TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   wrestling forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Is AJ Lee collateral damage? (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=126186)

Dukelorange 03-11-2014 09:54 PM

Is AJ Lee collateral damage?
 
With CM Punk gone, AJ has lost several matches to various divas. So you guys think is because of her relationship with CM Punk? A delayed reaction from that previous incident? Perhaps the WWE is one again letting MORE great divas out the door by just not pushing the division?

Razzamajazz 03-11-2014 09:58 PM

no

#1-norm-fan 03-11-2014 10:00 PM

Is she losing more than usual? She's been losing non-title matches and then winning title matches. That's WWE's booking for all their champions.

Lock Jaw 03-11-2014 10:01 PM

AJ has been losing to all the Total Divas since that show began. It isn't a new "post-CM Punk leaving" thing.

END THREAD.

Purgatory 03-11-2014 10:18 PM

Theres talk of having her drop the title, but they didn't say to who.

Savio 03-11-2014 11:30 PM

Wont be surprised if she loses it at mania, gotta lose it sometime. Sine vince doesn't want to piss punk off she might keep it however.

Wishbone 03-11-2014 11:58 PM

So long as she doesn't drop it to one of the Bellas or Cameron, and as long as she doesn't descend into jobberdom I don't see an issue. A match with Natalya, Naomi, or someone else that can actually wrestle that results in her losing is perfectly fine and just part of the wrestling business.

It's honestly such a shame that WWE doesn't push the Divas division more. It's not like they'd loose anything by doing so either. The women that can actually wrestle tend to be just as good looking (if not more so) than the idiots they constantly put on tv.

Shisen Kopf 03-12-2014 12:09 AM

Wonder what AJ Lee's make's of this'

Bad News Gertner 03-12-2014 02:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wishbone (Post 4393393)
So long as she doesn't drop it to one of the Bellas or Cameron, and as long as she doesn't descend into jobberdom I don't see an issue. A match with Natalya, Naomi, or someone else that can actually wrestle that results in her losing is perfectly fine and just part of the wrestling business.

It's honestly such a shame that WWE doesn't push the Divas division more. It's not like they'd loose anything by doing so either. The women that can actually wrestle tend to be just as good looking (if not more so) than the idiots they constantly put on tv.

Nobody cares about workrate or womens wrestling.

Fignuts 03-12-2014 02:13 AM

People used to during the Trish/Lita/Mickie years.

Not going to get back to that again by not pushing the division. Then again, people liked liked Diva's back then because they were hot, and they could put on a fun match.

How many Diva's right now can put on a good match? 2? Maybe 3?

Wishbone 03-12-2014 02:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bad News Gertner (Post 4393477)
Nobody cares about workrate or womens wrestling.

That's why an internet workhorse is headlining Wrestlemania, and is the most over performer in the last decade while a supposed quintessential superstar is being buried with a mountain of boos and was forced to turn heel because of it, right?

el bobbo 03-12-2014 02:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fignuts (Post 4393484)
People used to during the Trish/Lita/Mickie years.

Not going to get back to that again by not pushing the division. Then again, people liked liked Diva's back then because they were hot, and they could put on a fun match.

How many Diva's right now can put on a good match? 2? Maybe 3?

AJ, Natty...

the NXT chicks are so much better than the current crop. (Emma, Paige, Summer Rae).

I just watched the WrestleMania from 2010 and noticed that Alicia Fox was in the 5 on 5 match. They have to keep these women on board for political reasons emanating from the Linda McMahon shit.

Wishbone 03-12-2014 02:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fignuts (Post 4393484)
People used to during the Trish/Lita/Mickie years.

Not going to get back to that again by not pushing the division. Then again, people liked liked Diva's back then because they were hot, and they could put on a fun match.

How many Diva's right now can put on a good match? 2? Maybe 3?

On the active roster? Natalya, AJ Lee, Naomi and to a lesser extent Emma and Summer Rae from what I've heard. NXT also supposedly has quite a few women that can actually put on good matches. Stupid thing is that all those women I mentioned are just as, if not more attractive than the shit we see being pushed on tv. The problem isn't lack of good women's wrestlers, it's lack of actual time for them to wrestle good matches. Honestly I'd go as far as to say that WWE's women's division is more stacked today then it was during the Lita/Trish years. It's just that the women today don't get to show it.

Bad News Gertner 03-12-2014 02:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wishbone (Post 4393487)
That's why an internet workhorse is headlining Wrestlemania, and is the most over performer in the last decade while a supposed quintessential superstar is being buried with a mountain of boos and was forced to turn heel because of it, right?

Because he developed a personality.

Wishbone 03-12-2014 02:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bad News Gertner (Post 4393501)
Because he developed a personality.

Not seeing your point here exactly, Gerty...

Bad News Gertner 03-12-2014 02:34 AM

That doesn't surprise me

Fignuts 03-12-2014 02:39 AM

I miss Victoria. Best ass ever. And the widow's peak was an awesome finisher.

Wishbone 03-12-2014 02:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fignuts (Post 4393510)
I miss Victoria. Best ass ever. And the widow's peak was an awesome finisher.

Shame Victoria and Mickey didn't get to finish that little storyline they had going with the "hit list" thing Victoria was doing. Could have been really interesting for WWE.

Wishbone 03-12-2014 02:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bad News Gertner (Post 4393506)
That doesn't surprise me

Are you insinuating that women can't have personalities? If so that's very sexist of you, and that's bad m'kay.

Bad News Gertner 03-12-2014 02:56 AM

Daniel Bryan isn't where he is if he didn't develop a personality.

Daniel Bryan without a personality is Tyson Kidd

#1-norm-fan 03-12-2014 07:35 AM

By "personality" of course, you mean he starting yelling "Yes!" a lot.

Blonde Moment 03-12-2014 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bad News Gertner (Post 4393532)
Daniel Bryan isn't where he is if he didn't develop a personality.

Daniel Bryan without a personality is Tyson Kidd

For the most part i do agree with this but I think it helps if they let the performers put more of themselves into their character then just what the higher ups want. It is far easier to be someone you can identify with then someone you cannot.

Would Austin have made it as the "Ringmaster" I don't think so.

JimmyMess 03-12-2014 09:48 AM

The Divas Title doesn't matter, nor the champion, because women aren't real people, especially in wrestling.

Dukelorange 03-12-2014 12:36 PM

Doing a little research on the 'net, I discovered that most divas are actually good in the ring. As with the men, it requires chemistry between the two and time to have the match develop. Couple that with a story that the audience can invest their time in and you should be okay.

#1-norm-fan 03-12-2014 01:13 PM

No. Chicks move pretty awkwardly in the ring.

Emperor Smeat 03-12-2014 02:04 PM

Her losing right now has nothing to do with Punk's status and more because the WWE cares way more about Total Divas than the actual division.

They are just following a similar path they did with Season 1 for Season 2's promotion albeit with the rumored difference of a title change occurring at Mania as part of the season finale.

Dukelorange 03-12-2014 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan (Post 4393709)
No. Chicks move pretty awkwardly in the ring.

The girls are smaller and are... girls, so the distances from rope to rope is longer.

XL 03-12-2014 07:10 PM

I think you'll find the distance between the ropes is exactly the same.

XL 03-12-2014 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan (Post 4393709)
No. Chicks move pretty awkwardly in the ring.

This x1,000,000.

A great women's match is an average match in real terms.

Savio 03-12-2014 07:27 PM

Naomi and AJ had a pretty good match on NXT before, they were given more time though since it was the All women's season.

Vastardikai 03-12-2014 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XL (Post 4393878)
I think you'll find the distance between the ropes is exactly the same.

women don't have the same gait as men.

Here's a solid example of running the ropes.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/i0vxPCCXjG4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

#1-norm-fan 03-12-2014 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dukelorange (Post 4393874)
The girls are smaller and are... girls, so the distances from rope to rope is longer.

lol. This is not an excuse for moving awkwardly in the ring.

And even if it were, too bad. They're still awkward in the ring and it makes for awkward wrestling matches. Whatever the reason.

Bad News Gertner 03-12-2014 10:37 PM

This is the most ridiculous discussion yet. Womens gait.

Shisen Kopf 03-12-2014 10:56 PM

Women's work gait is serious business

JimmyMess 03-12-2014 11:14 PM

the problem is, WWE hires female models (for the most part) and tries to train them to be wrestlers.

Where as the men (for the most part) are wrestlers/pro athletes, who they then try to convert to entertain over pure rasslin

#1-norm-fan 03-12-2014 11:50 PM

Womengait 2014

Fignuts 03-13-2014 01:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimmyMess (Post 4394000)
the problem is, WWE hires female models (for the most part) and tries to train them to be wrestlers.

Where as the men (for the most part) are wrestlers/pro athletes, who they then try to convert to entertain over pure rasslin

Pretty much this. Watch some AJW from back in the day. Not awkward at all, and in fact boasts some of the best wrestling matches ever, male or female.

GD 03-13-2014 03:19 AM

Yes. AJ Lee publicly embraced Punk at an airport recently. Such an interaction between a heel and a face is not appreciated in the business of professional wrestling. Following Punk's departure from the company, AJ Lee's push has come to a screeching halt. After winning the secondary Divas Championship, she was set to win the prestigious WWE Women's Championship which was to be resurrected at the showcase of the immortals - Wrestlemania. She was slated to fight some of the greatest women's wrestlers of all time in a gauntlet match. Some of the names that were expected were Michelle McCool, Lita, Trish Stratus, Molly Holly, Beth Phoenix and Gail Kim (Christian was to make an appearance at Bound for Glory in return). Unfortunately, none of it is going to happen. She is scheduled to lose the secondary belt to her protege Tamina Snuka in a record time of 5 seconds at Wrestlemania. AJ Lee will eventually be released from the WWE due to her affiliation with CM Punk.

XL 03-13-2014 05:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vastardikai (Post 4393905)
women don't have the same gait as men.

Here's a solid example of running the ropes.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/i0vxPCCXjG4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

This is true, but the distance between the ropes is still the same.

#1-norm-fan 03-13-2014 06:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fignuts (Post 4394056)
Pretty much this. Watch some AJW from back in the day. Not awkward at all, and in fact boasts some of the best wrestling matches ever, male or female.

I'm gonna need to see a specific match that ranks with the greatest matches ever that features two women.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®