron the dial 02-16-2014 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MatthewAllenHanso (Post 4379039)
Fuck yeah good point. And we shouldnt be mad at Benoit, be mad at the societal aversion to murder.

yeah that's definitely a legit comparison

Bad News Gertner 02-16-2014 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Narcissus (Post 4379025)
You are part of the problem, it seems.

No, the majority. And I'd rather have Maryse than Trish. That accent!

Hanso Amore 02-16-2014 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ron the dial (Post 4379046)
yeah that's definitely a legit comparison

The basis is he same. To be mad at the law and not the person who broke it is silly and stupid. Not comparing the acts.

Brigstocke 02-16-2014 07:53 PM

I feel that as an outstanding poster and general pillar of the wider community the following statement from Brigstocke should be taken as Gospel.

HHH is an absolute Cunt. Yes its got a capital 'C' to place emphasis on the sheer magnitude of his overall Cuntdom.

He does have a glorious back though :-/

James Steele 02-16-2014 08:19 PM

Your mother is an absolute Cunt with a capital C.

Heisenberg 02-16-2014 08:20 PM

IT'S TIME TO PLAY THE GAME

Heyman 02-16-2014 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MatthewAllenHanso (Post 4378852)
So to the point of the thread, cena puts more people over more often when it makes sense. Also while he's a much bigger name and star than hhh. Cena has been the face of the company for 10 years and beating him means far more than hhh.

This is a great point and one that I would agree with.

Here is one thing I'd have to ask though.

If Triple H and Vince McMahon do not like "smaller guys" like Daniel Bryan at all costs, and do not have any intention of pushing Bryan as a World Champion long term, then why would they have him go CLEANLY over John Cena at Summerslam?.............one on one to boot!

Savio 02-16-2014 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anybody Thrilla (Post 4379006)
It wasn't just me.

Maybe Orton would be bigger if HHH had put him over. Sure.

HHH always makes Orton look like a bitch... like even with this story line right now.

Hanso Amore 02-16-2014 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by He-Man (Post 4379143)
This is a great point and one that I would agree with.

Here is one thing I'd have to ask though.

If Triple H and Vince McMahon do not like "smaller guys" like Daniel Bryan at all costs, and do not have any intention of pushing Bryan as a World Champion long term, then why would they have him go CLEANLY over John Cena at Summerslam?.............one on one to boot!

I dont buy that they dont like small guys. Hbk is one of their all time closest wrestlers. I tend to agree with their views on size in regards to the supposed heavyweight champion . They push the right smaller guys.

But hhh would never put one over himself. Hes too bad ass to lose to a skinny fat punk.

Cena is mich better with letting his ego not get in the way

Bad News Gertner 02-16-2014 09:41 PM

HBK got a push because Vince was afraid of going to jail for steroids. He was also a shit draw as was Bret.

Hanso Amore 02-16-2014 11:46 PM

Oh Jesus can anyone say anything about hbk without gertner chiming in With that shit.

Whatever. He made a ton of money till the end and was always pushed. His size never held him back with Vince.

#1-norm-fan 02-17-2014 12:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bad News Gertner (Post 4379020)
HHH is correct in the regard with once in a liftime exceptions, wrestlers shouldn't look like fucking gas station attendants and fuck cares about workrate.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Narcissus (Post 4379023)
Yeah. And every woman should have triple D tits and look like Trish Stratus. Right?

If you're making a porn and you wanna make money, you should probably choose to have it feature chicks who look more like Trish Stratus and less like Nicole Bass.

If you're making a wrestling organization and you want to make money, you should probably choose to have it star guys who look more like Hogan/Cena than guys who look like they were signed straight from a Bum Fights video.

CSL 02-17-2014 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MatthewAllenHanso (Post 4379210)
Oh Jesus can anyone say anything about hbk without gertner chiming in With that shit.

Whatever. He made a ton of money till the end and was always pushed. His size never held him back with Vince.

overstating the size part a bit, 1995-96 Shawn Michaels would be one of the "bigger guys" on the roster rn. There was certainly a dropoff from the cartoon physiques of the late 80's but those mid/late 90's guys were still pretty huge compared to guys like Punk, Ziggler etc today.

Hanso Amore 02-17-2014 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSL (Post 4379303)
overstating the size part a bit, 1995-96 Shawn Michaels would be one of the "bigger guys" on the roster rn. There was certainly a dropoff from the cartoon physiques of the late 80's but those mid/late 90's guys were still pretty huge compared to guys like Punk, Ziggler etc today.

I dunno about that. The only guy getting a push that was smaller tHan michaels was Owen. Look at mid 96.

Taker, gold dust, Ahmed, farooq, vader, Kane, rock, Kama, crush, doa, etc all bigger guys.

Hbk was never really that small. Dude was 6'1 he dwarfs punk and Bryan. But he was the small guy in his era and it didn't stop him.

Bad News Gertner 02-17-2014 09:14 AM

HBK whined and cried until he got his belt and whined and cried once he got it. He's the Honky Tonk Man of WWF champions.

Innovator 02-17-2014 10:53 AM

He also whined and cried after those 30 Marines collectively jumped him for no reason whatsoever while Davey Boy and XPac were doing lines off of his beaten body.

Anybody Thrilla 02-17-2014 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MatthewAllenHanso (Post 4379090)
The basis is he same. To be mad at the law and not the person who broke it is silly and stupid. Not comparing the acts.

No dude. Stop.

Anybody Thrilla 02-17-2014 12:29 PM

Jaywalking is illegal, and if you do it, you are as stupid as a murderer because it is illegal. No. Even weed is legal in some places now.

Brigstocke 02-17-2014 12:36 PM

If I shoplift a can of Pepsi I might aswell Rape Homicide the minge off of some chavvy slag from the local estate?

Anybody Thrilla 02-17-2014 12:37 PM

Yeah, you got it.

Nark Order 02-17-2014 12:45 PM

Hanso, how are you so dumb sometimes? Like how? Could you write it out for me or provide a diagram?

Brigstocke 02-17-2014 12:54 PM

Yeah Hanso. Make Tubby a Pie Chart.

Nark Order 02-17-2014 01:06 PM

NOW

Hanso Amore 02-17-2014 02:16 PM

Maybe you mofos should learn to read, or maybe read what I actual posted instead of piling on because Thrilla disagreed.

Go back to my first post when I actually mentioned Murder.

Did I say Smoking weed = Murder? Oooopps, nope.

I was responding to idiot Bobbo saying to blame the government for weed being illegal instead of the person who broke the law. Therefore In murder, jaywalking etc its not the act thats wrong, its the law.

Maybe you can draw me a venn diagram of all the dicks in the world that are circumcised on one side, and all in the world that are not on the other, then the intersection and overlap of all the dicks you have gobbled down like a starving dog in the middle.

Hanso Amore 02-17-2014 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anybody Thrilla (Post 4379362)
Jaywalking is illegal, and if you do it, you are as stupid as a murderer because it is illegal. No. Even weed is legal in some places now.

Go back and read what I said.

Anybody Thrilla 02-17-2014 02:36 PM

I'd love to, but I'm far too busy at the moment.

Brigstocke 02-17-2014 02:37 PM

I love it when people No Sell finishers.

Nark Order 02-17-2014 02:49 PM

ABT, you use the other drinking fountain. It's the law.

Swiss Ultimate 02-17-2014 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MatthewAllenHanso (Post 4379039)
Fuck yeah good point. And we shouldnt be mad at Benoit, be mad at the societal aversion to murder.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ron the dial (Post 4379046)
yeah that's definitely a legit comparison

:rofl:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®