TPWW Forums

TPWW Forums (https://www.tpwwforums.com/index.php)
-   wrestling forum (https://www.tpwwforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Sports Entertainment Bloggers (https://www.tpwwforums.com/showthread.php?t=130915)

The CyNick 01-14-2016 11:37 AM

Sports Entertainment Bloggers
 
Using this thread to criticize what passes for journalism in this industry

road doggy dogg 01-14-2016 11:39 AM

Ryan Clark

CSL 01-14-2016 11:48 AM

98% of them are dog shit. That's about all there is to it.

The CyNick 01-14-2016 12:17 PM

"For what it's worth, and plans are always changing, but F4Wonline.com reports that the finish for the 30-man Royal Rumble main event is written and whatever they have planned to happen is going to set up a big match at the February 21st Fastlane pay-per-view. WWE officials reportedly want Fastlane to be an A-level pay-per-view and not just another stop on the Road to WrestleMania."

The breaking news here from one of the so-called industry leaders:

1. An upcoming Network Special has a finish booked (what is the actual finish? Well that would require inside information).

2. A future Network Special will have a "big match". (More shocking news at 11)

How is this acceptable?

Icame4Hookers 01-14-2016 12:27 PM

Jun Ross

Bad News Gertner 01-14-2016 12:32 PM

The only good one .....is ME Bad News Gertner!


Wooo Cheap Plug Time!

Check out Mr.Dufour's Wayback Machine this Saturday on 411mania.com where we.looks back at a WWF Madison Square Garden show from Mar.16 1981 featuring Backlund vs Stan Hansen in the main event

Evil Vito 01-14-2016 12:33 PM

<font color=goldenrod>Meltzer and Alvarez are about the only people I would give any credence to with rumors.</font>

Rammsteinmad 01-14-2016 12:48 PM

Instead of whinging about it, you could just, I dunno... not read it?

Rammsteinmad 01-14-2016 12:49 PM

But then again, I whinge about Raw every week, skim through it in ten minutes, and then whinge some more. So whatever.

CSL 01-14-2016 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The CyNick (Post 4756487)
"For what it's worth, and plans are always changing, but F4Wonline.com reports that the finish for the 30-man Royal Rumble main event is written and whatever they have planned to happen is going to set up a big match at the February 21st Fastlane pay-per-view. WWE officials reportedly want Fastlane to be an A-level pay-per-view and not just another stop on the Road to WrestleMania."

The breaking news here from one of the so-called industry leaders:

1. An upcoming Network Special has a finish booked (what is the actual finish? Well that would require inside information).

2. A future Network Special will have a "big match". (More shocking news at 11)

How is this acceptable?

lol "Network Special". You're adorable. If I could pinch your cheek through a computer monitor, I definitely would.

Schlomey 01-14-2016 01:14 PM

I still only read John Canton's stuff.....he doesn't suck and he is actually a reallly good guy.

Heisenberg 01-14-2016 01:42 PM

Meltzer sheep

Shisen Kopf 01-14-2016 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heisenberg (Post 4756519)
Meltzer sheep,,,,,,,


Heisenberg 01-14-2016 03:11 PM

thanks, future KOTF

XL 01-14-2016 03:57 PM

The quality of "real" journalism has plummeted since social media took off, it's all about getting hits, screw the integrity. Ya think an industry as ropey as wrestling should have more integrity?

road doggy dogg 01-14-2016 03:59 PM

That's true of every industry, sadly.

The CyNick 01-15-2016 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSL (Post 4756500)
lol "Network Special". You're adorable. If I could pinch your cheek through a computer monitor, I definitely would.

What do you call them?

The CyNick 01-15-2016 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XL (Post 4756587)
The quality of "real" journalism has plummeted since social media took off, it's all about getting hits, screw the integrity. Ya think an industry as ropey as wrestling should have more integrity?

there's never really been any "real" journalism in the industry. The market leaders make things up. The other sites cut and paste their made up stuff.

Mr. Nerfect 01-16-2016 08:55 PM

Dave Meltzer is pretty legit.

SlickyTrickyDamon 01-16-2016 09:16 PM

Keller and Meltzer are the standard bearers. Anybody else is pretty much copy and paste crap.

NotSam is pretty good for podcasting.

SlickyTrickyDamon 01-16-2016 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The CyNick (Post 4756487)
"For what it's worth, and plans are always changing, but F4Wonline.com reports that the finish for the 30-man Royal Rumble main event is written and whatever they have planned to happen is going to set up a big match at the February 21st Fastlane pay-per-view. WWE officials reportedly want Fastlane to be an A-level pay-per-view and not just another stop on the Road to WrestleMania."

The breaking news here from one of the so-called industry leaders:

1. An upcoming Network Special has a finish booked (what is the actual finish? Well that would require inside information).

2. A future Network Special will have a "big match". (More shocking news at 11)

How is this acceptable?

Sounds like Wiki's stub page for the ppv.

Background
See also: Professional wrestling
Fastlane will feature professional wrestling matches that involved wrestlers from pre-existing scripted feuds or storylines that play out on WWE's primary television programs, Raw and SmackDown. Wrestlers will portray heroes or villains as they follow a series of events that build tension and culminate in a wrestling match or series of matches.[2][3]

Heisenberg 01-16-2016 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noid (Post 4757206)
Dave Meltzer is pretty legit.

Meltzer sheep,,,

Ol Dirty Dastard 01-17-2016 01:03 PM

I think CyNick resents Dave Meltzer due to his success as a wrestling reporter

The CyNick 01-17-2016 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gorgeous Dale Newstead (Post 4757333)
I think CyNick resents Dave Meltzer due to his success as a wrestling reporter

I say good for him.

My issue is with the quality. I think we should expect more. People like you have no standards I guess.

There's no way you can read the "report" I posted in this thread and say it's good journalism.

Imagine if an NFL insider said "the Super Bowl" has been worked out. It will feature two football teams".

Simple Fan 01-17-2016 05:08 PM

That doesnt work. Its more like the season finale of Walking Dead has been worked out and someone will die. You cant compare journalism from a real sport to somthing that is a tv show. Your standards for wrestling journalism seem to be a little high.

Ol Dirty Dastard 01-17-2016 08:27 PM

His standards for wrestling journalism aren't applicable to wrestling journalism. For a guy who has clearly spent years watching wrestling he doesn't really seem to understand it at all. And he only seems to like WWE which I can only assume means he's not a wrestling fan, he's a WWE fan.

BigCrippyZ 01-18-2016 01:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simple Fan (Post 4757422)
That doesnt work. Its more like the season finale of Walking Dead has been worked out and someone will die. You cant compare journalism from a real sport to somthing that is a tv show. Your standards for wrestling journalism seem to be a little high.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gorgeous Dale Newstead (Post 4757461)
His standards for wrestling journalism aren't applicable to wrestling journalism. For a guy who has clearly spent years watching wrestling he doesn't really seem to understand it at all. And he only seems to like WWE which I can only assume means he's not a wrestling fan, he's a WWE fan.

This and this. :yes:

CyNick is a guy that thinks he knows way more than he actually does.

It's doubtful he's ever actually worked in news, media or entertainment for any significantly sized company. He's likely never negotiated a television rights deal or negotiated any kind of agreement re: the rights for the public performance or broadcast of intellectual property. He's most likely never negotiated any kind of business deal larger than selling his own house or car.

He's almost positively never sat in on a board meeting or business affairs meeting for a major international company while they discussed their plans, goals, strategies and annual and quarterly results as it relates to ratings, subscriber counts, sales, profits, loss, debt, credit, revenues, assets, liabilities, etc., let alone been a part of negotiations with them or on the company's behalf.

As much as Cynick would like to think (and like US to think) that we just don't understand and that he has some greater overall understanding of the WWE's, the media, television or the entertainment industries inner business workings, ratings, finances, goals, strategies, etc. He simply doesn't.

He's simply a tool.

Mr. Nerfect 01-18-2016 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The CyNick (Post 4757417)
I say good for him.

My issue is with the quality. I think we should expect more. People like you have no standards I guess.

There's no way you can read the "report" I posted in this thread and say it's good journalism.

Imagine if an NFL insider said "the Super Bowl" has been worked out. It will feature two football teams".

Actually, the idea that Fastlane will feature a big match and not just be a filler PPV is actually informative, as is wanting it to be an "A-level PPV." It could be false or change (as things do in a week-to-week industry -- imagine trying to predict who Jimmy Fallon's guests will be in three months time), but the idea of Fastlane being a big show isn't "nothing."

Mr. Nerfect 01-18-2016 01:57 AM

Of course, they're all WrestleMania to you, so you don't really extract that nugget.

The CyNick 01-27-2016 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The CyNick (Post 4756487)
"For what it's worth, and plans are always changing, but F4Wonline.com reports that the finish for the 30-man Royal Rumble main event is written and whatever they have planned to happen is going to set up a big match at the February 21st Fastlane pay-per-view. WWE officials reportedly want Fastlane to be an A-level pay-per-view and not just another stop on the Road to WrestleMania."

The breaking news here from one of the so-called industry leaders:

1. An upcoming Network Special has a finish booked (what is the actual finish? Well that would require inside information).

2. A future Network Special will have a "big match". (More shocking news at 11)

How is this acceptable?

So back to my original point.

What happened at the Rumble that set up the Fastlane main event?

Answer: terrible journalism

drave 01-27-2016 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The CyNick (Post 4763210)
So back to my original point.

What happened at the Rumble that set up the Fastlane main event?

Answer: terrible journalism


HHH won the belt. As a direct reaction to that victory, the main event of Fastlane will now be a lackluster Triple Threat that Gorgeous Dale Newstead already "wrote out".

Card subject to change.


Titties.

drave 01-27-2016 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drave (Post 4763220)
HHH won the belt. As a direct reaction to that victory, the main event of Fastlane will now be a lackluster Triple Threat that Gorgeous Dale Newstead already "wrote out".

Card subject to change.


Titties.


You might say

"But Drave, the match wasn't made until RAW. Also, I don't like titties because...."

To which I would say

"True, but there wouldn't have been the NEED to create the main event of the PPV if said result did not happen the night before."



ALTERNATE DIMENSIONAL EXISTENCE IS RUINING THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT!!!!!!


I like bacon.

The CyNick 01-27-2016 05:36 PM

Rumble itself was for the title. We knew that going in. The "big scoop" from the bloggers was Rumble finish has been finalized and it will lead to something at Fastlane.

No such thing happened.

Another example of pure bullshit that comes out of these guys mouths.

Simple Fan 01-27-2016 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The CyNick (Post 4763210)
So back to my original point.

What happened at the Rumble that set up the Fastlane main event?

Answer: terrible booking

Now the answer is correct.

Emperor Smeat 01-27-2016 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The CyNick (Post 4763247)
Rumble itself was for the title. We knew that going in. The "big scoop" from the bloggers was Rumble finish has been finalized and it will lead to something at Fastlane.

No such thing happened.

Another example of pure bullshit that comes out of these guys mouths.

Authority won the title which is something they wanted done ever since Reigns became a thorn to them. Storyline after the Rumble became what to do with the #1 contender spot which is what Fastlane is set to answer.

Fastlane now gets the Rumble's traditional #1 contender's match instead of the usual meaningless throw-away match because of its traditional bad position between Rumble and Mania.

Big Vic 02-10-2016 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PWI
I mentioned over the weekend that the planned Braun Strowman vs. The Undertaker singles match at WrestleMania 32 may have been nixed already. While several ideas for The Wyatt Family have been tossed around lately, Taker vs. Braun was penciled in as Vince McMahon was a big fan of doing the match and has taken an interest in building Strowman.

The online backlash in the first 24 hours after the Braun vs. Taker news broke may have changed WWE's plans, according to PWInsider. A very well-placed source noted that the bad reaction to the match may have caught on within the company and the match may have been nixed within 24 hours of the news getting out. It should be noted that Vince is always changing plans and they could go back to Taker vs. Braun.

In regards to what the back-up plan for Taker would be, a source noted that those details had not trickled down to other sources yet and likely only a small circle of people were aware of exactly what those plans are. It was noted that Taker's opponent at WrestleMania will likely be someone totally unexpected.


Droford 02-10-2016 12:43 PM

Taker vs AJ Styles
The Phenom vs the Phenomenal One

Writes itself

WorkrateHeel 02-10-2016 12:52 PM

i read STD's blog. it's fucking awesome at how he can't spell, or form thoughts

drave 02-10-2016 02:37 PM

Perhaps proofread your own writing before trying to tear someone else down for the same thing.

The CyNick 02-10-2016 07:59 PM

Re Strowman story from PWI

Or "our well placed source was full of shit but we're too stupid to know it"


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®