![]() |
WWE or NWA:TNA
I'd pick NWA: TNA anyday over the current WWE product. What about you?
|
WWE
|
Mr JL Blows Goats...........I have proof.
|
Mr JL blew my goat! My lawyer says that if the goat doesn't stop with the nervous ticks soon it could be labeled as post traumatic stress syndrome and then I can sue the shit out of Mr JL and get my goat the help he really needs.....which is psychological care from the guy who played the dad on "Growing Pains" (he's the only psychiatrist that I know...even if he is a fictional character.)
|
Quote:
Recruit him!! Recruit HIM! :y: :yes: :yes: |
ROH
|
Hey you forgot to put the B in between JL. Mr.JBL
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
:shifty: |
So now I blow goats? ... thats just great
|
AND THEY HAVE PROOF!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
and someone on the net has proof |
Anyway, back to that silly topic thing...
WWE by far. I'm not quite sure what it is, maybe just the production value, but NWA:TNA is kinda hard to watch. Sure they have some fairly amazing talent, but so does the WWE. We're just so used to how amazing they are that we forget that they are in fact amazing sometimes. Plus, the name Total Nonstop Action sucks a fatty. I dunno, I'm just sayin'. |
lol TNA
WWE by a mile |
WWF
|
E C Dubya
|
I WOULD GO WITH WWE, TNA IS WORSE THAN SOME OF THE WEAKEST WCW WRESTLERS BACK IN THEIR DAY.
I THINK BROCK LESNAR AND FEROCIOUS ALONE COULD TAKE ON TNA, AND TAKE THEM OUT WWWWWWWWWWWWWOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHH YYYYESSSSSS |
Dirtyunderweartaker...
I'm just going to say one thing. :nono: I.J.S.&.I.A.O.T.M |
I love the WWE.
:shifty: |
WWE...
...but...TNA is a fresh change of pace. I hope it does catch on so the WWE product doesn't seem so... "safe". |
Even though there are some real good things on TNA I am going to go with the WWE.
|
I think for every 3 topics made in the wrestling forums, theres 1 that is a jobber thread. One of the other ones is a better reason for a wrestling mod.
The fact that you said NWA:TNA is better than WWE is completely assinine. The owner is retarded. 15% of their roster has real talent. AJ Styles is the only new talent in that company worth looking at. Are you like, one of those guys who says things to be different? I bet you watch smackdown for JBL. Nazi. JK lol |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
*Cough*Half the roster*cough*
I still prefer WWE though because of the production values and the overall product but I like to see "alternative" wrestling. |
Quote:
|
TNA.. its fresh and so clean.
WWE is so boring and repetitive anymore. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I prefer to watch WWE, simply for familiarity's sake, but Impact is exciting (when Dusty Rhodes and Jeff Jarrett aren't on my TV). The X Division wrestlers are what the WWE Cruiserweights should be. I hope Vince actually watches Impact and decides "Hey! I bet Paul London could do that..." |
WWE or TNA?
ECW |
Quote:
|
TNA is too damn gimmicky. The X divsion matches on Impact annoy me because about 90% of the time, someone is hitting a hurricanrana. It's rediculous. And then they don't sell it worth a sh</>it.
|
I'm this close to putting the entire jWo stable on ignore. Fucking annoying spammers.
Anyways, I'd LOVE TNA to be a legit threat to WWE. Time will tell. Then I'd make my decision. But for now, WWE. |
WWWF
|
TNA. I've been waiting for a wrestling alternative since WCW was sold. I tape RAW and watch it later, hoping something interesting will happen---no such luck though. On the other hand, I've taped Impact!, and watched it more than once.
|
Chris Sabin, Frankie Kazarian, Abyss, Monty Brown, Chris Harris - five names off the top of my head that have never been in WCW or WWF and all are fine talents.
|
Quote:
|
I may be having slight memory problems, but I think those guys were in WCW or WWF.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®